TLDR Bitcoin spot ETFs saw $133.3 million in daily net outflows, with BlackRock’s IBIT losing $84.2 million and Fidelity’s FBTC shedding $49 million. Ether spotTLDR Bitcoin spot ETFs saw $133.3 million in daily net outflows, with BlackRock’s IBIT losing $84.2 million and Fidelity’s FBTC shedding $49 million. Ether spot

Solana ETFs Post Inflows as Bitcoin, Ether, XRP Suffer Outflows

2026/02/19 18:34
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

TLDR

  • Bitcoin spot ETFs saw $133.3 million in daily net outflows, with BlackRock’s IBIT losing $84.2 million and Fidelity’s FBTC shedding $49 million.
  • Ether spot ETFs experienced $41.8 million in net outflows, driven primarily by BlackRock’s ETHA, which lost nearly $30 million.
  • XRP ETFs posted $2.2 million in outflows, with total net assets across XRP funds just over $1 billion, or 1.2% of XRP’s market cap.
  • Solana spot ETFs recorded $2.4 million in net inflows, contrasting with the broader market trend of outflows in major crypto ETFs.
  • Despite a cautious market, Solana ETFs have seen nearly $880 million in cumulative inflows, led by Bitwise’s BSOL with $1.5 million in new capital.

Cryptocurrency exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the U.S. faced outflows across major assets, with Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP seeing significant daily losses. However, Solana ETFs bucked the trend, recording modest inflows. As of February 18, Bitcoin spot ETFs experienced $133.3 million in daily net outflows, with both Ether and XRP following suit.

Bitcoin ETFs Experience Major Outflows

Bitcoin ETFs saw major outflows, totaling $133.3 million in net losses on February 18. BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) was the hardest hit, losing $84.2 million. Fidelity’s Bitcoin ETF (FBTC) followed closely with $49 million in outflows.

Despite the outflows, Bitcoin ETFs still hold $83.6 billion in net assets, representing about 6.3% of Bitcoin’s market cap. However, the recent outflows suggest a shift in investor sentiment as institutional exposure appears to be trimming down.

Ether ETFs Mirror Bitcoin’s Losses

Ether ETFs faced a similar pattern, with $41.8 million in net outflows on the same day. BlackRock’s Ethereum ETF (ETHA) saw the largest drop, shedding nearly $30 million. Total net assets across Ethereum funds now stand at $11.1 billion, or 4.8% of Ether’s market cap.

Ether’s price struggles below $2,000, which has affected ETF performance. Investors had hoped for stronger momentum, especially with expectations of potential rate cuts later this year.

Solana ETFs Record Modest Inflows

Solana ETFs, in contrast, bucked the trend of outflows. On February 18, Solana spot ETFs saw $2.4 million in net inflows. Bitwise’s BSOL led the charge, adding $1.5 million in fresh capital.

With nearly $880 million in cumulative inflows, Solana ETFs have gained attention despite the broader risk-off environment in the crypto market. The inflows, while modest, indicate a shift toward specific assets such as Solana rather than a broad market-wide retreat.

While Bitcoin, Ether, and XRP ETFs faced losses, smaller altcoins such as Solana have seen inflows. This selective interest reflects investor positioning, as some continue to allocate to certain cryptocurrencies. Solana’s ability to stand out amid this period of market caution highlights its growing appeal to institutional investors.

The post Solana ETFs Post Inflows as Bitcoin, Ether, XRP Suffer Outflows appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
XRP Logo
XRP Price(XRP)
$1.4371
$1.4371$1.4371
-1.75%
USD
XRP (XRP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
‘Customers are awake’- Eric Trump slams banks over stablecoin yield opposition

‘Customers are awake’- Eric Trump slams banks over stablecoin yield opposition

The post ‘Customers are awake’- Eric Trump slams banks over stablecoin yield opposition appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Eric Trump, the son of U.S. President
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/05 18:19
Pi Network (PI) climbs on Pi Day update, token unlocks risk

Pi Network (PI) climbs on Pi Day update, token unlocks risk

Pi Network (PI) rally as Bitcoin meets $74,000 resistance Pi Network’s PI outperformed the broader crypto market, notching a multi-week high while Bitcoin stalled
Share
CoinLive2026/03/05 18:39