Crypto analyst Alex Krüger has spoken about the reasons behind the recent drop in Bitcoin's price. Here are the details. Continue Reading: What Caused Bitcoin Crypto analyst Alex Krüger has spoken about the reasons behind the recent drop in Bitcoin's price. Here are the details. Continue Reading: What Caused Bitcoin

What Caused Bitcoin to Fall So Much? Expert Economist Lists 15 Reasons

2026/02/07 02:56
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Following the sharp decline in cryptocurrency markets, economist Alex Krüger published a comprehensive assessment of the reasons behind the recent pullback.

Krüger argued that the market’s loss of momentum was not due to a single factor, but rather a combination of both structural and macroeconomic elements.

According to Krüger, the process began with a sharp sell-off, which he described as the “October 10 massacre.” This was followed by a period of heavy euphoria, replacing the excessive optimism generated by the “Digital Asset Treasures (DAT)” model—strategies for holding crypto assets on company balance sheets—which weakened the market. Furthermore, the reversal of some large-scale fund flows following the US Department of Justice’s (DoJ) indictment against the Cambodia-based Prince Group also put pressure on liquidity.

Krüger argued that the recent surge in quantum computing discussions should not be ignored, asserting that this risk is “real.” He also stated that the enormous opportunities in artificial intelligence are diverting capital, talent, and even mining capacity away from cryptocurrency, creating a significant opportunity cost.

Krüger stated that Bitcoin’s increasing perception as an “American asset” is also affecting demand dynamics, noting that Chinese investors, who played a significant role in the rise of commodity markets, are showing less interest in cryptocurrency than before. Additionally, he argued that the increasing dominance of institutional investors and traditional finance in the market has led to crypto moving away from its “cypherpunk” and rebellious tech identity and transforming into an ETF-centric instrument. He concluded that cryptocurrencies are no longer “a space for the marginalized and geniuses,” but rather an item in 401k portfolios.

Related News: Bitcoin Wicked to $55,000 on an Exchange - They Made a Statement

Krüger also stated that the political risks associated with Donald Trump and the uncertainties that a potential Democratic administration change could create are also putting pressure on pricing. In addition, he said that there has been a lack of innovation, especially in the post-Hyperliquid era, and that the collapse of the memecoin craze in the Solana ecosystem has damaged investor confidence.

The oversupply in the market was also one of the main problems highlighted by Krüger. Citing CoinMarketCap data showing that the number of tracked cryptocurrencies has reached 29.91 million, the economist stated that a large portion of the tokens in the top 200 are overvalued and their technical charts have long appeared distorted. He also argued that the constant launch of new tokens often results in sharp crashes after short-lived rallies, with only insider investors profiting most of the time.

According to Krüger, the weakening of the “digital gold” narrative and sharp declines in some stock categories, such as software stocks, have also reduced appetite in the crypto market. He noted that in this environment, more aggressive selling is seen with every rise, while the appetite for buying at the bottom has significantly weakened.

On the macro front, Krüger noted that Kevin Warsh’s candidacy created a new turning point in the market, stating that because Warsh is a proponent of small balance sheets, expectations of quantitative easing (QE) and yield curve control (YCC) have been shelved, and instead, concerns about quantitative tightening (QT) have come to the forefront.

*This is not investment advice.

Continue Reading: What Caused Bitcoin to Fall So Much? Expert Economist Lists 15 Reasons

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

The post What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Legal experts have raised concerns that ABC’s decision to pull “Jimmy Kimmel Live” from its airwaves following the host’s controversial comments about the death of Charlie Kirk, could be because the Trump administration violated free speech protections through a practice known as “jawboning.” Jimmy Kimmel speaks at Disney’s Advertising Upfront on May 13 in New York City. Disney via Getty Images Key Facts Disney-owned ABC announced Wednesday Kimmel’s show will be taken off the air “indefinitely,” which came after ABC affiliate owner Nexstar—which needs Federal Communications Commission approval to complete a planned acquisition of competitor Tegna Inc.—said it would not air the program due to Kimmel’s comments Monday regarding Kirk’s death and the reaction to it. The sudden move drew particular concern because it came only hours after FCC head Brendan Carr called for ABC to “take action” against Kimmel, and cryptically suggested his agency could take action saying, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.” While ABC and Nexstar have not given any indication their decisions were influenced by Carr’s comments, the timing raised concerns among legal experts that the Trump administration’s threats may have unlawfully coerced ABC and Nexstar to punish Kimmel, which could constitute jawboning. Jawboning refers to “the use of official speech to inappropriately compel private action,” as defined by the Cato Institute, as governments or public officials—who cannot directly punish private actors for speech they don’t like—can use strongman tactics to try and indirectly silence critics or influence private companies’ actions. The practice is fairly loosely defined and there aren’t many legal safeguards dictating how violations of it are enforced, the Knight First Amendment Institute notes, but the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled it can be unlawful and an impermissible First Amendment violation when it involves specific threats. The White…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 07:17
Why Fintech Platforms Are Growing Faster Than Traditional Banks

Why Fintech Platforms Are Growing Faster Than Traditional Banks

Fintech platforms are outpacing traditional banks in growth across nearly every measurable dimension. Customer acquisition rates, revenue growth, geographic expansion
Share
Techbullion2026/03/24 07:58
Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly

Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly

BitcoinWorld Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly TOKYO, Japan — March 2025: Japan’s National Consumer
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/24 08:10