On Feb. 5, the Presidential Communications Office announced that President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr. had issued Executive Order (EO) 108 that abolished the OfficeOn Feb. 5, the Presidential Communications Office announced that President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr. had issued Executive Order (EO) 108 that abolished the Office

On EO 108, the Office of the Executive Secretary, and sustained growth challenge

2026/02/19 00:02
5 min read

On Feb. 5, the Presidential Communications Office announced that President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr. had issued Executive Order (EO) 108 that abolished the Office of the Special Assistant to the President for Investment and Economic Affairs (OSAPIEA) and transferred its powers, functions, and duties to the Office of the Executive Secretary.

The OSAPIEA was created in 2023 under EO 49 and it was headed by Secretary Frederick D. Go. Mr. Go was appointed Finance Secretary last November and he has more duties and powers there.

Executive Secretary Ralph G. Recto, who was the former Finance Secretary, will now have more duties. Aside from overall monitoring and evaluation of all departments and agencies of the Executive branch, the OES will also streamline the Office of the President’s investment and economic affairs functions and promote comprehensive approaches to address current and future economic challenges.

SUSTAINING GROWTH
I checked the growth numbers of East Asia in contrast with those of Europe. I averaged the GDP growth rates into three-year clusters from 2011-2013, 2014-2016, etc. until the last three years. The results are contained in the accompanying table. The highlights are:

1. From 2011 to 2019, the Philippines’s trend was that of high growth along with Vietnam — we were the two fastest growing economies in the ASEAN-6 and just trailing China in the rest of East Asia.

2. Our draconian lockdown from 2020-2021 was horribly wrong. Vietnam and China, along with Taiwan, were able to grow in those years while the Philippines shrank by 9.5% in 2020, the worst in Asia, and the worst in Philippine economic history since post-WW2. Our average growth in 2020-2022 was only 1.3%.

3. We managed to grow above 5% in 2023-2024, but the infrastructure corruption scandal has dragged on 2025’s growth. Nonetheless our average of 5.2% growth in the 2023-2025 period was higher than the rest of the ASEAN-6 and other East Asian dragon economies. The detractors and pessimists are wrong in belittling our recent economic performance.

4. Degrowth is the trend in several European countries, particularly Germany and Austria, while Italy, France, and UK may fall into that trap soon.

Many European nations are focused on globalist agendas like saving the planet; saving Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion; saving Ukraine; and saving illegal immigrants. High growth, saving their jobs, businesses, and industrialization seem to have taken the back seat.

The main economic challenge for the Philippines is how to sustain an average GDP of 5-6%, if not attain 7% and not slip to 4% or lower. To help attain this, here are some Do’s and Don’ts that we should take note of.

1. There should be no more lockdowns and mandatory vaccinations regardless of how strong the globalist medical community and pharma lobby would be, should another big virus emerge.

2. We should not save the planet or save DEI, but rather save our jobs and businesses in order to save the hungry. The national agenda of promoting economic prosperity should not be subsumed under the globalist agenda of promoting ecological central planning.

3. We should follow the growth path, the economic and energy policies, of our East Asian neighbors and not that of Europe or North America. In 2025 all major East Asian nations grew above 3% except Thailand, Japan, and South Korea. This is an indicator that our region remains the most dynamic, the most prosperity-oriented in the world.

4. Finally, promoting the rule of law — that the law applies equally to unequal people and sectors, that no one is exempt and no one can grant an exemption — should be the single biggest function of governments.

In the “social contract” theory elaborated by the philosophers John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the main purpose government was invented was to secure people’s three basic rights — the right to life, the right to private property, and the right to liberty. There was no right to healthcare, right to education until university, right to monthly cash and food aid, and so on.

These new “rights” are modern inventions developed after societies progressed as a result of the protection of people’s three basic rights. These three basic rights made people very productive, very self-reliant, and not state- or welfare-dependent.

The infrastructure corruption scandal, the endless welfare-subsidy programs that lead to the endless expansion of our public debt, the ever-rising annual interest payments, and ever-rising taxes someday can be addressed if we have more rule of law.

The Office of the Executive Secretary, which is in charge of monitoring that all departments and agencies do their mandated tasks, and as head of overall investments and economic liberalization policies, has to meet high expectations from the public and from key investment actors. It has limited leeway given limited time, but it is working silently and efficiently to meet such expectations.

Bienvenido S. Oplas, Jr. is the president of Bienvenido S. Oplas, Jr. Research Consultancy Services, and Minimal Government Thinkers. He is an international fellow of the Tholos Foundation.

minimalgovernment@gmail.com

Market Opportunity
Orderly Network Logo
Orderly Network Price(ORDER)
$0.0574
$0.0574$0.0574
-2.71%
USD
Orderly Network (ORDER) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Stellar’s Origin Story Matters Again As Tokenized XLM Dollars Move Mainstream

Stellar’s Origin Story Matters Again As Tokenized XLM Dollars Move Mainstream

Stellar Lumens is easy to misread because its “introduction” was never a pitch for a general-purpose crypto computer. From the very start, it framed itself as
Share
Coinstats2026/02/19 06:21
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Tutor Perini Announces Conference Call to Discuss Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Results

Tutor Perini Announces Conference Call to Discuss Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Results

LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Tutor Perini Corporation (NYSE: TPC) (the “Company”), a leading civil, building and specialty construction company, announced today
Share
AI Journal2026/02/19 07:15