The post MIT-educated brothers contest use of Google searches in $25M crypto fraud case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The two Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) graduates accused of stealing $25 million worth of crypto are trying to block federal prosecutors from adding Google search history in court as evidence. According to a motion filed in a Manhattan Federal court on Friday by Anton and James Peraire-Bueno, searches for “top crypto lawyers” and “wire fraud statute of limitations” are irrelevant and prejudicial to their case.  The searches were reportedly made when the brothers were in consultations with their attorneys after the alleged theft. Per the defense, this history “cannot demonstrate intent to commit fraud.” US District Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke will have to decide if the searches can be admissible in court. Search history is not evidence, defense attest According to federal prosecutors, the searches show consciousness of guilt from the defendants. But the Peraire-Bueno brothers insist they are just part of a prudent legal consultation during an ongoing investigation. Court documents show one search for “top crypto lawyers” occurred the same day the brothers first contacted their legal counsel. Per the two MIT grads’ attorneys, if prosecutors use the searches, it will undercut the government’s argument that they are guilty.  “For the government to argue its preferred inference, the government would first need to establish that any given search was connected to this case,” the filing stated. “But the contents of the searches themselves do not show that.” Alex Chandra, a partner at Indonesian-based IGNOS Law Alliance firm, said Google search histories can be used as hints, “but they’re context-dependent.”  “The mere fact that someone googled something isn’t automatic proof of intent or guilt,” he explained, adding that searches conducted before a crime can suggest planning. However, those made afterward are not really profound indicators of intent.  MIT brothers exploited Ethereum’s MEV, prosecution says According to a US… The post MIT-educated brothers contest use of Google searches in $25M crypto fraud case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The two Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) graduates accused of stealing $25 million worth of crypto are trying to block federal prosecutors from adding Google search history in court as evidence. According to a motion filed in a Manhattan Federal court on Friday by Anton and James Peraire-Bueno, searches for “top crypto lawyers” and “wire fraud statute of limitations” are irrelevant and prejudicial to their case.  The searches were reportedly made when the brothers were in consultations with their attorneys after the alleged theft. Per the defense, this history “cannot demonstrate intent to commit fraud.” US District Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke will have to decide if the searches can be admissible in court. Search history is not evidence, defense attest According to federal prosecutors, the searches show consciousness of guilt from the defendants. But the Peraire-Bueno brothers insist they are just part of a prudent legal consultation during an ongoing investigation. Court documents show one search for “top crypto lawyers” occurred the same day the brothers first contacted their legal counsel. Per the two MIT grads’ attorneys, if prosecutors use the searches, it will undercut the government’s argument that they are guilty.  “For the government to argue its preferred inference, the government would first need to establish that any given search was connected to this case,” the filing stated. “But the contents of the searches themselves do not show that.” Alex Chandra, a partner at Indonesian-based IGNOS Law Alliance firm, said Google search histories can be used as hints, “but they’re context-dependent.”  “The mere fact that someone googled something isn’t automatic proof of intent or guilt,” he explained, adding that searches conducted before a crime can suggest planning. However, those made afterward are not really profound indicators of intent.  MIT brothers exploited Ethereum’s MEV, prosecution says According to a US…

MIT-educated brothers contest use of Google searches in $25M crypto fraud case

The two Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) graduates accused of stealing $25 million worth of crypto are trying to block federal prosecutors from adding Google search history in court as evidence.

According to a motion filed in a Manhattan Federal court on Friday by Anton and James Peraire-Bueno, searches for “top crypto lawyers” and “wire fraud statute of limitations” are irrelevant and prejudicial to their case. 

The searches were reportedly made when the brothers were in consultations with their attorneys after the alleged theft. Per the defense, this history “cannot demonstrate intent to commit fraud.” US District Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke will have to decide if the searches can be admissible in court.

Search history is not evidence, defense attest

According to federal prosecutors, the searches show consciousness of guilt from the defendants. But the Peraire-Bueno brothers insist they are just part of a prudent legal consultation during an ongoing investigation.

Court documents show one search for “top crypto lawyers” occurred the same day the brothers first contacted their legal counsel. Per the two MIT grads’ attorneys, if prosecutors use the searches, it will undercut the government’s argument that they are guilty. 

“For the government to argue its preferred inference, the government would first need to establish that any given search was connected to this case,” the filing stated. “But the contents of the searches themselves do not show that.”

Alex Chandra, a partner at Indonesian-based IGNOS Law Alliance firm, said Google search histories can be used as hints, “but they’re context-dependent.” 

“The mere fact that someone googled something isn’t automatic proof of intent or guilt,” he explained, adding that searches conducted before a crime can suggest planning. However, those made afterward are not really profound indicators of intent. 

MIT brothers exploited Ethereum’s MEV, prosecution says

According to a US Department of Justice statement on the case, the brothers are accused of exploiting Ethereum’s Maximal Extractible Value (MEV) boost system in April 2023. They allegedly intercepted private transactions and manipulated them to siphon $25 million in just 12 seconds.

“And once they put their plan into action, their heist only took 12 seconds to complete,” US Attorney Damian Williams mentioned in his press briefing.

Authorities say the brothers targeted Ethereum traders by altering pending transactions, allowing them to divert the crypto funds before the trades were finalized. Court filings further reveal that the pair retained legal counsel immediately after being contacted by anonymous “sandwich attackers” who demanded the return of the stolen funds.

Anton was detained in Boston, while James was booked in New York during their arrest in May last year. In the afternoon of their indictment, the former appeared before US Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson in Massachusetts. James faced US Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo in the Southern District of New York.

“As alleged in today’s indictment, the Peraire-Bueno brothers stole $25 million in Ethereum cryptocurrency through a technologically sophisticated, cutting-edge scheme they plotted for months and executed in seconds,” Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco told reporters at the time of their indictment.

Defense files other motions to scrap evidence

The Peraire-Bueno brothers also moved to exclude several other pieces of evidence. They asked the court to block prosecutors from introducing news articles that contain “inflammatory descriptions” of them as inadmissible hearsay.

Motion to exclude Twitter screenshot as evidence. Source: CourtListener.

Moreover, they sought to prevent the government from using a screenshot from X that allegedly shows a “false signature.” The screenshot was originally posted by pseudonymous Paradigm crypto researcher “Samczsun.” Defense attorneys are trying to convince the court that prosecutors cannot properly authenticate the image, and that they should admit it would be prejudicial.

If you’re reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/brothers-google-searches-in-25m-crypto-fcase/

Market Opportunity
Gravity Logo
Gravity Price(G)
$0.004727
$0.004727$0.004727
-2.61%
USD
Gravity (G) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

VivoPower To Load Up On XRP At 65% Discount: Here’s How

VivoPower To Load Up On XRP At 65% Discount: Here’s How

VivoPower International, a Nasdaq-listed B-Corp now pivoting to an XRP-centric treasury, said on September 16 it has structured its mining and treasury operations so that it can acquire the token “at up to a 65% discount” to prevailing market prices—by mining other proof-of-work assets and swapping those mined tokens. VivoPower Doubles Down On XRP The […]
Share
Bitcoinist2025/09/18 10:00
Today’s Wordle #1671 Hints And Answer For Thursday, January 15

Today’s Wordle #1671 Hints And Answer For Thursday, January 15

The post Today’s Wordle #1671 Hints And Answer For Thursday, January 15 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. How to solve today’s Wordle. SOPA Images/LightRocket
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/15 09:05
CME Group to launch options on XRP and SOL futures

CME Group to launch options on XRP and SOL futures

The post CME Group to launch options on XRP and SOL futures appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. CME Group will offer options based on the derivative markets on Solana (SOL) and XRP. The new markets will open on October 13, after regulatory approval.  CME Group will expand its crypto products with options on the futures markets of Solana (SOL) and XRP. The futures market will start on October 13, after regulatory review and approval.  The options will allow the trading of MicroSol, XRP, and MicroXRP futures, with expiry dates available every business day, monthly, and quarterly. The new products will be added to the existing BTC and ETH options markets. ‘The launch of these options contracts builds on the significant growth and increasing liquidity we have seen across our suite of Solana and XRP futures,’ said Giovanni Vicioso, CME Group Global Head of Cryptocurrency Products. The options contracts will have two main sizes, tracking the futures contracts. The new market will be suitable for sophisticated institutional traders, as well as active individual traders. The addition of options markets singles out XRP and SOL as liquid enough to offer the potential to bet on a market direction.  The options on futures arrive a few months after the launch of SOL futures. Both SOL and XRP had peak volumes in August, though XRP activity has slowed down in September. XRP and SOL options to tap both institutions and active traders Crypto options are one of the indicators of market attitudes, with XRP and SOL receiving a new way to gauge sentiment. The contracts will be supported by the Cumberland team.  ‘As one of the biggest liquidity providers in the ecosystem, the Cumberland team is excited to support CME Group’s continued expansion of crypto offerings,’ said Roman Makarov, Head of Cumberland Options Trading at DRW. ‘The launch of options on Solana and XRP futures is the latest example of the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:56