Bitdeer sold its BTC; Wu allows future holdings
According to Blockonomi, bitcoin mining company Bitdeer sold all corporate Bitcoin reserves and now reports zero BTC on its balance sheet. The outlet also notes Bitdeer’s self‑managed hashrate has surpassed Marathon Digital, signaling a shift in competitive positioning. The move consolidates a strategy centered on operational scale over treasury exposure.
As reported by Bitget News, Bitdeer reduced corporate holdings to zero after selling 189.8 BTC from recent production and liquidating 943.1 BTC in reserves. Those figures indicate a decisive treasury reset rather than incremental trimming.
For miners, selling inventory can fund operating expenses, de‑risk volatility, and extend capital‑expenditure runway. Zero‑treasury exposure removes mark‑to‑market swings from corporate results but forgoes potential upside. That trade‑off can be rational when expansion or cost control takes priority.
Management framed the current balance as situational rather than a permanent policy. Jihan Wu, Chairman and CEO of Bitdeer, said, “this does not mean [we] won’t hold Bitcoin in the future,” as reported by Youtocoin.
Practically, optionality allows rebuilding reserves if economics align with growth, hedging, or stakeholder preferences. Timing would likely depend on internal liquidity needs and market conditions.
Near term, cash proceeds enhance liquidity for power costs, infrastructure, and hardware commitments. Eliminating BTC inventory reduces earnings volatility tied to price moves and may simplify risk disclosures.
Post‑halving margin compression can be mitigated by stronger balance‑sheet cash and scale efficiency, while zero holdings cap direct downside from BTC drawdowns. Conversely, the company would not capture upside from price appreciation unless it reaccumulates.
At the time of this writing, Bitcoin (BTC) was about $67,268, based on data from Phemex. That backdrop frames the trade‑off between near‑term liquidity and potential treasury optionality.
Comparison with Marathon Digital (MARA) and peers
Self-managed hashrate surpasses MARA: context and implications
Leadership in self‑managed hashrate indicates greater control over operations versus reliance on third‑party pools. It can support lower unit costs and steadier output, aiding cash‑flow predictability. Cross‑cycle resilience often hinges on scale, energy strategy, and fleet efficiency, which this change underscores.
Treasury stance differences: zero reserves vs holding policies
Bitdeer’s zero‑reserve posture stands apart from miners that retain a portion of mined BTC as treasury. Holding can align with long‑term bull theses but adds balance‑sheet volatility; zero‑reserve improves liquidity and narrows exposure. Peers calibrate between these poles to match risk tolerance and financing plans.
FAQ about Bitdeer zero BTC holdings
What did Jihan Wu say about future Bitcoin holdings, and what conditions might trigger reaccumulation?
Wu said zero BTC now does not preclude future holdings. Reaccumulation triggers were not specified; typical drivers include liquidity needs, market conditions, capex timing, and risk objectives.
How does Bitdeer’s zero-BTC stance affect cash flow, capex plans, and risk management ahead of/after halving?
It bolsters cash flow and capex flexibility, reduces mark‑to‑market risk, and can cushion halving‑related margin pressure, while forgoing upside from BTC appreciation unless reserves are rebuilt.
| DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. We encourage you to do your own research before investing. |
Source: https://coincu.com/news/bitcoin-miners-rethink-cash-as-bitdeer-cuts-btc-to-zero/
