The post Bitcoin Down 50% From $126K Peter Schiff Warns of $40K Crash appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News The debate around Bitcoin’s long-term outlook isThe post Bitcoin Down 50% From $126K Peter Schiff Warns of $40K Crash appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News The debate around Bitcoin’s long-term outlook is

Bitcoin Down 50% From $126K Peter Schiff Warns of $40K Crash

2026/02/25 18:26
3 min read
Peter Schiff Bitcoin crash warning

The post Bitcoin Down 50% From $126K Peter Schiff Warns of $40K Crash appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

The debate around Bitcoin’s long-term outlook is intensifying once again. While some investors view the recent pullback as a standard cycle correction, longtime critic Peter Schiff believes something far more structural is unfolding.

Bitcoin is currently trading roughly 50% below its October 2025 high of $126,000. After failing to regain sustained upside momentum, the asset has entered a period of consolidation under key resistance levels. Volatility tied to macroeconomic uncertainty and geopolitical stress has further pressured risk assets across the board.

But Schiff’s warning goes beyond charts and technical levels.

The “Bubble Market” Argument

Schiff describes Bitcoin as sentiment-driven and bubble-like, arguing that the multi-year rally was fueled by speculation rather than sustainable fundamentals. In his view, the recent downturn signals that “the air is coming out” of an overextended market.

He has suggested that Bitcoin could fall toward $50,000, or even $40,000, if downside momentum accelerates. Schiff also made headlines by claiming that a single Truth Social post from Donald Trump could significantly impact Bitcoin’s price, underscoring what he sees as the asset’s fragility and dependence on political sentiment.

Schiff has additionally criticized Trump’s pro-crypto stance, calling efforts to position the United States as a global crypto hub misguided and a misallocation of capital.

  • Also Read :
  •   Crypto Market Today: Bitcoin and Ethereum Pump After Jane Street Lawsuit
  •   ,

Gold’s Surge and Institutional Rotation

While Bitcoin struggles, Schiff points to gold’s strong performance as evidence of a broader monetary shift. He argues that rising gold prices reflect de-dollarization trends and renewed central bank accumulation of hard assets.

Institutional flows appear to support a divergence. Hedge fund exposure to Bitcoin ETFs has declined in recent quarters, while gold-backed funds now manage significantly larger total assets. During periods of market stress, capital has increasingly rotated into traditional safe havens.

Two Competing Narratives

Bitcoin supporters maintain that volatility is a normal part of long-term adoption cycles. They argue that network fundamentals and institutional infrastructure remain intact despite the correction.

For now, Bitcoin stands between two sharply contrasting views. One sees a fragile bubble vulnerable to sentiment shocks, even political ones. The other sees a maturing asset navigating another cyclical downturn.

Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!

Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.

bell icon Subscribe to News

FAQs

Is Bitcoin in a bubble right now?

Some critics call it a bubble due to speculation and volatility. Long-term investors argue it’s a cyclical correction, not a structural collapse.

Are institutions moving from Bitcoin to gold?

Some capital has rotated into gold during market stress. Bitcoin ETF flows have cooled, but long-term institutional interest remains.

Does political news really impact Bitcoin’s price?

Yes. Bitcoin often reacts to political headlines and regulation shifts, but long-term price trends are driven more by adoption and liquidity.

Market Opportunity
Farcana Logo
Farcana Price(FAR)
$0.001145
$0.001145$0.001145
-3.13%
USD
Farcana (FAR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.