Donald Trump is caught in a "serious" bind where he must either launch a full-scale conflict with Iran or risk looking weak, according to Michael Wolff, but WhiteDonald Trump is caught in a "serious" bind where he must either launch a full-scale conflict with Iran or risk looking weak, according to Michael Wolff, but White

Trump in a 'serious' bind as he’s caught between looking weak or being 'bored': biographer

2026/02/20 20:02
3 min read

Donald Trump is caught in a "serious" bind where he must either launch a full-scale conflict with Iran or risk looking weak, according to Michael Wolff, but White House sources indicate that one thing he "hates" might spare the U.S. another war.

Wolff is a veteran reporter and writer, best known for his 2018 book, Fire & Fury, which chronicled the chaos of Trump's first term based on insider accounts and sources. He still maintains access to sources within the White House and offers their insight to help explain what motivates Trump and how he operates.

During the latest episode of his Daily Beast podcast, "Inside Trump's Head," Wolff and co-host Joanna Coles discussed Trump's escalation of military threats against Iran. The administration has been antagonizing the Middle Eastern nation for the better part of a year, bombing its nuclear facilities, threatening retaliation for violence against protesters and, currently, threatening what observers predict will be a full-scale war if nuclear negotiations fall through.

According to Wolff, all these threats against Iran have put Trump in an extremely tough position. Ideally, he would prefer to avoid a war, but if his demands are not met by Iran, he risks looking weak if he backs down.

“I think he’s got himself in somewhat of a serious pickle here,” Wolff explained. “You know, if he doesn’t go at this point, I mean, he kind of really looks weak and he’s already backpedaled this quite a bit.”

He continued: "He invited all of those protesters into the street under the banner basically of his protection. ‘Help is on the way, warnings to the Iranian regime: If you attack the protesters, you will have to answer to Donald Trump. Then, of course, they did attack the protesters at a level beyond anyone’s imagination. And Trump, what did he do? Nothing. What does that make him look like? Or he can go forward. But the problem of going forward — which is why he didn’t go forward the first time — is that it’s very complicated.”

There is one aspect of going to war, however, that Trump "hates," and which might help keep him from starting a conflict in Iran. According to White House sources who spoke to Wolff, Trump largely dislikes the actual process of carrying out a war.

"It’s too complicated for him. He doesn’t like to listen to generals," Wolff said. "All of the generals are kind of McKinsey-trained guys. He hates that. It’s boring to him. So it’s a difficult moment for him to go forward in attacking Iran on a pretty massive scale, I think is the implication.”

He concluded: "I think he’s caught in the middle of this, you know—he can’t back down because then he’s going to look weak. He doesn’t want to go forward because it’s so complicated.”

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Market Opportunity
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logo
OFFICIAL TRUMP Price(TRUMP)
$3.537
$3.537$3.537
+4.06%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Thunderclap Review 2026: Is it the Best Social Media Service for Instant Gains?

Thunderclap Review 2026: Is it the Best Social Media Service for Instant Gains?

TLDR: Is Thunderclap legit? Yes, Thunderclap is a legitimate social media growth service designed to help users increase their followers, engagement, and overall
Share
AI Journal2026/02/20 21:10
The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The post The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Healthy competition drives innovation and better products for consumers; it is at the center of American economic leadership. Unfortunately, now that the bipartisan GENIUS Act has been signed into law, major legacy financial institutions seem to be having second thoughts about the innovations that stablecoins can bring to financial markets. Bank lobbying groups and public affairs teams have been peppering Congress with complaints about the law, urging members to reopen debate and introduce changes to the legislation that will ensure the stablecoin market doesn’t grow too quickly, protecting banks’ profits and stifling consumer choice. This reactionary response is both overblown and unnecessary. What legacy financial firms should do instead is embrace competition and offer exciting new products and services that consumers want, not try to kneecap emerging players through anti-innovation rules and regulations. The GENIUS Act was carefully designed with a thorough bipartisan process to strengthen consumer safeguards, ensure regulatory oversight, and preserve financial stability. Efforts to roll back its provisions are less about protecting families and more about protecting entrenched banking interests from the competition that helps ensure the U.S. banking system stays the strongest and most innovative in the world. Critics warn that allowing stablecoins to provide rewards could lead to massive deposit outflows from community banks, with figures as high as $6.6 trillion cited. But closer examination shows this fear is unfounded. A July 2025 analysis by consulting firm Charles River Associates found no statistically significant relationship between stablecoin adoption and community bank deposit outflows. In fact, the overwhelming majority of stablecoin reserves remain in the traditional financial system — either in commercial bank accounts or in short-term Treasuries — where they continue to support liquidity and credit in the broader U.S. economy. The dire estimates rely on unrealistic assumptions that every dollar of stablecoin issuance permanently…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:39
What next for XRP as volatility sinks to 2024 lows

What next for XRP as volatility sinks to 2024 lows

Markets Share Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail
What next for XRP as volatility sinks to 202
Share
Coindesk2026/02/20 21:08