The post Optimism (OP) sinks 20% as Base leaves OP Stack; fees end appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Base leaves OP Stack; OP token price drops over 20% BaseThe post Optimism (OP) sinks 20% as Base leaves OP Stack; fees end appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Base leaves OP Stack; OP token price drops over 20% Base

Optimism (OP) sinks 20% as Base leaves OP Stack; fees end

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Base leaves OP Stack; OP token price drops over 20%

Base, the Coinbase-backed Ethereum Layer 2 network, will migrate from Optimism’s OP Stack to a unified, self‑operated technology stack. The change centralizes its codebase and operational control.

Trade media described the transition as a technical re‑architecture designed to streamline upgrades and reduce external dependencies. The move focuses on autonomy and speed while remaining within the broader Ethereum ecosystem.

In immediate trading, the OP token fell more than 20% following the announcement, as reported by Decrypt (https://decrypt.co/358549/optimism-plunges-double-digits-amid-bases-tech-stack-overhaul). The selloff aligned with coverage that Base is moving toward a single internal stack rather than the shared OP Stack framework.

Why Base is adopting a unified, self-operated tech stack

A unified, self‑operated stack can accelerate releases and simplify governance across rollup components. As reported by news/crypto/news/32700/base-sends-optimism-to-the-bottom-transition-to-in-TfR1jqC_O?utm_source=openai” target=”_blank” rel=”nofollow noopener”>EGW News (https://egw.news/crypto/news/32700/base-sends-optimism-to-the-bottom-transition-to-in-TfR1jqC_O), the transition targets faster iteration through more frequent network upgrades.

“six hard forks per year,” said EGW News, describing the cadence Base is targeting to reduce complexity and speed development.

Operationally, this implies tighter change management for infra teams. market-chill-etherfi-migrates-to-Optimism?utm_source=openai” target=”_blank” rel=”nofollow noopener”>Whale Alert (https://whale-alert.io/stories/a08c01394b1245/Base-abandons-OP-Stack-forces-node-migration-and-keeps-sequencer-revenue-OP-plunges-amid-market-chill-etherfi-migrates-to-Optimism) noted node operators will need to migrate clients ahead of future hard forks to maintain compatibility with Base’s new stack.

BingX: a trusted exchange delivering real advantages for traders at every level.

The most direct financial change concerns sequencer revenue. MEXC News (https://www.mexc.com/news/749557) reported that Base’s move ends its revenue‑sharing arrangement with Optimism, meaning Base will retain sequencer revenues previously owed under the prior licensing model.

Cryptonomist (https://en.cryptonomist.ch/2026/02/19/crypto-markets-base-shift/) highlighted that Base historically contributed more than 90% of Superchain income to Optimism, magnifying the loss to OP’s ecosystem economics. This may prompt reassessment of Optimism’s funding sources and incentive structures.

Ecosystem cohesion is also at stake. Crypto.news (https://crypto.news/base-moves-away-from-optimism-stack-op-token-sinks/) described Base’s shift toward a self‑operated internal stack, a direction that could test Superchain alignment as participating chains weigh autonomy against shared standards.

For developers and operators, near‑term steps include validating dependency compatibility, aligning tooling with Base’s release cadence, and preparing client migrations ahead of planned forks. End‑users generally do not need to act unless they operate infrastructure or nodes.

FAQ about Base OP Stack

How did Base’s decision impact the OP token price and is the drop likely to persist?

OP fell more than 20% after the announcement, per Decrypt. Whether the drop persists depends on subsequent clarity around revenue flows and Superchain coordination. No deterministic outlook is implied.

What happens to sequencer revenue after Base’s move and how does this affect Optimism’s revenue model?

Base is set to retain sequencer revenue rather than share it with Optimism. This removes a material revenue stream and could pressure Optimism’s model until alternative funding or incentives are defined.

At the time of this writing, OP’s market response appears tied to Base’s architecture shift rather than a protocol failure.

Developers should track Base’s release schedule and migration notes before planned hard forks to avoid service disruptions.

Source: https://coincu.com/news/optimism-op-sinks-20-as-base-leaves-op-stack-fees-end/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
‘Customers are awake’- Eric Trump slams banks over stablecoin yield opposition

‘Customers are awake’- Eric Trump slams banks over stablecoin yield opposition

The post ‘Customers are awake’- Eric Trump slams banks over stablecoin yield opposition appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Eric Trump, the son of U.S. President
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/05 18:19
Pi Network (PI) climbs on Pi Day update, token unlocks risk

Pi Network (PI) climbs on Pi Day update, token unlocks risk

Pi Network (PI) rally as Bitcoin meets $74,000 resistance Pi Network’s PI outperformed the broader crypto market, notching a multi-week high while Bitcoin stalled
Share
CoinLive2026/03/05 18:39