TLDR Foundry and AntPool mining pools now control over 51% of Bitcoin’s total hashrate, creating potential attack risks This represents the highest mining concentration in over a decade, raising decentralization concerns A 51% attack could enable transaction manipulation and double-spending but would cost around $1.1 trillion to execute Bitcoin price declined toward $110,530 support level [...] The post Bitcoin’s Decentralization Under Threat as Mining Pools Control Over 51% of Network Hashrate appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Foundry and AntPool mining pools now control over 51% of Bitcoin’s total hashrate, creating potential attack risks This represents the highest mining concentration in over a decade, raising decentralization concerns A 51% attack could enable transaction manipulation and double-spending but would cost around $1.1 trillion to execute Bitcoin price declined toward $110,530 support level [...] The post Bitcoin’s Decentralization Under Threat as Mining Pools Control Over 51% of Network Hashrate appeared first on CoinCentral.

Bitcoin’s Decentralization Under Threat as Mining Pools Control Over 51% of Network Hashrate

TLDR

  • Foundry and AntPool mining pools now control over 51% of Bitcoin’s total hashrate, creating potential attack risks
  • This represents the highest mining concentration in over a decade, raising decentralization concerns
  • A 51% attack could enable transaction manipulation and double-spending but would cost around $1.1 trillion to execute
  • Bitcoin price declined toward $110,530 support level while facing broader macroeconomic pressures
  • Empty blocks are increasing, suggesting miners prioritize speed over transaction fees and network efficiency

Two major Bitcoin mining pools now control more than 51% of the network’s total computing power. This concentration has sparked concerns about potential attacks and the future of Bitcoin’s decentralized structure.

Foundry currently holds 33.63% of Bitcoin’s mining hashrate. AntPool controls another 17.94% of the network’s power. Together, these two pools command over half of all Bitcoin mining activity.

This marks the first time mining concentration has reached such levels in more than a decade. The development has raised questions about Bitcoin’s core principle of decentralization.

Mining Concentration Reaches Critical Threshold

Analyst Jacob King highlighted the concentration issue on social media platforms. He noted that the two pools could theoretically combine their power to manipulate the network.

Statistics from other analysts show that the top three mining pools frequently control over 80% of Bitcoin’s global hashrate. This level of concentration has become a growing concern within the cryptocurrency community.

A 51% attack would allow controlling parties to manipulate transaction validation. They could potentially reverse confirmed transactions or enable double-spending scenarios.

Such an attack could compromise the integrity of the Bitcoin network. It would likely cause financial losses and damage confidence in Bitcoin as a secure asset.

Foundry USA recently mined eight consecutive blocks in a row. This unusual event has been seen as evidence of growing centralization risks within the network.

The rise in empty blocks has also become a concern. These blocks contain no transactions and generate minimal fees for miners.

Economic Barriers and Market Impact

Experts estimate that executing a 51% attack on Bitcoin would cost approximately $1.1 trillion. This massive expense creates a strong economic barrier against such attacks.

The high cost involves purchasing substantial infrastructure and energy resources. These requirements make a 51% attack logistically challenging despite the mining concentration.

Economic incentives may also discourage such attacks from mining pools themselves. A successful attack could cause Bitcoin’s price to collapse, harming the attackers’ own investments.

However, the mere perception of vulnerability has already affected market confidence. Investors are showing concern about the systemic risks posed by centralized mining power.

Bitcoin’s price has declined toward the $110,530 support level. Technical indicators show bearish momentum in the short term.

If the price holds above $110,530, analysts believe a rebound toward $120,000 remains possible. A breakdown below this level could signal further declines toward $107,000 or $100,000.

Macroeconomic factors are also influencing market sentiment. Federal Reserve policy shifts and concerns over new stablecoin legislation have added pressure to crypto markets.

The newly passed Genius Act stablecoin bill has raised fears about potential withdrawals from the stablecoin sector. These concerns create additional challenges for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

Bitcoin’s hashrate and mining difficulty currently sit at record highs. Despite these technical strengths, centralization concerns continue to weigh on market psychology and investor confidence.

The post Bitcoin’s Decentralization Under Threat as Mining Pools Control Over 51% of Network Hashrate appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Nowchain Logo
Nowchain Price(NOW)
$0.00092
$0.00092$0.00092
0.00%
USD
Nowchain (NOW) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Trading time: Tonight, the US GDP and the upcoming non-farm data will become the market focus. Institutions are bullish on BTC to $120,000 in the second quarter.

Daily market key data review and trend analysis, produced by PANews.
Share
PANews2025/04/30 13:50
CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon

The post CEO Sandeep Nailwal Shared Highlights About RWA on Polygon appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted Polygon’s lead in global bonds, Spiko US T-Bill, and Spiko Euro T-Bill. Polygon published an X post to share that its roadmap to GigaGas was still scaling. Sentiments around POL price were last seen to be bearish. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal shared key pointers from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. These pertain to highlights about RWA on Polygon. Simultaneously, Polygon underlined its roadmap towards GigaGas. Sentiments around POL price were last seen fumbling under bearish emotions. Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal on Polygon RWA CEO Sandeep Nailwal highlighted three key points from the Dune and RWA.xyz report. The Chief Executive of Polygon maintained that Polygon PoS was hosting RWA TVL worth $1.13 billion across 269 assets plus 2,900 holders. Nailwal confirmed from the report that RWA was happening on Polygon. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 The X post published by Polygon CEO Sandeep Nailwal underlined that the ecosystem was leading in global bonds by holding a 62% share of tokenized global bonds. He further highlighted that Polygon was leading with Spiko US T-Bill at approximately 29% share of TVL along with Ethereum, adding that the ecosystem had more than 50% share in the number of holders. Finally, Sandeep highlighted from the report that there was a strong adoption for Spiko Euro T-Bill with 38% share of TVL. He added that 68% of returns were on Polygon across all the chains. Polygon Roadmap to GigaGas In a different update from Polygon, the community…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:10