The post Bitcoin Shows Greater Weakness Than Post-LUNA Crash; Is a Crash Below $60K Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On-chain analytics firm GlassnodeThe post Bitcoin Shows Greater Weakness Than Post-LUNA Crash; Is a Crash Below $60K Next? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On-chain analytics firm Glassnode

Bitcoin Shows Greater Weakness Than Post-LUNA Crash; Is a Crash Below $60K Next?

On-chain analytics firm Glassnode has reiterated the current weakness in Bitcoin’s price action, noting that there is less demand for the leading crypto now compared to after the LUNA crash in 2022. This indicates that another Bitcoin crash may be on the cards, with a potential drop below the psychological $60,000 level likely to trigger massive liquidations.

Glassnode Hints Another Bitcoin Crash May Be Imminent

In an X post, Glassnode noted that the long-term holder (LTH) Cost Basis Distribution (CBD) Heatmap maps supply density across price levels. The platform further stated that the recent support above $65,000 is anchored in the 2024 H1 accumulation range and that this demand has absorbed recent sell pressure.

Glassnode warned that a decisive break below this level would likely open the path for a Bitcoin crash toward the Realized Price at around $54,000. In another X post, the analytics platform noted that during BTC’s first sharp leg down in November 2025, the market absorbed heavy sell pressure aggressively, which was similar to what happened after the LUNA and FTX crashes.

Meanwhile, although the recent Bitcoin crash to $60,000 led to some accumulation, Glassnode stated that it was notably weaker than the November 2025 bounce or the reflexive demand seen after the LUNA collapse. The platform also noted that the recent crash imposed drastic psychological pressure on these long-term holders, similar to the LUNA crash.

In both cases, the 7-day EMA of the LTH Spent Output Profit Ratio (SOPR) fell below 1 after trading for one to two years above it. Basically, long-term holders are seeing significant losses, a “rare shift in conviction” that Glassnode noted typically happens in the deeper stages of bear markets.

As CoinGape reported earlier, Glassnode flagged a structural weakness following the recent Bitcoin crash. The platform noted that BTC spot volumes are structurally weak and depressed, creating a demand vacuum and accelerating realized losses. It is worth noting that, in addition to a potential drop to the Realized Price at around $54,000, experts such as veteran trader Peter Brandt have warned that BTC could crash to as low as $40,000 as the bear market deepens.

The Bottom Is Still Not In

On-chain analytics platform CryptoQuant indicated that BTC has not yet reached a bottom despite these Bitcoin crashes. In a research report, the platform noted that the Realized price support at around $55,000 has not yet been tested.

The report further stated that the BTC price is still trading above this realized price. In past cycles, Bitcoin fell 24% to 30% below the realized price, followed by four to six months of base formation, reinforcing the view that durable bottoms are time-intensive processes rather than single-day capitulation events.

CryptoQuant further noted that LTH behavior does not reflect capitulation, as these holders are currently selling at a breakeven level. However, in past cycles, bear market bottoms have formed after holders endured 30% to 40% losses, indicating that a further Bitcoin crash remains on the cards before a full reset.

Another reason CryptoQuant is confident that Bitcoin hasn’t yet found a bottom is that market cycle indicators remain in the Bear Phase and not the Extreme Bear Phase. This Extreme Bear Phase historically marks the start of the bottoming processes and typically lasts for several months.

It is worth noting that a Bitcoin crash below $60,000 could trigger a liquidation cascade based on activity in the options market. Deribit data shows that the largest cluster of put options is around the $58,000 level. A drop below this crucial support level could liquidate several positions.

Source: https://coingape.com/bitcoin-shows-greater-weakness-than-post-luna-crash-is-a-crash-below-60k-next/

Market Opportunity
Terra Logo
Terra Price(LUNA)
$0.06618
$0.06618$0.06618
-2.97%
USD
Terra (LUNA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Yunfeng Financial appoints Jiang Guofei as Chairman of Web3 Development Committee

Yunfeng Financial appoints Jiang Guofei as Chairman of Web3 Development Committee

PANews reported on September 19th that the South China Morning Post reported that Jack Ma-backed Yunfeng Financial Group has appointed former Ant Group executive Geoff Jiang Guofei as Chairman of its Web3 Development Committee, further clarifying its strategic layout in the Web3 space. Jiang Guofei previously led Ant Group's blockchain project, Trusple , and served as Director of the DAMO Academy's Fintech Lab. Yunfeng recently completed its first real-world asset ( RWA ) tokenization project and purchased 10,000 Ethereum (ETH) for $ 44 million as a strategic reserve, with plans to promote tokenized solutions across multiple asset classes.
Share
PANews2025/09/19 18:01
Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price

XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price

The post XRP holders hit new high, but THIS keeps pressure on price appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ripple [XRP] remains one of the top five cryptocurrencies
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/17 08:49