Digital asset products saw $288M in outflows for a fifth straight week as ETP volumes slid to $17B. Bitcoin led withdrawals while select altcoins saw inflows.Digital asset products saw $288M in outflows for a fifth straight week as ETP volumes slid to $17B. Bitcoin led withdrawals while select altcoins saw inflows.

Digital Asset Funds Suffer Fifth Straight Week of Outflows as Volumes Fall to $17 Billion

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]
passport kinda charts 3

Digital asset funds had another rough week, with investors pulling US$288 million out of products, which is the fifth straight week of net redemptions. That streak has drained about US$4.0 billion in total since it began, a figure that’s still noticeably smaller than the roughly US$6 billion pulled over the same span last year. After a recent run of frenzied trading, activity cooled sharply: weekly trading volumes slid to about US$17 billion, the weakest showing since July 2025. In short, the market has gone from breathless to cautious.

What stands out most is how uneven the picture is across regions. American investors were the biggest sellers, accounting for roughly US$347 million of the outflows. Elsewhere, though, some buyers stepped in. Europe and Canada together netted about US$59 million in inflows, and a handful of countries actually drew decent demand: Switzerland saw about US$19.5 million come in, Canada pulled roughly US$16.8 million, and Germany added nearly US$16.2 million. So while the U.S. appears to be leaning toward the sidelines, other markets are treating the pullback as an opportunity to nibble.

Bitcoin is at the Heart of the Weakness

The king of crypto bore the brunt, with US$215 million leaving Bitcoin investment products. That said, not everyone is simply exiting; some are hedging. Short-Bitcoin products, which bet on a fall in Bitcoin’s price, attracted the largest inflows among single strategies, with about US$5.5 million pouring in. It’s a small number in the grand scheme, but it signals a shift in tactics: rather than outright panic selling, some traders are positioning for downside or trying to protect portfolios.

Ethereum wasn’t spared either, recording outflows of about US$36.5 million. Multi-asset products, which mix exposure across tokens, saw roughly US$32.5 million withdrawn, while Tron registered about US$18.9 million of redemptions. Those moves make it clear this was not just a bitcoin-only story; the pullback touched a broad swath of products.

Still, it isn’t all exits and gloom. A handful of altcoins enjoyed modest interest. XRP pulled in about US$3.5 million, Solana saw roughly US$3.3 million, and Chainlink attracted around US$1.2 million. These aren’t huge sums compared with the flows out of bitcoin and ether, but they show that some investors are being selective, hunting for specific opportunities even as broader risk appetite softens.

The fall in trading volumes to US$17 billion is especially telling. Not long ago, ETP turnover was hitting record levels; now, activity has contracted to its weakest point in nearly two years. That drop suggests investors are pausing, either to reassess in the face of macro uncertainty or to wait for clearer signals from prices and policy. When markets move from high volume to low volume, they become more susceptible to sharp swings, which, in turn, can make some investors even more cautious. It’s a self-reinforcing cycle.

So what does this mean going forward? For now, flows indicate a market in consolidation rather than collapse. U.S. investors’ restraint is the dominant theme, but pockets of conviction in Europe, Canada, and within certain altcoins show money hasn’t left the scene entirely. The small inflows into short-Bitcoin funds say a lot.

Traders aren’t panicking so much as hedging, bracing for bumps ahead. One new macro surprise, a shock economic print, regulatory news, or a big price swing, could flip sentiment overnight. Until then, expect jumpy markets, selective buying, and plenty of headline noise as managers decide whether to step back in or keep their distance.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Trump erupts at Fox News reporter during  roundtable: 'What a stupid question'

Trump erupts at Fox News reporter during  roundtable: 'What a stupid question'

An agitated President Donald Trump lashed out at two reporters during his White House “Saving College Sports” roundtable, complaining that the journalists failed
Share
Rawstory2026/03/07 07:19
Lyn Alden Tips Bitcoin Outperforming Gold Through to 2029

Lyn Alden Tips Bitcoin Outperforming Gold Through to 2029

The post Lyn Alden Tips Bitcoin Outperforming Gold Through to 2029 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin is likely to outperform gold on price performance
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/07 07:22