Today, Russia’s full-scale war of aggression against Ukraine is sadly entering its fifth year. The United Nations and its members have condemned Russia’s full-scaleToday, Russia’s full-scale war of aggression against Ukraine is sadly entering its fifth year. The United Nations and its members have condemned Russia’s full-scale

A just and lasting peace in Ukraine is in the interest of all of us

2026/02/24 00:04
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Today, Russia’s full-scale war of aggression against Ukraine is sadly entering its fifth year. The United Nations and its members have condemned Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, reinforcing the principles of international law and the UN Charter. Through resolutions in the General Assembly, an overwhelming majority of countries globally, including the Philippines, have denounced Russia’s actions, reaffirming Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders.

The consequences of this aggression are global and felt far beyond Europe, also in South East Asia. Economically, the war has disrupted food and energy supplies and contributed to higher inflation worldwide. It came on top of an already fragile global situation following the COVID-19 pandemic. Politically, the price is no lower. Russian aggression against Ukraine undermined the international order and eroded trust in international institutions. It has forced States to prioritize their security and has increased uncertainty within the international system. It turned attention and resources away from global public efforts such as cooperation on trade, development, and climate change. The sooner this war ends with a just and lasting peace, the sooner global attention and resources can be refocused. Predictability and stability in international relations are essential public goods, especially in a world facing multiple, overlapping crises.

The core principles enshrined in the UN Charter — sovereignty, territorial integrity, and the peaceful settlement of disputes — are universal commitments, not Western or European concepts. They are under strain in Ukraine and elsewhere, and respect for them is essential for the security of all states, large and small alike. How this war of aggression ends will further shape the future standing of these principles, already under immense tests elsewhere. If aggression is rewarded or normalized, sovereignty and territorial integrity risk becoming negotiable, weakening international stability far beyond Europe. If Russia can change borders by force, others will be tempted to try that, too.

A just and lasting peace in Ukraine is therefore critical to reaffirm the global value of these principles and to uphold the right of every sovereign nation to exist and make its own choices. Accountability for the suffering and destruction caused will also be essential, both for justice and to reinforce respect for international law.

2026 must be the year the aggression on Ukraine comes to an end. Russia has intensified its aggression lately, with indiscriminate attacks on critical infrastructure which causes tremendous suffering of civilian populations. However, Ukrainians continue to show incredible resilience while facing constant brutality. They certainly deserve peace.

The European Union will continue to support Ukraine for as long as necessary. The EU and its Member States are Ukraine’s leading supporters, providing extensive political, financial, and military assistance. A just and lasting peace in Ukraine can help restore predictability and international order in the modern world. This is why we urgently need it.

Signed by the Heads of Mission of the European Union, Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Greece, Spain, France, Croatia, Italy, Cyprus, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland, and Sweden.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Trump erupts at Fox News reporter during  roundtable: 'What a stupid question'

Trump erupts at Fox News reporter during  roundtable: 'What a stupid question'

An agitated President Donald Trump lashed out at two reporters during his White House “Saving College Sports” roundtable, complaining that the journalists failed
Share
Rawstory2026/03/07 07:19
Lyn Alden Tips Bitcoin Outperforming Gold Through to 2029

Lyn Alden Tips Bitcoin Outperforming Gold Through to 2029

The post Lyn Alden Tips Bitcoin Outperforming Gold Through to 2029 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin is likely to outperform gold on price performance
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/07 07:22