TLDR: Injective INJ lost 90% as market cap fell from $4B to $300M due to weak fundamentals. Total value locked remained under $100M, failing to support previousTLDR: Injective INJ lost 90% as market cap fell from $4B to $300M due to weak fundamentals. Total value locked remained under $100M, failing to support previous

Injective (INJ) Crashes 90%: Market Cap Falls to $300M Amid Weak Fundamentals

2026/02/14 16:51
3 min read

TLDR:

  • Injective INJ lost 90% as market cap fell from $4B to $300M due to weak fundamentals.
  • Total value locked remained under $100M, failing to support previous market hype.
  • Price failed to reclaim $10 breakout level, signaling structural trend weakness.
  • Large protocol wallets reduced circulating liquidity, increasing volatility and pressure on INJ.

Injective (INJ) has experienced a steep decline, losing nearly 90% of its market value. The token’s market cap dropped from almost $4 billion in 2024 to around $300 million today.

Early hype around on-chain derivatives, fast execution, and new integrations fueled a vertical price surge. However, underlying fundamentals such as total value locked (TVL) and trading activity did not grow at the same pace, leading to structural weaknesses that became evident over time.

Rapid Valuation and Price Structure Shifts

During 2024, Injective’s market cap approached $4 billion while TVL remained under $100 million, according to a report by Our Crypto Talk.

The gap between valuation and actual capital suggested the market was pricing in significant future growth. Investor attention focused on derivatives and integration narratives rather than tangible ecosystem adoption.

The token’s price rallied sharply, creating a vertical move that often signals overextension. When market risk appetite slowed, the price faced pressure as participants questioned whether usage and capital were sufficient to support such a high valuation.

In late 2025, INJ attempted to reclaim its previous $10 breakout level. The attempt failed, showing that buyer conviction was weakening.

Technical indicators, including the RSI, did not regain strength, and the trend channel continued downward. The failed breakout signaled a structural shift, with previous support zones now acting as resistance.

Price behavior reflected not just a temporary dip but a broader market reassessment. When a token cannot hold key technical levels, it indicates that participants are hesitant to enter at higher prices, resulting in a sustained decline.

TVL Limitations and Supply Concentration

Injective’s TVL never matched its market hype. At a nearly $4 billion market capitalization, TVL remained under $100 million, highlighting limited capital adoption.

Competing chains offered deeper liquidity and lower fees, attracting more participants. Without a strong TVL foundation, price momentum was harder to maintain, making the market correction inevitable.

Supply concentration also added downward pressure. A wallet labeled “Peggy Bridge Proxy” holds roughly $248 million of INJ, representing a large portion of the total market cap.

Although the wallet is protocol-related, its presence reduces effective circulating liquidity, making the token more sensitive to market movements.

Thin tradable supply contributes to higher volatility and faster drawdowns. It also complicates recovery because fewer tokens are available for market participants to absorb buying or selling pressure.

At its current $300 million valuation, INJ’s recovery would require meaningful TVL growth, increased derivatives volume, and broader participation beyond structured wallets.

Reclaiming previous technical levels would further indicate a healthier market structure and renewed investor confidence.

This reset in expectations may provide a clearer foundation for future growth if underlying metrics improve.

The post Injective (INJ) Crashes 90%: Market Cap Falls to $300M Amid Weak Fundamentals appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
Injective Logo
Injective Price(INJ)
$3.265
$3.265$3.265
+0.24%
USD
Injective (INJ) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

X Üst Düzey Yetkilisi, Platformda Kripto Paralar İçin Müjdeyi Verdi! Ancak Bazı Altcoinler İçin Kötü Haber Olabilir

X Üst Düzey Yetkilisi, Platformda Kripto Paralar İçin Müjdeyi Verdi! Ancak Bazı Altcoinler İçin Kötü Haber Olabilir

X Ürün Lideri ve Solana ekosistem danışmanı Nikita Bier, sosyal medya platformu X’te kripto para kullanımının artmasını desteklediğini ancak spam ve tacizi teşvik
Share
Coinstats2026/02/14 23:11
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Musk's Grok gains on Gemini, ChatGPT, defying deepfake regulatory backlash

Musk's Grok gains on Gemini, ChatGPT, defying deepfake regulatory backlash

Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence business xAI is under pressure from regulators on many continents after its chatbot Grok created AI-generated, inappropriate
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/02/14 23:14