The post Morgan Stanley backs Cipher (CIFR) and TeraWulf (WULF), but is cool on Marathon (MARA) appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Morgan Stanley initiated coverageThe post Morgan Stanley backs Cipher (CIFR) and TeraWulf (WULF), but is cool on Marathon (MARA) appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Morgan Stanley initiated coverage

Morgan Stanley backs Cipher (CIFR) and TeraWulf (WULF), but is cool on Marathon (MARA)

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Morgan Stanley initiated coverage of three publicly traded bitcoin BTC$70,544.94 mining companies on Monday, backing two names tied to data center leasing while taking a more cautious stance on a miner focused on bitcoin exposure.

Analyst Stephen Byrd and his team started coverage of Cipher Mining (CIFR) and TeraWulf (WULF) with Overweight ratings and set price targets of $38 and $37, respectively. Shares of CIFR are higher by 12.4% Monday to $16.51, while WULF is ahead 12.8% to $16.12.

He also initiated coverage of Marathon Digital (MARA) with an Underweight rating and an $8 target. Shares of MARA are marginally higher on Monday at $8.28.

Byrd’s core argument rests on viewing certain bitcoin mining sites less as crypto bets and more as infrastructure assets. Once a mining company has built a data center and signed a long-term lease with a strong counterparty, he wrote, the asset is better suited to investors who value steady cash flow than to traders focused on bitcoin price swings.

“At a macro level, once a bitcoin company has a built-in data center and entered into a long-term lease with a creditworthy counterparty, that DC’s natural investor habitat is not among bitcoin investors but among infrastructure investors,” Byrd wrote, adding that such assets should be valued for “long-term, stable cash flow.”

To make the point concrete, Byrd compared these facilities to data center real estate investment trusts such as Equinix (EQIX) and Digital Realty (DLR), which he described as “the closest comparable companies to consider when valuing DC assets developed by bitcoin companies.” Their shares trade at more than 20 times forward EBITDA, meaning investors are willing to pay over $20 for every $1 of expected annual operating cash flow because those firms offer scale, diversification and steady growth.

Byrd does not expect data centers developed by bitcoin companies to trade at similar levels, “primarily because these data center REITs have growth potential that a single DC asset does not provide.” Still, he sees room for higher valuations than the market currently assigns.

Cipher sits at the center of that view. Byrd described the company’s data centers as suitable for what he called a “REIT endgame.” “We use the phrase ‘REIT endgame’ to describe our valuation approach because, ultimately, these contracted DCs should be owned by REIT-like investors that appropriately value long-term, low-risk contracted cash flows,” he wrote.

In a simple scenario, a Cipher site that shifts from self-mining bitcoin to leasing space to a large cloud or computing customer could resemble a toll road. Cash flows become predictable. The role of bitcoin fades.

TeraWulf earned a similar framework. Byrd pointed to the company’s history of signing data center agreements and to management’s background in power infrastructure. “TeraWulf has a strong track record of signing agreements with data center customers, and the management team has extensive experience in building a wide range of power infrastructure assets,” he wrote.

He expects the firm to convert sites without bitcoin-to-data-center contracts at a present value of about $8 per watt. His base case assumes the company succeeds in roughly half of its planned annual data center growth of 250 megawatts per year over 2028-2032. In a more optimistic scenario, he assumes that the success rate rises to 75%.

The tone shifted with Marathon Digital. Byrd argued that the company offers “lower potential upside driven by bitcoin-to-DC conversions.” He cited Marathon’s hybrid strategy, which combines mining with data center ambitions rather than fully repurposing sites, along with its focus on maximizing exposure to bitcoin’s price, including issuing convertible notes and using the proceeds to buy bitcoin.

Marathon’s limited history of hosting data centers also weighed on the view. “For MARA, bitcoin mining economics are the dominant driver of the stock’s value,” Byrd wrote.

That focus carries risk. “Fundamentally, we see significant risks to profitability of bitcoin mining, both in the near and long terms,” Byrd added, noting that “the historical ROIC of the bitcoin mining business has been unattractive.”

The coverage lands as investors debate whether bitcoin miners should evolve into power and computing landlords. Morgan Stanley’s answer is selective. Where long-term leases and infrastructure discipline take hold, Byrd sees value. Where mining remains the core business, he sees fewer reasons to expect outsized gains.

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2026/02/09/cipher-mining-and-terawulf-are-buys-mara-a-sell-as-morgan-stanley-begins-bitcoin-miner-coverag

Market Opportunity
FLOW Logo
FLOW Price(FLOW)
$0.03037
$0.03037$0.03037
+0.66%
USD
FLOW (FLOW) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Glenn Hughes Scores His Greatest Chart Debut On His Own

Glenn Hughes Scores His Greatest Chart Debut On His Own

The post Glenn Hughes Scores His Greatest Chart Debut On His Own appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Nearly 10 years after Resonate, Glenn Hughes scores a new career high as Chosen opens at No. 4 on the Official Rock and Metal Albums chart. NEW YORK, NEW YORK – APRIL 08: Glenn Hughes of Deep Purple speaks onstage during the 31st Annual Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame Induction Ceremony at Barclays Center on April 8, 2016 in New York City. (Photo by Mike Coppola/Getty Images) Getty Images Almost a decade after his last solo album Resonate arrived, Glenn Hughes returns with Chosen. The rock superstar’s fifteenth project under his own name debuts on multiple charts in the United Kingdom, where he remains a legend in his chosen field. Chosen opens inside loftiest tiers on multiple tallies and even gives Hughes his first solo win on one roster. Glenn Hughes Scores First Hit on One Chart Chosen debuts on the Official Albums Downloads chart at No. 60. Hughes scores his first solo win on the list of the bestselling full-lengths and EPs on download platforms like iTunes and Amazon in the U.K., as his latest project arrives. Glenn Hughes Reaches a New Peak Chosen earns its loftiest starting point on the Official Rock and Metal Albums chart, where it kicks off at No. 4. Hughes reaches a new all-time high as the set arrives and collects his second top 10. Resonate peaked at No. 6, earning Hughes his first top 10 bestseller almost 10 years back, while Music for the Divine only spent one frame at No. 33 nearly 20 years ago. Glenn Hughes on the Albums Charts Chosen also brings Hughes to new all-time peak positions on both the Official Albums Sales and Official Physical Albums charts. The set debuts at Nos. 25 and 26 on those tallies, respectively. Only Resonate had previously landed on those lists,…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:41
Aptos Technology Concepts Compared to XRP Tundra’s Approach

Aptos Technology Concepts Compared to XRP Tundra’s Approach

The post Aptos Technology Concepts Compared to XRP Tundra’s Approach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The conversation around blockchain innovation often centers on scalability, speed, and utility. Aptos is a Layer-1 blockchain built on Move language principles. It has positioned itself as a network prioritizing parallel execution and developer flexibility. While its technical ambitions have generated attention, the project still competes in a crowded field of platforms racing to establish themselves as the backbone of decentralized finance. XRP Tundra, in contrast, has anchored its design around an immediate problem facing millions of XRP holders: idle assets that generate no yield. Tundra is not competing directly in the smart contract arms race. It introduces a practical application through its dual-token model and staking vaults. The approach brings staking, yield farming, and governance functions directly into the XRP ecosystem. That also without requiring holders to leave the XRPL environment. How Does XRP Tundra Differ from Aptos’ Model? Aptos has emphasized modular scalability and throughput, seeking to attract developers who need high-performance infrastructure. Its model, while technically impressive, depends on widespread adoption of its unique Move programming language and the creation of a vibrant dApp ecosystem. The success of this vision is closely tied to developer participation and long-term ecosystem growth. XRP Tundra addresses an entirely different user base and challenge. For years, XRP has remained locked in wallets with no direct staking or yield options. Tundra introduces Cryo Vaults, where XRP can be “frozen” for 7 to 90 days. Thus, it rewards holders with yields that can reach up to 30% APY.  Enhancements through Frost Keys, special NFTs that boost returns, add further incentives for long-term engagement. Importantly, XRP never leaves the XRPL, ensuring holders maintain the security of the native ledger while activating passive income streams. Where Aptos focuses on abstract performance metrics, XRP Tundra focuses on a tangible need of its core community. It turns…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/22 21:42
The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

This article explores how a simple change in the reference point can achieve a Pareto-efficient equilibrium in both free and fair economies and those with social justice.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 22:30