Digital currencies were supposed to make sending money across borders cheaper and faster. The cost of converting these digital dollars into actual currency, howeverDigital currencies were supposed to make sending money across borders cheaper and faster. The cost of converting these digital dollars into actual currency, however

Africans are paying more to convert stablecoins into actual currency

2026/02/12 02:45
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Digital currencies were supposed to make sending money across borders cheaper and faster. The cost of converting these digital dollars into actual currency, however, is still higher than expected for African users.

According to recent research, while the median conversion cost across Africa is about 3%, some countries face significantly worse rates, with Botswana experiencing costs as high as 19.4%.

The data presents a concerning picture. The median cost for Botswana residents to convert their digital currency into local currency in January 2026 was 19.4%. Research that examined almost 94,000 pricing checks across 66 currency corridors in Africa revealed this to be the highest rate.

Source: borderless.xyz

Competition drives the price gap

Research from payments company Borderless.xyz found that while the technology itself works fine, moving money around the world for almost nothing, the real problem happens at the end of the line. That final step, when digital money becomes cash you can actually spend, is where costs pile up.

Across Africa, the typical cost for this conversion sits at about 3%, or 299 basis points. Compare that to Latin America, where users pay around 1.3%, or Asia, where the cost drops to just 0.07%. African customers are clearly getting a worse deal.

Congo wasn’t far behind Botswana, with conversion costs running over 13%. These high prices show up in places where only one or two companies handle these transactions. Without competition, there’s nothing stopping them from charging whatever they want.

South Africa tells a different story. There, multiple companies compete for business, and conversion costs stayed around 1.5% in early 2026. The pattern is clear: more competition means lower prices. The technology isn’t the issue; it’s about how many companies are fighting for customers.

This creates a strange situation. Mobile technologies and services in Africa generated $220 billion in economic value in 2024. But that growth isn’t helping everyone equally. People in certain countries are stuck paying premium prices while their neighbors get better deals.

Researchers created a measurement called the “TradFi Premium” to compare digital currency rates with traditional bank exchange rates. Around the world, the difference between the two is tiny, just 0.05%. In Africa, that gap jumps to 1.2%, or 119 basis points. African users are paying extra just to access the same digital money that costs almost nothing elsewhere.

At the World Economic Forum in Davos on January 24, economist Vera Songwe talked about how digital currencies are cutting costs in a region where traditional money transfer services often charge 6% or more, about $6 for every $100 sent. She’s right about some places. However, the new data shows this only works where companies actually compete.

The findings reveal that in some African countries, using digital currencies actually costs more than the old-fashioned wire transfer services everyone thought they would replace. That is the opposite of what was supposed to happen.

More providers needed to lower costs

More technology is not the answer. The only thing these pricey avenues need is more businesses eager to conduct business there. Customers are forced to pay the established price when a market is controlled by a single provider.

Government rules matter too. Countries without clear regulations for digital currencies end up stuck in place. New companies will not enter markets where the legal situation remains unclear, and without new companies, prices stay high.

The blockchain technology works exactly as promised, it moves money across borders quickly and cheaply. But until more providers enter markets like Botswana and Congo, and until governments create clear rules that encourage competition, many African users will keep paying far more than they should. The revolution in money transfers is here, but it’s not reaching everyone yet.

Sharpen your strategy with mentorship + daily ideas - 30 days free access to our trading program

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated

Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated

The post Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X account @SaniExp, which belongs to the founder of the Timechain Index explorer, has published data showing that a dormant BTC wallet was activated after hibernating for six years. However, it was set up 13 years ago, according to the tweet — the time when Satoshi Nakamoto’s shadow was still casting itself around, so to speak. The X post states that the tweet belongs to infamous early Bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox, which suffered from a major hack in the early 2010s, and last year it began paying out compensation to clients who lost their crypto in that hack. The deadline was eventually extended to October 2025. Mt. Gox’s wallet with 1,000 BTC reactivated The above-mentioned data source shared a screenshot from the Timechain Index explorer, showing multiple transactions marked as confirmed and moving a total of 1,000 Bitcoins. This amount of crypto is valued at $116,195,100 at the time of the initiated transaction. Last year, Mt. Gox began to move the remains of its gargantuan funds to pay out compensations to its creditors. Earlier this year, it also made several massive transactions to partner exchanges to distribute funds to Mt. Gox investors. All of the compensations were promised to be paid out by Oct. 31, 2025. The aforementioned transaction is likely preparation for another payout. The exchange was hacked for several years due to multiple unnoticed security breaches, and in 2014, when the site went offline, 744,408 Bitcoins were reported stolen. Source: https://u.today/satoshi-era-mtgoxs-1000-bitcoin-wallet-suddenly-reactivated
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 10:18
The U.S. Department of Defense has appointed a former DOGE official as Chief Data Officer to lead efforts in the field of AI.

The U.S. Department of Defense has appointed a former DOGE official as Chief Data Officer to lead efforts in the field of AI.

PANews reported on March 7 that, according to Reuters, the U.S. Department of Defense has appointed computer scientist Gavin Kliger as chief data officer. Kliger
Share
PANews2026/03/07 21:00
Fed Makes First Rate Cut of the Year, Lowers Rates by 25 Bps

Fed Makes First Rate Cut of the Year, Lowers Rates by 25 Bps

The post Fed Makes First Rate Cut of the Year, Lowers Rates by 25 Bps appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Federal Reserve has made its first Fed rate cut this year following today’s FOMC meeting, lowering interest rates by 25 basis points (bps). This comes in line with expectations, while the crypto market awaits Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s speech for guidance on the committee’s stance moving forward. FOMC Makes First Fed Rate Cut This Year With 25 Bps Cut In a press release, the committee announced that it has decided to lower the target range for the federal funds rate by 25 bps from between 4.25% and 4.5% to 4% and 4.25%. This comes in line with expectations as market participants were pricing in a 25 bps cut, as against a 50 bps cut. This marks the first Fed rate cut this year, with the last cut before this coming last year in December. Notably, the Fed also made the first cut last year in September, although it was a 50 bps cut back then. All Fed officials voted in favor of a 25 bps cut except Stephen Miran, who dissented in favor of a 50 bps cut. This rate cut decision comes amid concerns that the labor market may be softening, with recent U.S. jobs data pointing to a weak labor market. The committee noted in the release that job gains have slowed, and that the unemployment rate has edged up but remains low. They added that inflation has moved up and remains somewhat elevated. Fed Chair Jerome Powell had also already signaled at the Jackson Hole Conference that they were likely to lower interest rates with the downside risk in the labor market rising. The committee reiterated this in the release that downside risks to employment have risen. Before the Fed rate cut decision, experts weighed in on whether the FOMC should make a 25 bps cut or…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:36