Quick HighlightsFOCIL aims to prevent an oligopoly of Ethereum validators.Critics fear legal risks for U.S. validators under FOCIL.Buterin's vision: Ethereum as a neutral ”dumb pipe” free from control.Ethereum's New Proposal: Vitalik Buterin Defends EIP-7805 Against CriticismEthereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin responded to criticism of the EIP-7805 (FOCIL) mechanism, a proposal designed to ensure Ethereum's first level (L1) remains a neutral network. This mechanism is intended to prevent the formation of an oligopoly among builders, preserving Ethereum's decentralized nature.The EIP-7805 proposal was brought to light by user Amin Soleimani. It’s important to note that Buterin himself is the author of the FOCIL concept, which was submitted for consideration in November 2024. Although the proposal is still in draft status and awaiting approval, it has already stirred significant controversy.FOCIL, aimed at combating Ethereum’s centralization, involves introducing 16 additional validators per slot. One validator would have the authority to determine the order of transactions, although all proposed transfers would still be included in the block.But Soleimani voiced concerns about the potential risks this could bring to validators, arguing that the implementation of this mechanism would increase legal liabilities, particularly for those operating in the U.S. Ethereum’s anti-censorship measures have so far allowed node operators to avoid the inclusion of transactions involving sanctioned services like Tornado Cash, only delaying their processing rather than excluding them entirely.Is Ethereum's Neutrality at Risk with FOCIL? The Legal Debate ExplainedSoleimani argued that under FOCIL, validators would no longer be able to filter out transactions from sanctioned services. He expressed concern that this could expose U.S. validators to legal risks. Soleimani noted:”If I were the U.S. government, I would 100% support FOCIL. It means I can arrest any U.S. validator, confiscate their assets, and prosecute them for violating sanctions.”Buterin responded to these criticisms by emphasizing that the goal of FOCIL was to protect Ethereum's L1 status as a ”dumb pipe” — a neutral network that only transmits data without controlling it.Buterin’s Vision: Why Ethereum Must Stay a ‘Dumb Pipe’Buterin firmly believes that forcing validators to include sanctioned transactions is necessary for Ethereum's long-term health. He stressed that Ethereum's L1 must remain neutral, free from interference by any single entity, including validators. This neutrality is achieved by introducing several safeguards:Ensuring the mempool is stable and functional for simple block creation.Creating non-protocol technologies for distributed block construction.Establishing multiple channels to enable transactions.FOCIL is one of the latest mechanisms to achieve these goals. Buterin argues that it provides benefits to both validators and attesters, making the latter's work simpler from a technical standpoint.Can FOCIL Secure Ethereum’s Decentralized Future?With the potential adoption of EIP-7701, Buterin envisions expanding FOCIL’s capabilities to further eliminate centralized intermediaries. The ultimate goal is to prevent an oligopoly of validators from gaining veto power over which transactions get included in blocks.In response, Soleimani emphasized that Ethereum was never intended to be a “passive channel.” For him, Buterin’s vision of Ethereum as a neutral pipe is an ideal that fails to reflect the reality of Ethereum’s current status.Quick HighlightsFOCIL aims to prevent an oligopoly of Ethereum validators.Critics fear legal risks for U.S. validators under FOCIL.Buterin's vision: Ethereum as a neutral ”dumb pipe” free from control.Ethereum's New Proposal: Vitalik Buterin Defends EIP-7805 Against CriticismEthereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin responded to criticism of the EIP-7805 (FOCIL) mechanism, a proposal designed to ensure Ethereum's first level (L1) remains a neutral network. This mechanism is intended to prevent the formation of an oligopoly among builders, preserving Ethereum's decentralized nature.The EIP-7805 proposal was brought to light by user Amin Soleimani. It’s important to note that Buterin himself is the author of the FOCIL concept, which was submitted for consideration in November 2024. Although the proposal is still in draft status and awaiting approval, it has already stirred significant controversy.FOCIL, aimed at combating Ethereum’s centralization, involves introducing 16 additional validators per slot. One validator would have the authority to determine the order of transactions, although all proposed transfers would still be included in the block.But Soleimani voiced concerns about the potential risks this could bring to validators, arguing that the implementation of this mechanism would increase legal liabilities, particularly for those operating in the U.S. Ethereum’s anti-censorship measures have so far allowed node operators to avoid the inclusion of transactions involving sanctioned services like Tornado Cash, only delaying their processing rather than excluding them entirely.Is Ethereum's Neutrality at Risk with FOCIL? The Legal Debate ExplainedSoleimani argued that under FOCIL, validators would no longer be able to filter out transactions from sanctioned services. He expressed concern that this could expose U.S. validators to legal risks. Soleimani noted:”If I were the U.S. government, I would 100% support FOCIL. It means I can arrest any U.S. validator, confiscate their assets, and prosecute them for violating sanctions.”Buterin responded to these criticisms by emphasizing that the goal of FOCIL was to protect Ethereum's L1 status as a ”dumb pipe” — a neutral network that only transmits data without controlling it.Buterin’s Vision: Why Ethereum Must Stay a ‘Dumb Pipe’Buterin firmly believes that forcing validators to include sanctioned transactions is necessary for Ethereum's long-term health. He stressed that Ethereum's L1 must remain neutral, free from interference by any single entity, including validators. This neutrality is achieved by introducing several safeguards:Ensuring the mempool is stable and functional for simple block creation.Creating non-protocol technologies for distributed block construction.Establishing multiple channels to enable transactions.FOCIL is one of the latest mechanisms to achieve these goals. Buterin argues that it provides benefits to both validators and attesters, making the latter's work simpler from a technical standpoint.Can FOCIL Secure Ethereum’s Decentralized Future?With the potential adoption of EIP-7701, Buterin envisions expanding FOCIL’s capabilities to further eliminate centralized intermediaries. The ultimate goal is to prevent an oligopoly of validators from gaining veto power over which transactions get included in blocks.In response, Soleimani emphasized that Ethereum was never intended to be a “passive channel.” For him, Buterin’s vision of Ethereum as a neutral pipe is an ideal that fails to reflect the reality of Ethereum’s current status.

Vitalik Buterin Defends Ethereum's Future Against Centralization with EIP-7805

2025/08/25 18:27
3 min read

Quick Highlights

  • FOCIL aims to prevent an oligopoly of Ethereum validators.
  • Critics fear legal risks for U.S. validators under FOCIL.
  • Buterin's vision: Ethereum as a neutral ”dumb pipe” free from control.

Ethereum's New Proposal: Vitalik Buterin Defends EIP-7805 Against Criticism

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin responded to criticism of the EIP-7805 (FOCIL) mechanism, a proposal designed to ensure Ethereum's first level (L1) remains a neutral network. This mechanism is intended to prevent the formation of an oligopoly among builders, preserving Ethereum's decentralized nature.

The EIP-7805 proposal was brought to light by user Amin Soleimani. It’s important to note that Buterin himself is the author of the FOCIL concept, which was submitted for consideration in November 2024. Although the proposal is still in draft status and awaiting approval, it has already stirred significant controversy.

FOCIL, aimed at combating Ethereum’s centralization, involves introducing 16 additional validators per slot. One validator would have the authority to determine the order of transactions, although all proposed transfers would still be included in the block.

But Soleimani voiced concerns about the potential risks this could bring to validators, arguing that the implementation of this mechanism would increase legal liabilities, particularly for those operating in the U.S. Ethereum’s anti-censorship measures have so far allowed node operators to avoid the inclusion of transactions involving sanctioned services like Tornado Cash, only delaying their processing rather than excluding them entirely.

Soleimani argued that under FOCIL, validators would no longer be able to filter out transactions from sanctioned services. He expressed concern that this could expose U.S. validators to legal risks. Soleimani noted:

Buterin responded to these criticisms by emphasizing that the goal of FOCIL was to protect Ethereum's L1 status as a ”dumb pipe” — a neutral network that only transmits data without controlling it.

Buterin’s Vision: Why Ethereum Must Stay a ‘Dumb Pipe’

Buterin firmly believes that forcing validators to include sanctioned transactions is necessary for Ethereum's long-term health. He stressed that Ethereum's L1 must remain neutral, free from interference by any single entity, including validators. This neutrality is achieved by introducing several safeguards:

  • Ensuring the mempool is stable and functional for simple block creation.
  • Creating non-protocol technologies for distributed block construction.
  • Establishing multiple channels to enable transactions.

FOCIL is one of the latest mechanisms to achieve these goals. Buterin argues that it provides benefits to both validators and attesters, making the latter's work simpler from a technical standpoint.

Can FOCIL Secure Ethereum’s Decentralized Future?

With the potential adoption of EIP-7701, Buterin envisions expanding FOCIL’s capabilities to further eliminate centralized intermediaries. The ultimate goal is to prevent an oligopoly of validators from gaining veto power over which transactions get included in blocks.

In response, Soleimani emphasized that Ethereum was never intended to be a “passive channel.” For him, Buterin’s vision of Ethereum as a neutral pipe is an ideal that fails to reflect the reality of Ethereum’s current status.

Market Opportunity
NODE Logo
NODE Price(NODE)
$0.01527
$0.01527$0.01527
-0.26%
USD
NODE (NODE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) shared progress in crypto regulation: how can innovative exemptions and tokenized securities frameworks provide a clear regulatory pat

The Chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) shared progress in crypto regulation: how can innovative exemptions and tokenized securities frameworks provide a clear regulatory pat

Author: Paul S. Atkins, Chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Compiled by Wu Shuo Blockchain Aki This article is a transcript of a conversation
Share
PANews2026/02/20 23:30
Solar and Internet from Space: The Future of Global Connectivity and Energy Supply

Solar and Internet from Space: The Future of Global Connectivity and Energy Supply

Quiptik broke his promise to post weekly articles on HackerNoon. He was unable to access the internet and electricity in his home country for some reasons. Until we fix power and internet access, many voices will keep going unheard.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/18 14:47
Bitcoin 8% Gains Already Make September 2025 Its Second Best

Bitcoin 8% Gains Already Make September 2025 Its Second Best

The post Bitcoin 8% Gains Already Make September 2025 Its Second Best appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key points: Bitcoin is bucking seasonality trends by adding 8%, making this September its best since 2012. September 2025 would need to see 20% upside to become Bitcoin’s strongest ever. BTC price volatility is at levels rarely seen before in an unusual bull cycle. Bitcoin (BTC) has gained more this September than any year since 2012, a new bull market record. Historical price data from CoinGlass and BiTBO confirms that at 8%, Bitcoin’s September 2025 upside is its second-best ever. Bitcoin avoiding “Rektember” with 8% gains September is traditionally Bitcoin’s weakest month, with average losses of around 8%. BTC/USD monthly returns (screenshot). Source: CoinGlass This year, the stakes are high for BTC price seasonality, as historical patterns demand the next bull market peak and other risk assets set repeated new all-time highs. While both gold and the S&P 500 are in price discovery, BTC/USD has coiled throughout September after setting new highs of its own the month prior. Even at “just” 8%, however, this September’s performance is currently enough to make it Bitcoin’s strongest in 13 years. The only time that the ninth month of the year was more profitable for Bitcoin bulls was in 2012, when BTC/USD gained about 19.8%. Last year, upside topped out at 7.3%. BTC/USD monthly returns. Source: BiTBO BTC price volatility vanishes The figures underscore a highly unusual bull market peak year for Bitcoin. Related: BTC ‘pricing in’ what’s coming: 5 things to know in Bitcoin this week Unlike previous bull markets, BTC price volatility has died off in 2025, against the expectations of longtime market participants based on prior performance. CoinGlass data shows volatility dropping to levels not seen in over a decade, with a particularly sharp drop from April onward. Bitcoin historical volatility (screenshot). Source: CoinGlass Onchain analytics firm Glassnode, meanwhile, highlights the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 11:09