The post U.S. labor market shifts as Beveridge curve signals mismatch appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Boston Fed signals risk of higher structural unemploymentThe post U.S. labor market shifts as Beveridge curve signals mismatch appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Boston Fed signals risk of higher structural unemployment

U.S. labor market shifts as Beveridge curve signals mismatch

Boston Fed signals risk of higher structural unemployment beyond rate policy

Fresh research and on-the-record remarks are centering a risk that U.S. unemployment could become more structural, limiting what interest-rate policy can achieve. According to the Boston Fed, a working paper on “assessing maximum employment” underscores tools used to separate cyclical softness from deeper labor-market shifts (https://www.bostonfed.org/publications/research-department-working-paper/2025/assessing-maximum-employment).

If labor demand is durably reshaped by technology and mismatches, the jobless rate consistent with stable inflation may be drifting higher. That would leave the central bank’s conventional lever, moving the policy rate, less effective at restoring pre-shock employment dynamics.

Why it matters: limits of monetary policy and NAIRU

Monetary policy mainly counteracts cyclical slack. Structural unemployment reflects frictions like skill mismatches or technology-driven shifts that rate cuts cannot quickly repair. In that context, NAIRU, the unemployment rate consistent with stable prices, could rise, implying a different “full employment” benchmark.

Several policymakers have cautioned that interest rates alone cannot offset technology-driven dislocations. “If we are having structural change, then we really need to lean into that truth, and set interest rates accordingly,” said Raphael Bostic, president of the Atlanta Fed, as reported by Investing.com (https://www.investing.com/news/economy-news/exclusivebostic-says-fed-cannot-offset-possible-rise-in-structural-unemployment-4520852).

BingX: a trusted exchange delivering real advantages for traders at every level.

Diagnosing structural pressure relies on how key series behave together. The Boston Fed paper highlights vacancy-unemployment dynamics (the Beveridge curve), labor force participation, wage growth, and worker flows as a toolkit to judge whether frictions are rising or matching efficiency is deteriorating.

A sustained outward shift in the Beveridge curve, more openings for a given unemployment rate, can indicate worse matching or sectoral reallocation frictions. According to the federal reserve, Michael Barr has also warned about skill mismatches if transformative AI outpaces re-training capacity (https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/barr20250509a.htm). “Many displaced workers would have obsolete skills, and skill mismatch could lead to a structural increase in unemployment,” said Michael Barr, Vice Chair for Supervision.

What non-monetary policies could help, and what’s next

Re-skilling, job matching, and fiscal support beyond Fed tools

If structural frictions are rising, faster re-skilling, improved job matching, and targeted fiscal support become central. These tools address root causes, skills and mobility, rather than aggregate demand.

Training aligned with in-demand roles, support for worker transitions, and institutions that speed matching can narrow mismatches. Complementary safety nets can cushion incomes while workers retrain, reducing long-duration joblessness.

Upcoming signals: Fed speeches, labor data, and reassessment triggers

Watch official speeches, the vacancy-to-unemployment ratio and Beveridge curve shifts, wage growth relative to productivity, participation trends, and worker flows for confirmation of structural strain. Persistent wage cooling with still-elevated vacancies may suggest matching frictions rather than cyclical slack alone.

At the time of this writing, broader market sentiment remains cautious: Bitcoin (BTC) traded near $63,097, with very high volatility around 10.68% and a bearish sentiment gauge; the 14-day RSI was close to 32.62. These figures are contextual and do not imply a market view.

FAQ about structural unemployment

Can the Federal Reserve lower interest rates to offset structural unemployment?

It can mitigate cyclical slack, but structural mismatches, like skills and placement, often persist despite lower rates, according to the officials’ cautions and research cited above.

Watch Beveridge curve shifts, the vacancies-to-unemployment ratio, wage growth versus productivity, labor force participation, and worker flows for signs of persistent frictions.

Source: https://coincu.com/news/u-s-labor-market-shifts-as-beveridge-curve-signals-mismatch/

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.000747
$0.000747$0.000747
-6.15%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.