Making a purchasing decision used to be a fairly drawn-out process. Open Google, scan various links, click through multiple sites, compare different options, checkMaking a purchasing decision used to be a fairly drawn-out process. Open Google, scan various links, click through multiple sites, compare different options, check

AI search has rewritten the buying journey and brands are behind

2026/02/26 14:44
5 min read

Making a purchasing decision used to be a fairly drawn-out process. Open Google, scan various links, click through multiple sites, compare different options, check reviews, and perhaps ask colleagues and friends. It wasn’t necessarily a smooth process, but rather a fragmented and often time-consuming one. Well, this model is now being dismantled and really rather quickly. 

Today, more and more buying journeys start and end inside an AI interface. Whether it’s ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, or another large language model (LLM), consumers are no longer sifting through ten different links. Instead, they receive personalised answers following a prompt.

The upshot of this is that the time between the question being posed and a buyer armed with the info to make a decision has practically evaporated. This is a seismic shift in what it means for a brand to be truly visible online.

From search engine to answer engine

Search engines have historically acted as directories. Yes, they present options, but really, users have to do a lot of the legwork themselves. AI search, by contrast, effectively acts as an interpreter. It ingests vast amounts of information and returns a distilled answer tailored to the user’s personal preferences. For example, instead of typing “best running shoes” into Google, users are now able to ask AI – “What’s the best cushioned running shoe for someone training for a half marathon with knee pain?”. 

This shift is massive as the AI effectively becomes the first and possibly the only filter in the buying journey. If your brand isn’t part of the summarised answer that the LLM delivers, it’s as if you don’t exist.

Curiosity has increased but friction has decreased

To be clear, traditional search certainly hasn’t disappeared. In fact, usage has continued to grow steadily. What has changed however is how people use and interact with it.

Consumers no longer make snap decisions after glancing at a few links for comparison. They are now asking more layered, nuanced questions. AI tools are facilitating deeper investigation without any extra effort, meaning buyers are becoming more curious as a result. Any friction in decision-making has been drastically reduced and gone are the days when multiple tabs, inconsistent information, and conflicting reviews meant a buying decision was excessively drawn out. AI has made the experience feel more authoritative and personalised.

It’s the personalisation that really is key here. Not only does AI search answer questions, but it also answers them specifically in context. It factors in historical preferences and defined constraints. Over time, these systems will increasingly anticipate needs as opposed to simply responding to them. The transition from reactive search to proactive recommendation is clear.

Why most brands are invisible

The uncomfortable reality is that many companies are simply not structured to appear in AI-driven answers. For years, SEO strategies were designed around ranking for broad keywords. But now, AI search favours specifics. It prioritises those who clearly articulate and explain the problem they’re solving and the target audiences they serve.

Generalist positioning is losing ground to specialist clarity, and this has presented smaller companies with an opportunity. Large businesses describing themselves in ambiguous language are essentially being downgraded by AI that rewards precise wording.

The brands successful in AI search follow a few key principles rigidly. First, they clearly define both who they are for and who they are not for. Second, they structure their content in ways that LLMs can easily process. Third, they maintain consistent messaging across owned and earned channels. And fourth, they build authority through credible third-party mentions.

AI systems don’t just quickly scan a website. They focus on pinpointing trust signals in your online presence. If you are not referenced in credible publications or industry conversations, this drastically reduces your chances of being included in LLM-generated recommendations.

Share of voice becomes share of recommendation

Whereas traditional search has historically been about ranking, AI search is all about inclusion. Instead of tracking keyword positions, the brands that are truly thinking ahead are tracking “AI visibility” – i.e. how often they are mentioned in relevant AI-generated conversations.

Early case studies are striking. Companies that were previously invisible in AI search environments have seen referral growth surge after optimising their positioning and authority signals. In some cases, the impact of this process has meant AI-driven referrals have increased by multiples, directly impacting revenue growth.

In a way, the mechanism is arguably quite simple. When AI systems recommend you, high-intent traffic follows. In turn, because this recommendation often appears framed as a direct answer, rather than a paid advertisement, the trust dynamic is different. It makes the interface feel neutral, objective, and impartial. That perception alone can accelerate conversion.

What happens next?

We are still in the very early stages of this shift. Phase one is what we’re experiencing now – i.e. consumers using AI tools to research and refine purchasing decisions faster. Phase two is automation. As AI systems accumulate more contextual knowledge about individual users, they will transition from merely answering questions to proactively initiating suggestions. From here, transactions will increasingly happen inside AI interfaces themselves.

AI search has not only shortened the buying journey, but it has also redefined it. Page one of Google is no longer the one and only battleground. Brands that accept the importance of this shift, adapt their positioning, content, and build credibility, will find themselves recommended. Those that don’t may still exist online, but they just won’t be seen.

Market Opportunity
Checkmate Logo
Checkmate Price(CHECK)
$0.059728
$0.059728$0.059728
+0.12%
USD
Checkmate (CHECK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Bitwise CEO: In the next 6 to 12 months, the focus of the crypto field will be on the credit and lending market

Bitwise CEO: In the next 6 to 12 months, the focus of the crypto field will be on the credit and lending market

PANews reported on September 18 that Bitwise CEO Hunter Horsley tweeted that over the next six to 12 months, the focus of the cryptocurrency sector will shift to credit and lending. This sector is expected to experience explosive growth in the next few years. He pointed out that the current cryptocurrency market capitalization is approaching $4 trillion and continues to grow. When people can borrow against cryptocurrency, they will choose to borrow rather than sell. Furthermore, the market capitalization of publicly traded stocks in the United States exceeds $60 trillion. With the tokenization of assets, individuals holding $7,000 worth of stocks will be able to borrow against them on-chain for the first time. Horsley believes that cryptocurrency is redefining capital markets, and this is just the beginning.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 17:00
Nvidia (NVDA) Stock Rises After Q4 Earnings and Guidance Beat – Data Center Revenue Up 75%

Nvidia (NVDA) Stock Rises After Q4 Earnings and Guidance Beat – Data Center Revenue Up 75%

TLDR Nvidia beat Q4 earnings estimates with EPS of $1.62 adjusted vs $1.53 expected Total revenue hit $68.13 billion, up 73% year-over-year Data center revenue
Share
Coincentral2026/02/26 17:12
Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Turn lengthy earnings call transcripts into one-page insights using the Financial Modeling Prep APIPhoto by Bich Tran Earnings calls are packed with insights. They tell you how a company performed, what management expects in the future, and what analysts are worried about. The challenge is that these transcripts often stretch across dozens of pages, making it tough to separate the key takeaways from the noise. With the right tools, you don’t need to spend hours reading every line. By combining the Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) API with Groq’s lightning-fast LLMs, you can transform any earnings call into a concise summary in seconds. The FMP API provides reliable access to complete transcripts, while Groq handles the heavy lifting of distilling them into clear, actionable highlights. In this article, we’ll build a Python workflow that brings these two together. You’ll see how to fetch transcripts for any stock, prepare the text, and instantly generate a one-page summary. Whether you’re tracking Apple, NVIDIA, or your favorite growth stock, the process works the same — fast, accurate, and ready whenever you are. Fetching Earnings Transcripts with FMP API The first step is to pull the raw transcript data. FMP makes this simple with dedicated endpoints for earnings calls. If you want the latest transcripts across the market, you can use the stable endpoint /stable/earning-call-transcript-latest. For a specific stock, the v3 endpoint lets you request transcripts by symbol, quarter, and year using the pattern: https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={q}&year={y}&apikey=YOUR_API_KEY here’s how you can fetch NVIDIA’s transcript for a given quarter: import requestsAPI_KEY = "your_api_key"symbol = "NVDA"quarter = 2year = 2024url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={API_KEY}"response = requests.get(url)data = response.json()# Inspect the keysprint(data.keys())# Access transcript contentif "content" in data[0]: transcript_text = data[0]["content"] print(transcript_text[:500]) # preview first 500 characters The response typically includes details like the company symbol, quarter, year, and the full transcript text. If you aren’t sure which quarter to query, the “latest transcripts” endpoint is the quickest way to always stay up to date. Cleaning and Preparing Transcript Data Raw transcripts from the API often include long paragraphs, speaker tags, and formatting artifacts. Before sending them to an LLM, it helps to organize the text into a cleaner structure. Most transcripts follow a pattern: prepared remarks from executives first, followed by a Q&A session with analysts. Separating these sections gives better control when prompting the model. In Python, you can parse the transcript and strip out unnecessary characters. A simple way is to split by markers such as “Operator” or “Question-and-Answer.” Once separated, you can create two blocks — Prepared Remarks and Q&A — that will later be summarized independently. This ensures the model handles each section within context and avoids missing important details. Here’s a small example of how you might start preparing the data: import re# Example: using the transcript_text we fetched earliertext = transcript_text# Remove extra spaces and line breaksclean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip()# Split sections (this is a heuristic; real-world transcripts vary slightly)if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1)else: prepared, qna = clean_text, ""print("Prepared Remarks Preview:\n", prepared[:500])print("\nQ&A Preview:\n", qna[:500]) With the transcript cleaned and divided, you’re ready to feed it into Groq’s LLM. Chunking may be necessary if the text is very long. A good approach is to break it into segments of a few thousand tokens, summarize each part, and then merge the summaries in a final pass. Summarizing with Groq LLM Now that the transcript is clean and split into Prepared Remarks and Q&A, we’ll use Groq to generate a crisp one-pager. The idea is simple: summarize each section separately (for focus and accuracy), then synthesize a final brief. Prompt design (concise and factual) Use a short, repeatable template that pushes for neutral, investor-ready language: You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call sectionfor {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise.Return:1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets)2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened)3) Forward outlook (specific statements)4) Risks / watch-outs5) Q&A takeaways (if present)Text:<<<{section_text}>>> Python: calling Groq and getting a clean summary Groq provides an OpenAI-compatible API. Set your GROQ_API_KEY and pick a fast, high-quality model (e.g., a Llama-3.1 70B variant). We’ll write a helper to summarize any text block, then run it for both sections and merge. import osimport textwrapimport requestsGROQ_API_KEY = os.environ.get("GROQ_API_KEY") or "your_groq_api_key"GROQ_BASE_URL = "https://api.groq.com/openai/v1" # OpenAI-compatibleMODEL = "llama-3.1-70b" # choose your preferred Groq modeldef call_groq(prompt, temperature=0.2, max_tokens=1200): url = f"{GROQ_BASE_URL}/chat/completions" headers = { "Authorization": f"Bearer {GROQ_API_KEY}", "Content-Type": "application/json", } payload = { "model": MODEL, "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": "You are a precise, neutral equity research analyst."}, {"role": "user", "content": prompt}, ], "temperature": temperature, "max_tokens": max_tokens, } r = requests.post(url, headers=headers, json=payload, timeout=60) r.raise_for_status() return r.json()["choices"][0]["message"]["content"].strip()def build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year): template = """ You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call section for {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise. Return: 1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets) 2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened) 3) Forward outlook (specific statements) 4) Risks / watch-outs 5) Q&A takeaways (if present) Text: <<< {section_text} >>> """ return textwrap.dedent(template).format( symbol=symbol, quarter=quarter, year=year, section_text=section_text )def summarize_section(section_text, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024"): if not section_text or section_text.strip() == "": return "(No content found for this section.)" prompt = build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year) return call_groq(prompt)# Example usage with the cleaned splits from Section 3prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")final_one_pager = f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks — Key Points{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()print(final_one_pager[:1200]) # preview Tips that keep quality high: Keep temperature low (≈0.2) for factual tone. If a section is extremely long, chunk at ~5–8k tokens, summarize each chunk with the same prompt, then ask the model to merge chunk summaries into one section summary before producing the final one-pager. If you also fetched headline numbers (EPS/revenue, guidance) earlier, prepend them to the prompt as brief context to help the model anchor on the right outcomes. Building the End-to-End Pipeline At this point, we have all the building blocks: the FMP API to fetch transcripts, a cleaning step to structure the data, and Groq LLM to generate concise summaries. The final step is to connect everything into a single workflow that can take any ticker and return a one-page earnings call summary. The flow looks like this: Input a stock ticker (for example, NVDA). Use FMP to fetch the latest transcript. Clean and split the text into Prepared Remarks and Q&A. Send each section to Groq for summarization. Merge the outputs into a neatly formatted earnings one-pager. Here’s how it comes together in Python: def summarize_earnings_call(symbol, quarter, year, api_key, groq_key): # Step 1: Fetch transcript from FMP url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={api_key}" resp = requests.get(url) resp.raise_for_status() data = resp.json() if not data or "content" not in data[0]: return f"No transcript found for {symbol} {quarter} {year}" text = data[0]["content"] # Step 2: Clean and split clean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip() if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1) else: prepared, qna = clean_text, "" # Step 3: Summarize with Groq prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol, quarter, year) qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol, quarter, year) # Step 4: Merge into final one-pager return f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()# Example runprint(summarize_earnings_call("NVDA", 2, 2024, API_KEY, GROQ_API_KEY)) With this setup, generating a summary becomes as simple as calling one function with a ticker and date. You can run it inside a notebook, integrate it into a research workflow, or even schedule it to trigger after each new earnings release. Free Stock Market API and Financial Statements API... Conclusion Earnings calls no longer need to feel overwhelming. With the Financial Modeling Prep API, you can instantly access any company’s transcript, and with Groq LLM, you can turn that raw text into a sharp, actionable summary in seconds. This pipeline saves hours of reading and ensures you never miss the key results, guidance, or risks hidden in lengthy remarks. Whether you track tech giants like NVIDIA or smaller growth stocks, the process is the same — fast, reliable, and powered by the flexibility of FMP’s data. Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40