World Liberty Financial (WLFI) has introduced a sweeping governance reform proposal that would require token holders to stake their assets in order to participateWorld Liberty Financial (WLFI) has introduced a sweeping governance reform proposal that would require token holders to stake their assets in order to participate

Trump Related WLFI Proposes Mandatory Staking for Governance in Major Overhaul

2026/02/26 17:11
3 min read

World Liberty Financial (WLFI) has introduced a sweeping governance reform proposal that would require token holders to stake their assets in order to participate in voting.

The proposed WLFI Governance Staking System is designed to shift the ecosystem away from short-term speculation and toward long-term alignment by linking influence and rewards to token lock-up duration.

If approved, the proposal would fundamentally reshape how governance power is distributed within the WLFI ecosystem.

Mandatory Staking for Voting Rights

Under the proposal, holders of unlocked WLFI tokens would be required to stake their tokens for a minimum of 180 days in order to vote on governance matters. Voting power would not be calculated solely based on the number of tokens staked. Instead, it would use a square root formula that factors in both the amount of tokens locked and the remaining duration of the lock-up.

Source: https://governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com/t/proposal-wlfi-governance-staking-system/52645

This structure is intended to reduce the influence of short-term large holders while rewarding sustained commitment to the ecosystem.

Staking Rewards for Active Participation

Participants who stake their tokens and vote at least twice during their lock period would be eligible for a base reward of approximately 2% APR. These rewards would be funded directly from the WLFI treasury.

By tying rewards to active governance participation, the system aims to incentivize engagement rather than passive holding.

Tiered Participation Roles

The proposal also introduces two high-level participation tiers designed for large stakeholders.

The Node Tier would require a minimum stake of 10 million WLFI, estimated at approximately $1 million. In return, participants would gain access to 1:1 over-the-counter (OTC) conversion pathways for stablecoins such as USDT and USDC into USD1, along with additional rewards tied to conversion volume.

The Super Node Tier would require a minimum stake of 50 million WLFI, roughly $5 million. This tier would provide priority access to the WLFI team for partnership discussions and potential economic incentives, signaling a closer relationship between major stakeholders and the protocol’s strategic direction.

Bitcoin’s Four-Year Cycle Still Intact? On-Chain and Price Align Again

Strategic Objective Behind the Proposal

According to the proposal, one of the core objectives is to redirect arbitrage value back into the ecosystem. During the expansion of the USD1 stablecoin, institutional market makers reportedly captured a significant portion of arbitrage opportunities. The new staking system aims to ensure that long-term WLFI participants benefit more directly from ecosystem growth rather than external actors.

Voting Timeline and Implementation Plan

The proposal is currently open for a seven-day community vote. In order to pass, it requires a minimum quorum of 1 billion eligible voting tokens.

If approved, implementation would roll out in three phases, beginning with the activation of governance staking for all holders of unlocked WLFI tokens.

If adopted, the WLFI Governance Staking System would mark a major shift toward long-term capital commitment, structured influence, and deeper ecosystem alignment.

The post Trump Related WLFI Proposes Mandatory Staking for Governance in Major Overhaul appeared first on ETHNews.

Market Opportunity
WLFI Logo
WLFI Price(WLFI)
$0.1153
$0.1153$0.1153
-1.36%
USD
WLFI (WLFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.