BitcoinWorld Bitcoin Bottom Signals a Strategic Buying Opportunity: Analyst Urges Incremental Investment On-chain data from leading analytics firm Glassnode indicatesBitcoinWorld Bitcoin Bottom Signals a Strategic Buying Opportunity: Analyst Urges Incremental Investment On-chain data from leading analytics firm Glassnode indicates

Bitcoin Bottom Signals a Strategic Buying Opportunity: Analyst Urges Incremental Investment

2026/02/24 22:30
6 min read

BitcoinWorld

Bitcoin Bottom Signals a Strategic Buying Opportunity: Analyst Urges Incremental Investment

On-chain data from leading analytics firm Glassnode indicates Bitcoin may have established a significant market bottom, presenting a calculated opportunity for long-term investors. According to a detailed analysis published this week, key metrics now mirror historical capitulation phases, suggesting the current price range represents a foundation for future cycles. This assessment comes amidst a complex macroeconomic landscape, prompting a closer examination of the data driving this conclusion.

Decoding the Bitcoin Bottom: On-Chain Evidence and Historical Parallels

Checkmate, the lead on-chain analyst at Glassnode, has presented a data-driven case for Bitcoin’s current positioning. He specifically points to mean reversion models across both technical and on-chain frameworks. These models suggest BTC’s price is trading within a defined bottoming range. Consequently, this pattern bears a striking resemblance to two previous major market cycles. The first parallel is the December 2018 bottom, which preceded the 2019-2021 bull run. The second is the June 2022 capitulation, which occurred months before the final low of $15,600 triggered by the FTX collapse in November 2022.

This analysis relies on verifiable blockchain data, not speculation. Metrics such as the MVRV Z-Score, which compares market value to realized value, and the Puell Multiple, which tracks miner revenue, have entered zones historically associated with long-term value accumulation. Furthermore, network activity and holder behavior patterns show similarities to past cycle lows. These indicators collectively form a mosaic of evidence that seasoned analysts use to gauge market structure.

The Strategy of Dollar-Cost Averaging Amidst Uncertainty

In response to these findings, Checkmate advocates for a disciplined investment strategy: dollar-cost averaging (DCA). This method involves purchasing a fixed dollar amount of an asset at regular intervals, regardless of its price. The core argument is that trying to time the absolute bottom is exceptionally difficult, even with robust data. Therefore, systematically accumulating assets during a statistically cheap range mitigates risk and removes emotional decision-making.

The analyst explicitly advises investors to ignore prevailing bearish sentiment. He acknowledges the potential for further price declines, a common feature of final bear market phases. However, historical precedent shows that the initial bottom often forms well before the final liquidity flush event. For instance, in 2022, the initial bottoming signals emerged in June, but the ultimate low came after the FTX failure in December. This six-month period of sideways consolidation and final shakeout tested investor patience but ultimately confirmed the cycle low.

Expert Context: The Psychology of Market Bottoms

Market bottoms are not defined by a single price point but by a period of investor exhaustion and structural reset. Glassnode’s research provides empirical backing for this concept. During these phases, long-term holders typically increase their accumulation, while short-term speculative activity diminishes. This transfer of assets from weak to strong hands is a critical on-chain signature of a sustainable bottom. Checkmate’s commentary aligns with this established framework, emphasizing patience over prediction.

The current analysis also considers broader macroeconomic factors influencing cryptocurrency markets. Rising interest rates, inflationary pressures, and regulatory developments create a challenging environment. However, on-chain data focuses on the internal health and behavior of the Bitcoin network itself, offering a counterpoint to purely macro-driven narratives. This multi-faceted approach enhances the authority and trustworthiness of the assessment.

Comparative Analysis: 2018, 2022, and the Present

Understanding the current moment requires examining past cycles. The following table outlines key similarities and contextual differences:

Cycle PhaseDecember 2018June – December 2022Current Analysis (2025)
Primary CatalystEnd of ICO boom, mining capitulationTerra/LUNA collapse, macro tighteningPost-ETF adoption, macro uncertainty
On-Chain SignalMVRV Z-Score below -0.5Puell Multiple deep in undervalued zoneMultiple mean reversion models aligning
Price Action Post-Signal~6 months of basing before rally~6 months of basing, final flush (FTX)Pattern suggests accumulation range
Investor SentimentExtreme fear, “crypto winter” narrativeExtreme fear, multiple bankruptciesPersistent bearishness, caution

This comparative view highlights a recurring theme: bottoms are processes, not events. They involve a convergence of negative sentiment, low prices, and constructive on-chain developments. The data suggests we are witnessing a similar convergence today.

Conclusion

Glassnode’s on-chain analysis presents a compelling, evidence-based argument that Bitcoin is trading within a historical bottoming range. While external volatility and price declines remain possible, the data indicates this period shares key characteristics with past cycle lows that preceded major rallies. The recommended strategy of dollar-cost averaging offers a prudent method for navigating this uncertainty, focusing on long-term accumulation over short-term timing. For investors, the current Bitcoin bottom analysis underscores the importance of data, discipline, and patience in cryptocurrency markets.

FAQs

Q1: What is a “mean reversion model” in on-chain analysis?
A mean reversion model is a statistical tool that identifies when an asset’s price or a metric has deviated significantly from its historical average and is likely to revert back to that mean. In Bitcoin’s context, analysts use these models to spot extreme overvaluation or undervaluation.

Q2: Why does the analyst recommend dollar-cost averaging instead of a lump-sum investment?
Dollar-cost averaging reduces the risk of investing a large sum at a temporarily high price. By spreading purchases over time during a bottoming range, an investor achieves an average entry price, which is often more effective than attempting to pinpoint the absolute lowest price.

Q3: What was the significance of the FTX collapse in the 2022 bottom?
The FTX collapse in November 2022 acted as a final “liquidity flush” or capitulation event. It forced the last major wave of distressed selling, creating the ultimate cycle low of $15,600. The initial bottoming signals, however, had appeared months earlier.

Q4: How reliable are historical parallels in predicting Bitcoin’s price?
While history does not repeat exactly, it often rhymes. Past cycles provide frameworks for understanding market psychology and structural phases. On-chain data offers objective evidence of similar investor behavior, but it is not a guaranteed predictor of future prices.

Q5: What other indicators should investors watch to confirm a market bottom?
Beyond the models cited, investors monitor exchange net flows (indicating accumulation or distribution), the percentage of supply in profit/loss, and long-term holder behavior. A sustained trend of coins moving off exchanges into cold storage is a particularly strong confirmatory signal.

This post Bitcoin Bottom Signals a Strategic Buying Opportunity: Analyst Urges Incremental Investment first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

Market Opportunity
Black Mirror Logo
Black Mirror Price(MIRROR)
$0.001297
$0.001297$0.001297
-0.99%
USD
Black Mirror (MIRROR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
MYX Finance price surges again as funding rate points to a crash

MYX Finance price surges again as funding rate points to a crash

MYX Finance price went parabolic again as the recent short-squeeze resumed. However, the formation of a double-top pattern and the funding rate point to an eventual crash in the coming days. MYX Finance (MYX) came in the spotlight earlier this…
Share
Crypto.news2025/09/18 02:57
Trump enlists GOP to translate his conspiracy theories into new action

Trump enlists GOP to translate his conspiracy theories into new action

President Donald Trump will deliver his "State of the Union" address on Tuesday and is expected to bring up some of his election conspiracies before calling on
Share
Alternet2026/02/25 04:52