As subcontractor ecosystems expand, Nunery argues that treating AI as day-one operationalinfrastructure is critical to keeping work moving, preventing delays, andAs subcontractor ecosystems expand, Nunery argues that treating AI as day-one operationalinfrastructure is critical to keeping work moving, preventing delays, and

illumend Founder and CEO Kristen Nunery Challenges How Businesses Think About AI’s Role in Third-Party Insurance Compliance

2026/02/23 19:45
10 min read

As subcontractor ecosystems expand, Nunery argues that treating AI as day-one operational
infrastructure is critical to keeping work moving, preventing delays, and accelerating trust
between partners

Key Takeaways

According to illumend Founder and CEO Kristen Nunery, AI reshapes third-party insurance compliance in the following ways:

  • AI improves third-party insurance compliance by creating shared clarity for owners, operators, and partners—not simply by increasing speed or automating paperwork.
  • Third-party insurance compliance is often the first operational signal of whether a project, deal, or engagement will actually move forward on time.
  • Legacy third-party insurance compliance systems hinder partnerships by introducing ambiguity that leads to resubmissions, delayed starts, and last-minute surprises once work is scheduled to begin.
  • AI accelerates partnerships by standardizing how insurance requirements are interpreted and by making compliance outcomes clear and visible to everyone involved, before crews, vendors, or service providers are waiting.
  • Businesses that treat third-party insurance compliance as relationship infrastructure reduce friction early, avoid stalled onboarding, and scale partnerships without disrupting timelines or margins.

INDIANAPOLIS, Feb. 23, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — illumend™, the next-generation AI platform redefining how companies manage third-party risk and insurance compliance, today announced the publication of a new article by its founder and CEO, Kristen Nunery, that challenges the dominant view of AI as primarily an efficiency tool in third-party insurance compliance. Nunery argues that AI plays a far more consequential role for businesses in construction, real estate, manufacturing, and other industries that depend on contractors, vendors, and service partners to keep projects moving forward, especially at the very start of a working relationship.

As subcontractor lists grow, projects accelerate, and onboarding timelines shrink, businesses today have far less tolerance for delays or ambiguity in third-party insurance compliance. In her article, Nunery reframes AI’s role for owners, operators, and managers responsible for getting work started, arguing that the earliest signals of partnership success or failure emerge inside compliance workflows, often before a job site opens or a contract generates revenue.

When AI is treated merely as a tool to process certificates faster, Nunery contends, businesses miss its strategic role as operational infrastructure that creates shared clarity, consistent interpretation, and alignment at the outset of third-party relationships. Without that foundation, she asserts, trust erodes before work begins, partnerships slow, and costly delays or stop-and-go onboarding issues accumulate long before anyone labels them a risk problem.

“AI is usually talked about as a way to speed up compliance because the work has always been about paperwork,” said Nunery. “But the real risk businesses face today is jobs that can’t start and vendors who don’t know what’s missing until it’s too late. When requirements are applied consistently and explained clearly, partners know exactly where they stand from day one. That certainty keeps onboarding moving, prevents costly delays, and allows partnerships to scale without disrupting timelines or margins.”

Below is the full article by Kristen Nunery, which outlines why third-party insurance compliance has become one of the most overlooked sources of partnership friction for growing businesses, and how AI is quietly turning it into a strategic advantage.

Rethinking AI’s Role in Third-Party Insurance Compliance as Partnership Acceleration

By Kristen Nunery, Founder and CEO, illumend

Most business leaders talk about AI in third-party insurance compliance the same way they talk about any new technology: speed, efficiency, cost savings.

That lens misses what’s actually at stake.

The real impact of AI in third-party insurance compliance has nothing to do with how fast documents move through a system. It has everything to do with whether partnerships ever get off the ground, and whether they survive once they do. When compliance delays a project start or holds up a vendor, the cost is immediate and tangible.

In industries like construction, real estate, manufacturing, and other sectors that depend on complex networks of contractors, vendors, and service partners, those delays translate directly into idle crews, missed timelines, and strained relationships.

Third-party insurance compliance is no longer a back-office function. It is the first operational test of trust between businesses.

Compliance Has Always Been a Relationship Problem. We Just Treated It Like Paperwork.

For decades, third-party insurance compliance was designed as a control mechanism. Collect the certificate. Check the box. Flag the exception. Move on.

These systems assumed friction was normal. Delays were acceptable. Ambiguity was unavoidable.

Requirements were captured, but not interpreted consistently. Decisions were issued, but rarely explained. Third parties were told what was wrong without understanding why. Owners and project teams were left answering questions they didn’t create, while schedules quietly slipped. Internally, teams spent more time clarifying outcomes than managing risk.

At scale, this wasn’t just inefficient. It quietly damaged trust before partnerships ever began. That damage represents a form of hidden business risk that doesn’t show up as a compliance failure, but as delayed starts, idle crews, strained vendor relationships, or projects that stall after contracts are signed.

Because compliance isn’t neutral. It sends a signal.

It tells vendors and partners whether expectations are clear or arbitrary. Whether decisions are principled or subjective. Whether problems will be surfaced early or discovered after a project is already supposed to be underway.

Long before performance is measured, compliance reveals how a relationship will actually function.

Why Legacy Compliance Systems Break Partnerships at Scale

Most compliance failures aren’t caused by bad actors or missing coverage. They’re caused by systems that rely on human interpretation to do work that demands consistency.

Legacy platforms digitize documents but leave judgment fragmented. One reviewer approves what another rejects. One exception escalates; another disappears. Outcomes arrive through emails and ticket queues instead of a shared system of record. This fragmentation does more than create friction. It conceals risk. Leaders see compliance achieved, while teams absorb the cost of rework, delay, and escalating exceptions that surface only when a project or service engagement is ready to begin.

A common scenario plays out: a partner clears onboarding, work begins, and only then does a coverage gap or exclusion surface. This can force a stop, a scramble to fix insurance, or a renegotiation under pressure. At that point, compliance looks like the problem, even though the real failure was misalignment at the start.

As partner ecosystems grow, this inconsistency compounds. Onboarding slows. Trust erodes. Friction becomes normalized.

Not because risk increased but because alignment disappeared.

When partners don’t share the same understanding of requirements, compliance stops protecting relationships and starts undermining them.

What Actually Makes AI a Partnership Accelerator

AI becomes transformational in third-party insurance compliance only when it replaces interpretation with alignment.

Unlike legacy systems, AI doesn’t just store requirements; it understands them. It consistently evaluates coverage against defined standards. It surfaces gaps early, explains outcomes clearly, and creates shared visibility across all stakeholders, before work is delayed or schedules are disrupted.

The difference is structural:

  • The same requirement is applied the same way every time
  • Issues are identified before work stalls
  • Both sides see the same compliance reality simultaneously

Compliance stops being a subjective judgment call and becomes a shared source of truth. Hidden risk becomes visible risk—early enough to act on, explain, and resolve while changes are still manageable and costs are still contained.

That’s when trust accelerates.

Not because standards are lowered but because expectations are finally clear.

Before AI, Compliance Felt Arbitrary. After AI, It Feels Designed.

Before AI, onboarding was a guessing game. Third parties submitted documents without knowing whether they were sufficient. Internal teams reinterpreted requirements. Exceptions bounced between inboxes. Delays accumulated without explanation.

After AI, the experience changes entirely.

Requirements are explicit. Decisions are explainable. Guidance replaces back-and-forth. Issues surface early, while they’re still easy to resolve.

The result isn’t just faster onboarding. It’s fewer strained relationships, fewer emergency fixes, and fewer partnerships that stall before real work begins.

The Shift Most Leaders Are Missing

The most forward-looking businesses no longer treat third-party insurance compliance as a gatekeeping process after contracts are signed. They are treating it as infrastructure—a system that determines whether partnerships scale smoothly or fracture under pressure.

When vendors, contractors, and service providers are extensions of a lean team, delays and ambiguity hit harder and cost more.

AI enables that shift not by automating paperwork, but by removing ambiguity.

Risk stops being something you react to after a problem emerges. It becomes something you anticipate and manage earlier, while trust is still being formed and timelines are still intact.

The Quiet Advantage of Getting This Right

The next decade will belong to companies that can scale partnerships without eroding trust. That doesn’t happen through policy documents or vendor handbooks. It happens through systems that create shared understanding from the very first interaction.

Third-party insurance compliance has long been one of the most overlooked sources of friction in modern business. It has also been one of the most overlooked sources of hidden business risk, until AI made that risk visible early enough to prevent delays, disruption, and rework.

When trust is built at the start, partnerships don’t just move faster. They last.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does AI change about third-party insurance compliance?
AI changes third-party insurance compliance by shifting it from a reactive checkpoint to proactive relationship infrastructure. According to Kristen Nunery, Founder and CEO of illumend, the primary impact is alignment created through consistent interpretation of requirements, explainable outcomes, and shared visibility before work begins or onboarding stalls.

How does AI-driven third-party insurance compliance accelerate partnerships instead of just speeding up paperwork?
AI-driven third-party insurance compliance accelerates partnerships by standardizing how insurance requirements are evaluated and explained across businesses. From Nunery’s perspective, this prevents repeated clarification, resubmissions, and last-minute fixes, allowing projects and partnerships to move forward without unnecessary delays.

Why do legacy COI systems create friction between businesses? 
Legacy COI systems create friction because they rely on manual review, subjective interpretation, and disconnected workflows. Nunery explains that while these systems store documents, they cannot consistently interpret requirements or explain decisions, causing issues to surface only after work is expected to begin.

Can AI-driven third-party insurance compliance improve trust without lowering standards?
AI-driven third-party insurance compliance can improve trust without lowering standards by applying requirements consistently and making outcomes explainable. According to Nunery, predictable and repeatable evaluation removes guesswork while preserving oversight so both sides know exactly where they stand, early.

About illumend
Founded in 2025, illumend™ is the most complete AI-powered platform transforming how businesses manage third-party insurance compliance and risk. Backed by myCOI, the leader in third-party insurance compliance management with more than 15 years of expertise, illumend reimagines compliance by guiding every step of the process—from document review and expiration tracking to risk flagging, communication and resolution—within one intuitive system. At its core is Lumie, illumend’s conversational AI guide that reads complex insurance documents, flags issues in real time and explains them in plain language, empowering anyone to take confident, informed action. To learn more, visit https://www.illumend.ai/.

Media contact:
Michael Tebo
Gabriel Marketing Group (for illumend)
Phone: 571-835-8775
Email: [email protected]

Cision View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/illumend-founder-and-ceo-kristen-nunery-challenges-how-businesses-think-about-ais-role-in-third-party-insurance-compliance-302693994.html

SOURCE illumend

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crucial US Stock Market Update: What Wednesday’s Mixed Close Reveals

Crucial US Stock Market Update: What Wednesday’s Mixed Close Reveals

BitcoinWorld Crucial US Stock Market Update: What Wednesday’s Mixed Close Reveals The financial world often keeps us on our toes, and Wednesday was no exception. Investors watched closely as the US stock market concluded the day with a mixed performance across its major indexes. This snapshot offers a crucial glimpse into current investor sentiment and economic undercurrents, prompting many to ask: what exactly happened? Understanding the Latest US Stock Market Movements On Wednesday, the closing bell brought a varied picture for the US stock market. While some indexes celebrated gains, others registered slight declines, creating a truly mixed bag for investors. The Dow Jones Industrial Average showed resilience, climbing by a notable 0.57%. This positive movement suggests strength in some of the larger, more established companies. Conversely, the S&P 500, a broader benchmark often seen as a barometer for the overall market, experienced a modest dip of 0.1%. The technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite also saw a slight retreat, sliding by 0.33%. This particular index often reflects investor sentiment towards growth stocks and the tech sector. These divergent outcomes highlight the complex dynamics currently at play within the American economy. It’s not simply a matter of “up” or “down” for the entire US stock market; rather, it’s a nuanced landscape where different sectors and company types are responding to unique pressures and opportunities. Why Did the US Stock Market See Mixed Results? When the US stock market delivers a mixed performance, it often points to a tug-of-war between various economic factors. Several elements could have contributed to Wednesday’s varied closings. For instance, positive corporate earnings reports from certain industries might have bolstered the Dow. At the same time, concerns over inflation, interest rate policies by the Federal Reserve, or even global economic uncertainties could have pressured growth stocks, affecting the S&P 500 and Nasdaq. Key considerations often include: Economic Data: Recent reports on employment, manufacturing, or consumer spending can sway market sentiment. Corporate Announcements: Strong or weak earnings forecasts from influential companies can significantly impact their respective sectors. Interest Rate Expectations: The prospect of higher or lower interest rates directly influences borrowing costs for businesses and consumer spending, affecting future profitability. Geopolitical Events: Global tensions or trade policies can introduce uncertainty, causing investors to become more cautious. Understanding these underlying drivers is crucial for anyone trying to make sense of daily market fluctuations in the US stock market. Navigating Volatility in the US Stock Market A mixed close, while not a dramatic downturn, serves as a reminder that market volatility is a constant companion for investors. For those involved in the US stock market, particularly individuals managing their portfolios, these days underscore the importance of a well-thought-out strategy. It’s important not to react impulsively to daily movements. Instead, consider these actionable insights: Diversification: Spreading investments across different sectors and asset classes can help mitigate risk when one area underperforms. Long-Term Perspective: Focusing on long-term financial goals rather than short-term gains can help weather daily market swings. Stay Informed: Keeping abreast of economic news and company fundamentals provides context for market behavior. Consult Experts: Financial advisors can offer personalized guidance based on individual risk tolerance and objectives. Even small movements in major indexes can signal shifts that require attention, guiding future investment decisions within the dynamic US stock market. What’s Next for the US Stock Market? Looking ahead, investors will be keenly watching for further economic indicators and corporate announcements to gauge the direction of the US stock market. Upcoming inflation data, statements from the Federal Reserve, and quarterly earnings reports will likely provide more clarity. The interplay of these factors will continue to shape investor confidence and, consequently, the performance of the Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq. Remaining informed and adaptive will be key to understanding the market’s trajectory. Conclusion: Wednesday’s mixed close in the US stock market highlights the intricate balance of forces influencing financial markets. While the Dow showed strength, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq experienced slight declines, reflecting a nuanced economic landscape. This reminds us that understanding the ‘why’ behind these movements is as important as the movements themselves. As always, a thoughtful, informed approach remains the best strategy for navigating the complexities of the market. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What does a “mixed close” mean for the US stock market? A1: A mixed close indicates that while some major stock indexes advanced, others declined. It suggests that different sectors or types of companies within the US stock market are experiencing varying influences, rather than a uniform market movement. Q2: Which major indexes were affected on Wednesday? A2: On Wednesday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 0.57%, while the S&P 500 edged down 0.1%, and the Nasdaq Composite slid 0.33%, illustrating the mixed performance across the US stock market. Q3: What factors contribute to a mixed stock market performance? A3: Mixed performances in the US stock market can be influenced by various factors, including specific corporate earnings, economic data releases, shifts in interest rate expectations, and broader geopolitical events that affect different market segments uniquely. Q4: How should investors react to mixed market signals? A4: Investors are generally advised to maintain a long-term perspective, diversify their portfolios, stay informed about economic news, and avoid impulsive decisions. Consulting a financial advisor can also provide personalized guidance for navigating the US stock market. Q5: What indicators should investors watch for future US stock market trends? A5: Key indicators to watch include upcoming inflation reports, statements from the Federal Reserve regarding monetary policy, and quarterly corporate earnings reports. These will offer insights into the future direction of the US stock market. Did you find this analysis of the US stock market helpful? Share this article with your network on social media to help others understand the nuances of current financial trends! To learn more about the latest stock market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping the US stock market‘s future performance. This post Crucial US Stock Market Update: What Wednesday’s Mixed Close Reveals first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 05:30
Trump suggests he wants to send Americans 'that don't work' to other countries

Trump suggests he wants to send Americans 'that don't work' to other countries

President Donald Trump suggested he would like to load up Americans "that don't work" in caravans and send them to other countries.At an event with so-called Angel
Share
Rawstory2026/02/24 00:07
Woodway Assurance unveils EviData 2.0 with new AI companion, EviChat

Woodway Assurance unveils EviData 2.0 with new AI companion, EviChat

OTTAWA, ON, Feb. 23, 2026 /PRNewswire/ – Today Woodway Assurance unveiled EviData™ 2.0, featuring EviChat™, a new AI companion that enhances the user experience
Share
AI Journal2026/02/24 00:32