Two MIT-educated brothers accused of stealing $25 million in crypto through a blockchain exploit are pushing to keep their Google search history out of court.
Key Takeaways:
Anton and James Peraire-Bueno want their Google searches excluded, arguing they reflect legal consultations.
Prosecutors allege the brothers exploited Ethereum’s MEV-boost system to steal $25 million.
Each brother faces up to 20 years in prison per count if convicted.
Anton and James Peraire-Bueno filed the motion on Friday in Manhattan federal court, arguing that prosecutors are trying to use ordinary queries as proof of criminal intent.
They said searches for “top crypto lawyers” and “wire fraud statute of limitations” were conducted during privileged consultations with attorneys following the alleged April 2023 exploit.
MIT Brothers Argue Google Searches Are ‘Unfairly Prejudicial’ in $25M Crypto Case
The brothers claim the searches are “unfairly prejudicial” and have no evidentiary weight without proper context.
U.S. District Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke must now decide whether the searches reflect guilt or routine steps to obtain legal advice.
The brothers were arrested in May 2024 on conspiracy, wire fraud, and money laundering charges.
Prosecutors say they used their technical expertise to manipulate Ethereum’s MEV-boost system, intercepting private transactions and diverting $25 million in just 12 seconds.
The Department of Justice described it as a “first-of-its-kind manipulation of the Ethereum blockchain.”
Court filings reveal the pair sought legal help immediately after being “threatened by anonymous sandwich attackers” demanding repayment of the funds.
A search for “top crypto lawyers” occurred on the same day as outreach to counsel, according to privilege logs submitted to the court.
The defense argues prosecutors have no witnesses to connect the searches to criminal intent. “The contents of the searches themselves do not show that,” the motion said, adding that any inference of guilt would be “purely speculative.”
The defense also moved to exclude certain news articles as hearsay and asked the court to block a Twitter screenshot of their alleged “false signature,” posted by pseudonymous researcher samczsun, saying prosecutors cannot authenticate the image.
If convicted, Anton and James Peraire-Bueno each face up to 20 years in prison per count in what could become a landmark case for blockchain exploitation and U.S. crypto law.
GMX to Compensate $44M After $42M Arbitrum Exploit
Earlier this month, decentralized perpetuals exchange GMX announced it would distribute $44 million to fully compensate Arbitrum GLP holders impacted by last month’s $42 million exploit.
Compensation will be made in GLV tokens, with additional rewards for users who hold them for three months. The payout includes recovered funds and $2 million from GMX’s treasury.
The July 9 breach stemmed from a reentrancy vulnerability in GMX V1’s contract structure, which allowed the attacker to manipulate assets-under-management calculations and drain the GLP pool.
The exploit was tied to the way V1 handled pricing across separate contracts, a flaw corrected in GMX V2. The attacker later returned 90% of the stolen funds after GMX offered a white-hat bountyTwo MIT-educated brothers accused of stealing $25 million in crypto through a blockchain exploit are pushing to keep their Google search history out of court.
Key Takeaways:
Anton and James Peraire-Bueno want their Google searches excluded, arguing they reflect legal consultations.
Prosecutors allege the brothers exploited Ethereum’s MEV-boost system to steal $25 million.
Each brother faces up to 20 years in prison per count if convicted.
Anton and James Peraire-Bueno filed the motion on Friday in Manhattan federal court, arguing that prosecutors are trying to use ordinary queries as proof of criminal intent.
They said searches for “top crypto lawyers” and “wire fraud statute of limitations” were conducted during privileged consultations with attorneys following the alleged April 2023 exploit.
MIT Brothers Argue Google Searches Are ‘Unfairly Prejudicial’ in $25M Crypto Case
The brothers claim the searches are “unfairly prejudicial” and have no evidentiary weight without proper context.
U.S. District Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke must now decide whether the searches reflect guilt or routine steps to obtain legal advice.
The brothers were arrested in May 2024 on conspiracy, wire fraud, and money laundering charges.
Prosecutors say they used their technical expertise to manipulate Ethereum’s MEV-boost system, intercepting private transactions and diverting $25 million in just 12 seconds.
The Department of Justice described it as a “first-of-its-kind manipulation of the Ethereum blockchain.”
Court filings reveal the pair sought legal help immediately after being “threatened by anonymous sandwich attackers” demanding repayment of the funds.
A search for “top crypto lawyers” occurred on the same day as outreach to counsel, according to privilege logs submitted to the court.
The defense argues prosecutors have no witnesses to connect the searches to criminal intent. “The contents of the searches themselves do not show that,” the motion said, adding that any inference of guilt would be “purely speculative.”
The defense also moved to exclude certain news articles as hearsay and asked the court to block a Twitter screenshot of their alleged “false signature,” posted by pseudonymous researcher samczsun, saying prosecutors cannot authenticate the image.
If convicted, Anton and James Peraire-Bueno each face up to 20 years in prison per count in what could become a landmark case for blockchain exploitation and U.S. crypto law.
GMX to Compensate $44M After $42M Arbitrum Exploit
Earlier this month, decentralized perpetuals exchange GMX announced it would distribute $44 million to fully compensate Arbitrum GLP holders impacted by last month’s $42 million exploit.
Compensation will be made in GLV tokens, with additional rewards for users who hold them for three months. The payout includes recovered funds and $2 million from GMX’s treasury.
The July 9 breach stemmed from a reentrancy vulnerability in GMX V1’s contract structure, which allowed the attacker to manipulate assets-under-management calculations and drain the GLP pool.
The exploit was tied to the way V1 handled pricing across separate contracts, a flaw corrected in GMX V2. The attacker later returned 90% of the stolen funds after GMX offered a white-hat bounty
MIT Brothers Accused in $25M Crypto Heist Seek to Block Google Search Evidence
Two MIT-educated brothers accused of stealing $25 million in crypto through a blockchain exploit are pushing to keep their Google search history out of court.
Key Takeaways:
- Anton and James Peraire-Bueno want their Google searches excluded, arguing they reflect legal consultations.
- Prosecutors allege the brothers exploited Ethereum’s MEV-boost system to steal $25 million.
- Each brother faces up to 20 years in prison per count if convicted.
Anton and James Peraire-Bueno filed the motion on Friday in Manhattan federal court, arguing that prosecutors are trying to use ordinary queries as proof of criminal intent.
They said searches for “top crypto lawyers” and “wire fraud statute of limitations” were conducted during privileged consultations with attorneys following the alleged April 2023 exploit.
MIT Brothers Argue Google Searches Are ‘Unfairly Prejudicial’ in $25M Crypto Case
The brothers claim the searches are “unfairly prejudicial” and have no evidentiary weight without proper context.
U.S. District Judge Jessica G.L. Clarke must now decide whether the searches reflect guilt or routine steps to obtain legal advice.
The brothers were arrested in May 2024 on conspiracy, wire fraud, and money laundering charges.
Prosecutors say they used their technical expertise to manipulate Ethereum’s MEV-boost system, intercepting private transactions and diverting $25 million in just 12 seconds.
The Department of Justice described it as a “first-of-its-kind manipulation of the Ethereum blockchain.”
Court filings reveal the pair sought legal help immediately after being “threatened by anonymous sandwich attackers” demanding repayment of the funds.
A search for “top crypto lawyers” occurred on the same day as outreach to counsel, according to privilege logs submitted to the court.
The defense argues prosecutors have no witnesses to connect the searches to criminal intent. “The contents of the searches themselves do not show that,” the motion said, adding that any inference of guilt would be “purely speculative.”
The defense also moved to exclude certain news articles as hearsay and asked the court to block a Twitter screenshot of their alleged “false signature,” posted by pseudonymous researcher samczsun, saying prosecutors cannot authenticate the image.
If convicted, Anton and James Peraire-Bueno each face up to 20 years in prison per count in what could become a landmark case for blockchain exploitation and U.S. crypto law.
GMX to Compensate $44M After $42M Arbitrum Exploit
Earlier this month, decentralized perpetuals exchange GMX announced it would distribute $44 million to fully compensate Arbitrum GLP holders impacted by last month’s $42 million exploit.
Compensation will be made in GLV tokens, with additional rewards for users who hold them for three months. The payout includes recovered funds and $2 million from GMX’s treasury.
The July 9 breach stemmed from a reentrancy vulnerability in GMX V1’s contract structure, which allowed the attacker to manipulate assets-under-management calculations and drain the GLP pool.
The exploit was tied to the way V1 handled pricing across separate contracts, a flaw corrected in GMX V2. The attacker later returned 90% of the stolen funds after GMX offered a white-hat bounty.
Market Opportunity
Blockstreet Price(BLOCK)
$0.015548
$0.015548$0.015548
USD
Blockstreet (BLOCK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
You May Also Like
What John Harbaugh And Mike Tomlin’s Departures Mean For NFL Coaching
The post What John Harbaugh And Mike Tomlin’s Departures Mean For NFL Coaching appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Baltimore Ravens head coach John Harbaugh (L
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/15 10:56
Twitter founder's "weekend experiment": Bitchat encryption software becomes a "communication Noah's Ark"
Author: Nancy, PANews In the crypto world, both assets and technologies are gradually taking center stage with greater practical significance. In the past few months
Share
PANews2026/01/15 11:00
Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill
BitcoinWorld Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with significant developments as Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong recently took to Washington, D.C., advocating passionately for a clearer regulatory path. His mission? To champion the passage of a vital crypto market structure bill, specifically the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act. This legislative push is not just about policy; it’s about safeguarding investor rights and fostering innovation in the digital asset space. Why a Clear Crypto Market Structure Bill is Essential Brian Armstrong’s visit underscores a growing sentiment within the crypto industry: the urgent need for regulatory clarity. Without clear guidelines, the market operates in a gray area, leaving both innovators and investors vulnerable. The proposed crypto market structure bill aims to bring much-needed definition to this dynamic sector. Armstrong explicitly stated on X that this legislation is crucial to prevent a recurrence of actions that infringe on investor rights, citing past issues with former U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler. This proactive approach seeks to establish a stable and predictable environment for digital assets. Understanding the CLARITY Act: A Blueprint for Digital Assets The Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act is designed to establish a robust regulatory framework for the cryptocurrency industry. It seeks to delineate the responsibilities of key regulatory bodies, primarily the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Here are some key provisions: Clear Jurisdiction: The bill aims to specify which digital assets fall under the purview of the SEC as securities and which are considered commodities under the CFTC. Investor Protection: By defining these roles, the act intends to provide clearer rules for market participants, thereby enhancing investor protection. Exemption Conditions: A significant aspect of the bill would exempt certain cryptocurrencies from the stringent registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, provided they meet specific criteria. This could reduce regulatory burdens for legitimate projects. This comprehensive approach promises to bring structure to a rapidly evolving market. The Urgency Behind the Crypto Market Structure Bill The call for a dedicated crypto market structure bill is not new, but Armstrong’s direct engagement highlights the increasing pressure for legislative action. The lack of a clear framework has led to regulatory uncertainty, stifling innovation and sometimes leading to enforcement actions that many in the industry view as arbitrary. Passing this legislation would: Foster Innovation: Provide a clear roadmap for developers and entrepreneurs, encouraging new projects and technologies. Boost Investor Confidence: Offer greater certainty and protection for individuals investing in digital assets. Prevent Future Conflicts: Reduce the likelihood of disputes between regulatory bodies and crypto firms, creating a more harmonious ecosystem. The industry believes that a well-defined regulatory landscape is essential for the long-term health and growth of the digital economy. What a Passed Crypto Market Structure Bill Could Mean for You If the CLARITY Act or a similar crypto market structure bill passes, its impact could be profound for everyone involved in the crypto space. For investors, it could mean a more secure and transparent market. For businesses, it offers a predictable environment to build and scale. Conversely, continued regulatory ambiguity could: Stifle Growth: Drive innovation overseas and deter new entrants. Increase Risks: Leave investors exposed to unregulated practices. Create Uncertainty: Lead to ongoing legal battles and market instability. The stakes are incredibly high, making the advocacy efforts of leaders like Brian Armstrong all the more critical. The push for a clear crypto market structure bill is a pivotal moment for the digital asset industry. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong’s efforts in Washington, D.C., reflect a widespread desire for regulatory clarity that protects investors, fosters innovation, and ensures the long-term viability of cryptocurrencies. The CLARITY Act offers a potential blueprint for this future, aiming to define jurisdictional boundaries and streamline regulatory requirements. Its passage could unlock significant growth and stability, cementing the U.S. as a leader in the global digital economy. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What is the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act? The CLARITY Act is a proposed crypto market structure bill aimed at establishing a clear regulatory framework for digital assets in the U.S. It seeks to define the roles of the SEC and CFTC and exempt certain cryptocurrencies from securities registration requirements under specific conditions. Why is Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong advocating for this bill? Brian Armstrong is advocating for the CLARITY Act to bring regulatory certainty to the crypto industry, protect investor rights from unclear enforcement actions, and foster innovation within the digital asset space. He believes it’s crucial for the industry’s sustainable growth. How would this bill impact crypto investors? For crypto investors, the passage of this crypto market structure bill would mean greater clarity on which assets are regulated by whom, potentially leading to enhanced consumer protections, reduced market uncertainty, and a more stable investment environment. What are the primary roles of the SEC and CFTC concerning this bill? The bill aims to delineate the responsibilities of the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) regarding digital assets. It seeks to clarify which assets fall under securities regulation and which are considered commodities, reducing jurisdictional ambiguity. What could happen if a crypto market structure bill like CLARITY Act does not pass? If a clear crypto market structure bill does not pass, the industry may continue to face regulatory uncertainty, potentially leading to stifled innovation, increased legal challenges for crypto companies, and a less secure environment for investors due to inconsistent enforcement and unclear rules. Did you find this article insightful? Share it with your network to help spread awareness about the crucial discussions shaping the future of digital assets! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping crypto regulation and institutional adoption. This post Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 20:35