TLDR Roundhill filed for six ETFs tied to 2028 US election outcomes through event contracts. The lineup covers the presidency plus Senate and House control for TLDR Roundhill filed for six ETFs tied to 2028 US election outcomes through event contracts. The lineup covers the presidency plus Senate and House control for

Eric Balchunas Says Roundhill Election ETFs Could Be Potentially Groundbreaking Soon

2026/02/15 17:31
3 min read

TLDR

  • Roundhill filed for six ETFs tied to 2028 US election outcomes through event contracts.
  • The lineup covers the presidency plus Senate and House control for each major party.
  • The filing says five funds could lose almost all value when event outcomes settle.
  • Eric Balchunas wrote on X that the structure could be “potentially groundbreaking.”

Roundhill Investments has filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission to launch six exchange-traded funds tied to event contracts on the 2028 US election. ETF analyst Eric Balchunas said in an X post that, if approved, the products could be “potentially groundbreaking” because they place prediction-style exposure inside a familiar ETF wrapper.

Six Party Outcome ETFs Tied to President, Senate, and House

Roundhill submitted the filings on Friday and proposed funds linked to outcomes for the presidency and control of Congress. The lineup includes the Roundhill Democratic President ETF and the Roundhill Republican President ETF, along with Democratic and Republican ETFs tied to the Senate and the House.

The filing says each fund would invest in, or seek exposure to, a “unique type of derivative instrument known as an event contract.” These contracts are structured to pay out based on a defined and measurable outcome. In this case, the outcome is which party wins the presidency or which party controls each chamber after the election.

Why Observers Call the Structure Potentially Groundbreaking

Balchunas wrote on X on Saturday that approval could open “a huge door to all kinds of stuff.” He added that prediction market applications can be easy to sign up for, but ETFs are “just that much easier.” His comments pointed to the way ETFs can be bought and sold through standard brokerage accounts and used within common investment workflows.

Roundhill’s filing also explains why the funds may behave differently from many traditional ETFs. It warns that as the contracts approach settlement, prices may converge quickly and cause sharp net asset value moves. “This convergence will result in a sudden and substantial increase or decrease in the value of the Fund’s NAV, which is highly unique among other investment products,” the filing said.

Risk Warnings and Regulation Remain Central to the Proposal

Roundhill told investors that the fund tied to the winning election outcome seeks “capital appreciation,” but it warned the other five ETFs could lose almost all their value. This is because event contracts can settle to a binary outcome, and contracts tied to losing results can fall toward zero as settlement nears.

The filing also says US rules governing event contracts are “evolving,” and it warns that any change in how event contracts are classified or restricted could affect the funds. “Political outcome event contracts have been the subject of heightened regulatory scrutiny and debate,” the filing said, adding that regulators may decide certain contracts should be limited, modified, suspended, or prohibited. 

It also states that investors who are not comfortable with regulatory uncertainty should avoid purchasing shares. On Feb. 5, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission withdrew a prior proposal that would have restricted certain sports and political prediction market contracts. The policy debate remains active, and the SEC’s review will be closely watched because the filing seeks to place event contracts inside a registered ETF structure.

The post Eric Balchunas Says Roundhill Election ETFs Could Be Potentially Groundbreaking Soon appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
SOON Logo
SOON Price(SOON)
$0.1818
$0.1818$0.1818
-1.19%
USD
SOON (SOON) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Tether CEO Delivers Rare Bitcoin Price Comment

Tether CEO Delivers Rare Bitcoin Price Comment

Bitcoin price receives rare acknowledgement from Tether CEO Ardoino
Share
Coinstats2025/09/17 23:39
Michael Saylor Sparks Frenzy With Cryptic “99>98” Post Hinting at Another Massive Bitcoin Buy

Michael Saylor Sparks Frenzy With Cryptic “99>98” Post Hinting at Another Massive Bitcoin Buy

Michael Saylor Hints at Another Bitcoin Purchase With Cryptic “99>98” Message Michael Saylor has once again ignited speculation across cryptocurrency markets
Share
Hokanews2026/02/16 01:04