Key Takeaways Q4 revenue and earnings missed expectations as Bitcoin’s drop hit mining income hard. Mining revenue fell sharply quarter […] The post TeraWulf MissesKey Takeaways Q4 revenue and earnings missed expectations as Bitcoin’s drop hit mining income hard. Mining revenue fell sharply quarter […] The post TeraWulf Misses

TeraWulf Misses Estimates as Bitcoin Slump Weighs on Q4 Results

2026/02/28 02:42
3 min read

Key Takeaways

  • Q4 revenue and earnings missed expectations as Bitcoin’s drop hit mining income hard.
  • Mining revenue fell sharply quarter over quarter, driving a wider net loss.
  • Full-year revenue still grew 20%, despite a large GAAP loss driven mostly by non-cash items.
  • AI/HPC leasing revenue increased and remains the core growth focus.
  • Analysts stayed bullish, betting on the AI transition over short-term mining weakness.

The results, released February 26, capped a year of dramatic contrasts for the Easton, Maryland-based miner — strong annual growth on one hand, a deteriorating quarterly picture on the other.

A Rough Quarter by Any Measure

For the three months ended December 31, 2025, TeraWulf reported revenue of $35.8 million, well short of the $44.1 million analysts had penciled in. The loss per share came in at $1.66 — a stark departure from the $0.16 loss the market had anticipated.

The culprit was hard to miss. Bitcoin, which had traded near $125,000 in early October, had lost more than half its value by February 2026, hovering around $60,000. That collapse hit digital asset mining revenue hard, which fell to $26.1 million in Q4 from $43.4 million the prior quarter.

The full-year GAAP net loss widened to $661.4 million, though the bulk of that figure — some $429.8 million — stemmed from non-cash fair value adjustments on warrants and higher depreciation charges rather than operating losses alone.

Annual revenue, for its part, told a different story: $168.5 million for 2025, up 20% from the year prior.

Betting on AI

TeraWulf has been vocal about its ambitions beyond Bitcoin, and the Q4 report gave management another platform to press that case. High-performance computing lease revenue — the segment tied to AI infrastructure — rose to $9.7 million in Q4, up from $7.2 million the previous quarter, offering a rare bright spot in an otherwise difficult print.

The company says it secured $12.8 billion in long-term AI and HPC lease contracts during 2025, a figure that has become central to its investor pitch. To support that buildout, TeraWulf completed $6.5 billion in debt and equity-linked financing last year and is pursuing new site acquisitions in Kentucky and Maryland that would, if completed, double its total capacity to 2.8 gigawatts.

READ MORE:

Here Is What Could Trigger a 2026 Crypto Rebound, According to JPMorgan

The company ended the year with $3.7 billion in total cash and restricted cash — a sizable buffer as it heads into what promises to be a capital-intensive period.

Wall Street Shrugs Off the Miss

Shares slipped roughly 1.5% to 3.8% in early trading following the report, a muted reaction given the size of the earnings shortfall. Over the past twelve months, WULF has gained more than 300%, a run largely credited to investor enthusiasm around its AI transition.

Several analysts held their ground. Rosenblatt raised its price target to $23.00 per share following the results, while Compass Point maintained a buy-equivalent rating with a $28.00 target. Both firms pointed to the HPC business as the reason to look past the mining weakness.

Whether that confidence holds will depend in large part on how quickly TeraWulf can shift its revenue mix — and whether Bitcoin cooperates along the way.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

The post TeraWulf Misses Estimates as Bitcoin Slump Weighs on Q4 Results appeared first on Coindoo.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
MYX Finance price surges again as funding rate points to a crash

MYX Finance price surges again as funding rate points to a crash

MYX Finance price went parabolic again as the recent short-squeeze resumed. However, the formation of a double-top pattern and the funding rate point to an eventual crash in the coming days. MYX Finance (MYX) came in the spotlight earlier this…
Share
Crypto.news2025/09/18 02:57
US Pentagon chief orders Anthropic retaliation designation and lays out the ban

US Pentagon chief orders Anthropic retaliation designation and lays out the ban

Anthropic is now tagged as a Supply-Chain Risk to National Security by the Department of War, according to U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who posted a long
Share
Cryptopolitan2026/02/28 13:20