Robinhood missed Q4 revenue estimates but beat on earnings per share
Robinhood reported weaker-than-expected revenue in the fourth quarter, and Wall Street didn’t care. Instead of backing off, most analysts turned around and kept pushing Buy ratings.
The company brought in $1.28 billion, missing the $1.35 billion analysts were looking for. But it still posted earnings of 66 cents per share, better than the expected 63 cents.
The stock still dropped 9% early Wednesday. It was already down 24% year-to-date by Tuesday.
The big red flag was the drop in net new assets (NNAs). But Barclays’ Benjamin said things started looking better in February. He pointed out that NNAs were down in December but ticked up in January and early February.
He added, “February looks off to a stronger start, particularly with NNAs, though commentary on trading volumes was ambiguous.” Even with that unclear part, he sounded confident the worst was already over.
Analysts lower targets but keep buy ratings
Goldman Sachs’ James lowered his 12-month price target for Robinhood from $152 to $130, still expecting a 52% gain. He also cut 2026 and 2027 earnings forecasts by 7% and 3%, while adding new projections for 2028. He said they dropped their P/E target from 54x to 45.5x, since the market is valuing stocks lower in general. Still, he’s standing behind Robinhood.
Deutsche Bank’s Brian also dropped his price target, from $155 to $130, but didn’t change his view. He called the fourth quarter “mixed.” Their adjusted earnings came in at 57 cents, which was lower than his own estimate of 61 cents, and below the 63-cent consensus. Robinhood got a 9-cent bump from taxes coming in lower than expected. Their adjusted EBITDA was $761 million, falling short of Deutsche’s $815 million and the $833 million average.
Barclays, despite pointing out weak securities lending and take rates, stayed optimistic. They cut their target from $159 to $124, but still expect a 45% upside.
They admitted some growth numbers were slowing down, but said Robinhood’s long-term goals could still keep the stock in play.
Morgan Stanley’s team, on the other hand, didn’t join the crowd. They left their equal-weight rating untouched, with a price target of $147, a 72% jump from Robinhood’s Tuesday price.
They noted that product development is strong heading into 2026, naming tools like Social, Cortex, the UK ISA rollout, prediction markets, and the Rothera JV. But they warned that NNAs and crypto could cause problems in the short term.
Crypto recovery and prediction markets draw new optimism
Bernstein’s Gautam had one of the most aggressive targets at $160, which would mean an 87% surge. He pointed out Robinhood’s prediction markets business just hit $435 million in annual revenue and said it’s on track to become a $1 billion business.
Gautam called the crypto weakness “expected” and brushed off the crash. He wrote, “We would ride out the crypto volatility and see no point in turning negative on the stock closer to the bottom.”
JPMorgan didn’t see it that way. Their team dropped its target from $130 to $113 and stuck with a neutral rating. They saw too many weak spots. Net deposits came in at $15.9 billion, which was below both their estimate of $18.5 billion and the $19.4 billion consensus. They also flagged slowing growth in Gold subscribers, account growth, and overall deposits. They wrote, “We thought the results were weaker than anticipated.”
Still, Robinhood posted a full-year EPS of $2.12, slightly ahead of expectations. And despite the revenue miss, key user metrics hit new highs. Gold users, funded accounts, and Gold card holders all reached record levels. That’s why most analysts aren’t panicking.
In their eyes, Robinhood has enough going for it to push through the short-term mess. Most of them are still betting big on what happens next.
Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.
You May Also Like
Bitcoin World Disrupt 2025: Your Final Chance for Unprecedented Brand Exposure at a Premier Tech Summit
X Crypto Accounts Reinstatement Scheme Exposed
