Phantom unveils Chat for 2026, but address poisoning scams drain wallets. User lost 3.5 WBTC last week. ZachXBT warns wallet’s not fixing the issue. Phantom’s gonnaPhantom unveils Chat for 2026, but address poisoning scams drain wallets. User lost 3.5 WBTC last week. ZachXBT warns wallet’s not fixing the issue. Phantom’s gonna

Phantom Chat 2026 Incoming… But Address Poisoning Is Already Killing Wallets

2026/02/11 01:45
3 min read

Phantom unveils Chat for 2026, but address poisoning scams drain wallets. User lost 3.5 WBTC last week. ZachXBT warns wallet’s not fixing the issue.

Phantom’s gonna launch Chat in 2026. Sounds exciting, right? But there’s a problem that’s way worse.

The wallet just teased its new feature. According to Phantom on X, they’re rolling out Chat this year. They said, “2024: Telegram, 2025: X communities, 2026: PHANTOM CHAT.”

Source: Phantom

People seemed hyped about it. New social features always get attention. But one security researcher wasn’t impressed at all.

Your Wallet’s Biggest Threat Right Now

ZachXBT didn’t hold back his criticism. The on-chain investigator called out Phantom pretty hard.

According to ZachXBT on X, there’s “a new method for people to get drained.” He told Phantom to “please consider fixing address poisoning first.”

Source: Zachxbt 

A user lost 3.5 WBTC last week. That’s a massive hit for anyone holding crypto. The theft happened through address poisoning, ZachXBT said.

The victim copied what looked like their address. But it wasn’t theirs at all. The UI didn’t filter spam transactions properly.

How This Scam Actually Works

Address poisoning’s kinda sneaky, honestly. Scammers send tiny amounts to your wallet. These transactions create fake addresses in your history.

The fake addresses look real at first glance. The first few characters match your real address. Last characters match too sometimes.

Users check their transaction history later. They see what looks like their address. Copy it without checking the middle part.

Money goes to the scammer’s wallet instead. It’s gone before you realize the mistake. No way to get it back either.

ZachXBT shared the theft details publicly. The stolen funds went to address 0x85cBe4af7167887839f27A759EED03E7Af11D8f6. Transaction hash was 0x9f0fc3cd380fcde7cd7f0b1d8a646021841b211b784ac00c8ed9d4e267a647a4.

Phantom’s UI still shows these spam transactions. That’s the core problem ZachXBT’s pointing out. Users can’t tell real from fake easily.

Stop Getting Poisoned – Do This Now

Don’t copy addresses from transaction history ever. Use your address book or saved contacts. Double-check every single character before sending.

Verify the entire address, not just the start. Middle characters matter just as much. One wrong letter sends funds to scammers.

Send small test amounts first, always. Wait for confirmation before big transfers. Costs more in fees but saves fortunes.

Use hardware wallets when you can. They show full addresses on the device. Makes verification way easier and safer.

Some wallets filter spam transactions automatically. Phantom doesn’t do this yet, apparently. That’s what ZachXBT’s calling them out for.

The researcher thinks Chat’s premature right now. Security issues need fixing before new features. Makes sense when people’re losing Bitcoin weekly.

Phantom hasn’t responded to ZachXBT’s criticism yet. They’re probably gonna address it soon though. Community pressure builds fast in the crypto space.

Address poisoning attacks keep growing this year. More wallets need better spam filtering. Users gotta stay alert till that happens.

The post Phantom Chat 2026 Incoming… But Address Poisoning Is Already Killing Wallets appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Market Opportunity
Solchat Logo
Solchat Price(CHAT)
$0.0542
$0.0542$0.0542
+0.37%
USD
Solchat (CHAT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Why is XRP Price Dropping Today?

Why is XRP Price Dropping Today?

The post Why is XRP Price Dropping Today? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP price continued falling today, as broader crypto selling pressure stayed strong
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/11 06:40
Robinhood reports record quarterly revenue despite crypto slump

Robinhood reports record quarterly revenue despite crypto slump

Illustration: Gwen P; Source: Shutterstock
Share
DL News2026/02/11 06:45