White House Ultimatum March 1 CLARITY Act Could Explode or Collapse Over Stablecoin Yield Fight

White House Sets March 1 Deadline as Stablecoin Yield Dispute Stalls CLARITY Act Final Decision

The future of U.S. cryptocurrency market reform now rests on a single unresolved issue: whether stablecoin issuers and crypto platforms should be allowed to offer yield on customer balances.

After months of negotiations, the White House has set March 1 as the deadline to break the impasse that has stalled progress on the CLARITY Act, a sweeping market structure bill designed to define regulatory oversight for digital assets in the United States. Officials familiar with the discussions say talks have narrowed significantly, but a final compromise on stablecoin yield rules has yet to be reached.

Without agreement, the broader legislative effort remains frozen, delaying what many lawmakers and industry leaders describe as a critical framework for the next phase of U.S. digital asset regulation.

Stablecoin Yield Debate Emerges as Central Obstacle

At the heart of the delay is a contentious question: Should stablecoin issuers or trading platforms be permitted to provide interest-like rewards to users holding idle balances?

Source: CryptosRus Official

Traditional banking groups argue that allowing stablecoin yields would effectively transform crypto platforms into deposit-taking institutions without subjecting them to the same regulatory safeguards as banks. They warn that offering rewards on digital dollar balances could siphon deposits away from commercial banks, increasing systemic financial risks.

Crypto industry representatives counter that prohibiting yield mechanisms would stifle innovation and reduce competitiveness in the global digital asset market. They argue that carefully structured reward programs, particularly those tied to network activity rather than passive holding, could coexist with financial stability measures.

The disagreement has emerged as the final hurdle blocking the CLARITY Act’s advancement.

Third Closed-Door Meeting Signals Narrowing Gaps

On February 20, 2026, senior White House officials convened a third closed-door meeting aimed at resolving the dispute. Participants included executives from major crypto firms such as Coinbase and Ripple, venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, commonly known as a16z, and representatives from leading U.S. banking associations.

Sources briefed on the session described it as “constructive,” noting that negotiators have begun exploring a potential middle ground. One proposal under discussion would limit passive yield offerings on stablecoin balances while allowing rewards linked to active network participation, such as transaction-based incentives.

Draft language reportedly being circulated would place oversight authority across multiple agencies, including the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.S. Treasury Department, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Penalties for noncompliance could reach as high as $500,000 per day, underscoring the seriousness of enforcement mechanisms under consideration.

While no final agreement was reached during the third session, participants indicated that positions are closer than in previous rounds.

Earlier Meetings Marked by Tension

The March 1 deadline follows two prior negotiation sessions that failed to produce consensus.

The first meeting brought together a wide range of stakeholders from both the banking and crypto sectors. According to individuals present, discussions became tense, with both sides expressing concerns about competitive imbalances and regulatory arbitrage. The session concluded without a clear framework for compromise.

A second meeting held on February 10 also fell short of delivering an agreement, though it reportedly clarified the specific points of contention surrounding yield structures and supervisory authority.

The third meeting narrowed the focus almost entirely to the mechanics of stablecoin rewards, signaling that other aspects of the CLARITY Act may already have broad alignment.

Why the CLARITY Act Matters

The CLARITY Act is designed to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital commodities and other crypto assets. A central objective of the bill is to delineate responsibilities between federal agencies, particularly granting expanded oversight to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission for certain categories of digital assets.

Proponents argue that clearer regulatory boundaries would reduce uncertainty, encourage responsible innovation, and attract institutional capital that has remained cautious due to fragmented oversight.

Market participants are closely watching the outcome. On prediction platform Polymarket, odds recently suggested an 85 percent probability that the legislation would pass by 2026, reflecting growing optimism that lawmakers can bridge remaining gaps.

Industry Voices Express Conditional Optimism

Executives within the crypto sector have signaled confidence that a compromise could be reached.

Brad Garlinghouse, chief executive of Ripple, has indicated publicly that if stablecoin yield rules are finalized, the broader bill could pass as early as April. Several senators, including Bernie Moreno, have echoed that timeline, emphasizing bipartisan interest in resolving regulatory ambiguity.

Analysts estimate that even limited reward structures could generate between $10 billion and $20 billion in annual revenue for crypto platforms. At the same time, structured guardrails could help mitigate risks to the traditional banking system.

Banking advocates maintain that safeguards must ensure stablecoin issuers maintain sufficient reserves and transparency. Crypto leaders argue that a rigid ban on rewards would push innovation overseas, potentially ceding competitive advantage to jurisdictions with more flexible frameworks.

Stablecoin Market Faces Heightened Uncertainty

The debate unfolds against the backdrop of a rapidly expanding stablecoin market valued at approximately $307 billion. Stablecoins serve as a bridge between traditional finance and decentralized ecosystems, facilitating trading, cross-border payments, and on-chain financial applications.

Regulatory uncertainty has periodically introduced volatility across digital asset markets. A failure to resolve the yield dispute by March 1 could prolong ambiguity, potentially affecting investor confidence and capital allocation decisions.

Market observers note that prolonged delays could dampen momentum not only for stablecoins but also for broader digital commodity markets that depend on legislative clarity.

Geopolitical Tensions Add Additional Complexity

Complicating the domestic legislative timeline are escalating geopolitical tensions between the United States and Iran.

The United States has deployed significant military assets to the Middle East, including aircraft carriers, fighter jets, naval destroyers, and additional troop contingents. The mobilization represents one of the largest force movements in the region in more than two decades.

While no formal authorization for military action has been issued, officials have indicated that contingency plans are in place. Iran has responded by warning the United Nations Security Council that any attack would prompt retaliatory action against U.S. bases in the region, including facilities on Diego Garcia.

Analysts caution that any major escalation could shift Washington’s legislative priorities, potentially delaying final decisions on financial reform measures, including the CLARITY Act.

Balancing Innovation and Stability

The core issue facing policymakers is how to balance technological innovation with systemic financial stability.

Supporters of yield-bearing stablecoins argue that digital finance has evolved beyond simple tokenized dollars and that reward mechanisms are integral to competitive market dynamics. They contend that appropriate disclosures, reserve requirements, and capital standards can address risk concerns.

Opponents warn that blurring the line between banking products and crypto services without equivalent oversight could create vulnerabilities similar to those observed in past financial crises.

Regulators are therefore attempting to craft language that preserves innovation while preventing regulatory gaps.

Countdown to March 1

With the White House-imposed March 1 deadline approaching, negotiators face mounting pressure to deliver a resolution. A timely compromise could unlock the CLARITY Act’s final decision and provide long-awaited regulatory clarity for digital assets in the United States.

If consensus is reached, the legislation could move swiftly through the remaining legislative steps, potentially reshaping the American crypto landscape within months.

If talks collapse, however, uncertainty may persist across the stablecoin sector and broader digital asset markets, leaving investors, institutions, and innovators navigating an unsettled regulatory environment.

For now, the outcome hinges on whether policymakers can reconcile competing visions of how stablecoins should function within the U.S. financial system.

The coming days may determine not only the fate of the CLARITY Act but also the trajectory of digital finance regulation in the world’s largest economy.

hokanews.com – Not Just Crypto News. It’s Crypto Culture.

Writer @Erlin
Erlin is an experienced crypto writer who loves to explore the intersection of blockchain technology and financial markets. She regularly provides insights into the latest trends and innovations in the digital currency space.
 
 Check out other news and articles on Google News

Disclaimer:

The articles published on hokanews are intended to provide up-to-date information on various topics, including cryptocurrency and technology news. The content on our site is not intended as an invitation to buy, sell, or invest in any assets. We encourage readers to conduct their own research and evaluation before making any investment or financial decisions.
hokanews is not responsible for any losses or damages that may arise from the use of information provided on this site. Investment decisions should be based on thorough research and advice from qualified financial advisors. Information on HokaNews may change without notice, and we do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the content published.