The post Will the Credit Cards With its Fees Survive Stablecoins? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. According to financial journalist Paul J. Davies, stablecoins pose a bigger threat to U.S. credit cards than to bank accounts or money market funds. What are the real dynamics between credit cards and stablecoins, and what are the possible outcomes of their collision? Summary The U.S. credit card networks and banks collect inflated swipe fees costing American families over $1,000 annually.  Regulators’ attempts to cap swipe fees have been failing. Paul J. Davies expressed his opinion that stablecoins are a threat to costly credit card networks. Inflated swipe fees On Sep. 2, 2025, Bloomberg released an op-ed by Paul J. Davies. In the article, he claims that stablecoins pose a threat to U.S. credit cards. Davies suggests that people don’t speak about this threat enough and focus more on other sectors disrupted by stablecoins. According to him, in traditional finance, stablecoins pose “the most coherent threat” to the credit card sector. As stablecoins allow for fast and cheap transactions,  Americans soon might tend to prefer them to using credit cards. Given that lately, swipe fees in the U.S. have been growing consistently, reaching 4% in 2023, merchants may opt for the use of stablecoins and encourage users to choose cryptocurrency instead of cards. Davies believes it is rather a specifically American problem, as in Europe, swipe fees are much lower than in the U.S. "Senator Richard Durbin has been trying for years to pass legislation that would force the credit card industry to slash swipe fees — just as he successfully did with debit cards more than a decade ago, and Europe and the UK have done for all card payments." 👀 https://t.co/YYWPnEwboK — Dimitri Dadiomov (@dadiomov) September 2, 2025 The Federal Reserve stepped in, pushing for “swipe fee” regulation that would have put a cap on the fees applied… The post Will the Credit Cards With its Fees Survive Stablecoins? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. According to financial journalist Paul J. Davies, stablecoins pose a bigger threat to U.S. credit cards than to bank accounts or money market funds. What are the real dynamics between credit cards and stablecoins, and what are the possible outcomes of their collision? Summary The U.S. credit card networks and banks collect inflated swipe fees costing American families over $1,000 annually.  Regulators’ attempts to cap swipe fees have been failing. Paul J. Davies expressed his opinion that stablecoins are a threat to costly credit card networks. Inflated swipe fees On Sep. 2, 2025, Bloomberg released an op-ed by Paul J. Davies. In the article, he claims that stablecoins pose a threat to U.S. credit cards. Davies suggests that people don’t speak about this threat enough and focus more on other sectors disrupted by stablecoins. According to him, in traditional finance, stablecoins pose “the most coherent threat” to the credit card sector. As stablecoins allow for fast and cheap transactions,  Americans soon might tend to prefer them to using credit cards. Given that lately, swipe fees in the U.S. have been growing consistently, reaching 4% in 2023, merchants may opt for the use of stablecoins and encourage users to choose cryptocurrency instead of cards. Davies believes it is rather a specifically American problem, as in Europe, swipe fees are much lower than in the U.S. "Senator Richard Durbin has been trying for years to pass legislation that would force the credit card industry to slash swipe fees — just as he successfully did with debit cards more than a decade ago, and Europe and the UK have done for all card payments." 👀 https://t.co/YYWPnEwboK — Dimitri Dadiomov (@dadiomov) September 2, 2025 The Federal Reserve stepped in, pushing for “swipe fee” regulation that would have put a cap on the fees applied…

Will the Credit Cards With its Fees Survive Stablecoins?

According to financial journalist Paul J. Davies, stablecoins pose a bigger threat to U.S. credit cards than to bank accounts or money market funds. What are the real dynamics between credit cards and stablecoins, and what are the possible outcomes of their collision?

Summary

  • The U.S. credit card networks and banks collect inflated swipe fees costing American families over $1,000 annually. 
  • Regulators’ attempts to cap swipe fees have been failing.
  • Paul J. Davies expressed his opinion that stablecoins are a threat to costly credit card networks.

Inflated swipe fees

On Sep. 2, 2025, Bloomberg released an op-ed by Paul J. Davies. In the article, he claims that stablecoins pose a threat to U.S. credit cards. Davies suggests that people don’t speak about this threat enough and focus more on other sectors disrupted by stablecoins. According to him, in traditional finance, stablecoins pose “the most coherent threat” to the credit card sector.

As stablecoins allow for fast and cheap transactions,  Americans soon might tend to prefer them to using credit cards. Given that lately, swipe fees in the U.S. have been growing consistently, reaching 4% in 2023, merchants may opt for the use of stablecoins and encourage users to choose cryptocurrency instead of cards. Davies believes it is rather a specifically American problem, as in Europe, swipe fees are much lower than in the U.S.

The Federal Reserve stepped in, pushing for “swipe fee” regulation that would have put a cap on the fees applied by the U.S. banks to merchants. On Aug. 7, a U.S. judge vacated the initiative. The defense line of banks is coming down to the need to cover debit card issuance expenses. 

The combined amount of fees paid in 2024 amounted to $187.2 billion, which is a 10% increase from 2023 and 70% increase from the pandemic era. Another source names a lower evaluation, claiming credit card companies in the U.S. made $148.5 billion from transaction fees, adding that swipe fees cost American families $1,200 annually. Depending on the operator, some transactions imply fees exceeding 3%.

Earlier this year, MPC Executive Committee member Christine Pollack was commenting on the swipe fees situation. She noted that American families and small businesses face economic uncertainty as Wall Street banks and credit card networks keep on inflating the fee burden. She claimed that price-fixed swipe fees keep on rising as there is “no competition to keep them in check.” According to Davies, the competition is here, and it is a stablecoin sector that is going to make the U.S. credit card industry, with its bloated swipe fees, obsolete.

However, we don’t see credit card companies fighting stablecoins or crypto per se. Rather, big TradFi entities like Visa and Mastercard are exploring avenues to embed themselves into the cryptocurrency market. Soon, they may become a handy gateway into the cryptocurrency realm.  

Rivalry between the U.S. credit cards and stablecoins

While the integration of the credit card system and stablecoin sector in the U.S. seems inevitable, it doesn’t mean stablecoins are not a threat to credit cards. 

While high swipe fees are arguably the main drawback of bank cards when compared to stablecoins, there are multiple other factors making stablecoins more attractive:

  • Settlement speed: Stablecoin transactions are faster. More than that, cross-border transactions are as time-efficient as inland transactions, whereas bank transactions may take up to several days.  
  • Geographic coverage: Stablecoins are almost universal. All they require is an internet connection. Transactions involving banks are limited to jurisdictions where these banks can operate. This made the African unbanked population one of the drivers of the crypto revolution. 
  • Hidden and middleman costs: The use of credit or debit cards may incur additional fees charged for currency conversion and other services.
  • Fraud and chargebacks: While crypto transactions are irreversible, TradFi has room for chargebacks and fraud that uses this tool.   

Davies cites American Express CEO Stephen Squeri as saying that credit cards have enough benefits to compete with stablecoins. Squeri named reward programs, dispute resolution, protection against fraud, and ease of use. Who knows if all of these are enough to outweigh the high costs?

We asked Denelle Dixon about the dynamics in the relationships between stablecoins and credit card issuers. Dixon is the CEO and executive director of Stellar Development Foundation, connecting institutional finance and blockchain technology. According to Dixon, there’s more potential than threat in stablecoins. She said:

Dixon sees support for stablecoins from payment card giants as the way to maintain relevance during the new opportunity for payments. She suggests that when Visa or Mastercard integrates stablecoins, they unlock benefits associated with stablecoins, namely “faster settlement, borderless utility and new customer segments, while still leveraging their existing global reach.” She adds: 

Both stablecoins and the credit card industry can benefit from working side by side. Stablecoins have a technological edge but lack the client loyalty and reputation of TradFi. At this stage, it doesn’t seem that they can seriously harm the credit card business; in fact, they complement each other.

Source: https://crypto.news/will-the-u-s-credit-card-industry-survive-stablecoins/

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.010085
$0.010085$0.010085
+2.65%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Sui Mainnet Recovers After 6-Hour Network Stall: No Funds at Risk

Sui Mainnet Recovers After 6-Hour Network Stall: No Funds at Risk

On January 14, 2026, Sui Mainnet faced a significant disruption, leaving the network stalled for roughly six hours. The incident was caused by an internal divergence
Share
Tronweekly2026/01/17 09:30
Will There Be A ’28 Years Later 3’ After ‘The Bone Temple’? Here’s The Good News

Will There Be A ’28 Years Later 3’ After ‘The Bone Temple’? Here’s The Good News

The post Will There Be A ’28 Years Later 3’ After ‘The Bone Temple’? Here’s The Good News appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Chi Lewis-Parry and Ralph Fiennes
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/17 09:21
Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill

Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill

BitcoinWorld Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with significant developments as Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong recently took to Washington, D.C., advocating passionately for a clearer regulatory path. His mission? To champion the passage of a vital crypto market structure bill, specifically the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act. This legislative push is not just about policy; it’s about safeguarding investor rights and fostering innovation in the digital asset space. Why a Clear Crypto Market Structure Bill is Essential Brian Armstrong’s visit underscores a growing sentiment within the crypto industry: the urgent need for regulatory clarity. Without clear guidelines, the market operates in a gray area, leaving both innovators and investors vulnerable. The proposed crypto market structure bill aims to bring much-needed definition to this dynamic sector. Armstrong explicitly stated on X that this legislation is crucial to prevent a recurrence of actions that infringe on investor rights, citing past issues with former U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler. This proactive approach seeks to establish a stable and predictable environment for digital assets. Understanding the CLARITY Act: A Blueprint for Digital Assets The Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act is designed to establish a robust regulatory framework for the cryptocurrency industry. It seeks to delineate the responsibilities of key regulatory bodies, primarily the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Here are some key provisions: Clear Jurisdiction: The bill aims to specify which digital assets fall under the purview of the SEC as securities and which are considered commodities under the CFTC. Investor Protection: By defining these roles, the act intends to provide clearer rules for market participants, thereby enhancing investor protection. Exemption Conditions: A significant aspect of the bill would exempt certain cryptocurrencies from the stringent registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, provided they meet specific criteria. This could reduce regulatory burdens for legitimate projects. This comprehensive approach promises to bring structure to a rapidly evolving market. The Urgency Behind the Crypto Market Structure Bill The call for a dedicated crypto market structure bill is not new, but Armstrong’s direct engagement highlights the increasing pressure for legislative action. The lack of a clear framework has led to regulatory uncertainty, stifling innovation and sometimes leading to enforcement actions that many in the industry view as arbitrary. Passing this legislation would: Foster Innovation: Provide a clear roadmap for developers and entrepreneurs, encouraging new projects and technologies. Boost Investor Confidence: Offer greater certainty and protection for individuals investing in digital assets. Prevent Future Conflicts: Reduce the likelihood of disputes between regulatory bodies and crypto firms, creating a more harmonious ecosystem. The industry believes that a well-defined regulatory landscape is essential for the long-term health and growth of the digital economy. What a Passed Crypto Market Structure Bill Could Mean for You If the CLARITY Act or a similar crypto market structure bill passes, its impact could be profound for everyone involved in the crypto space. For investors, it could mean a more secure and transparent market. For businesses, it offers a predictable environment to build and scale. Conversely, continued regulatory ambiguity could: Stifle Growth: Drive innovation overseas and deter new entrants. Increase Risks: Leave investors exposed to unregulated practices. Create Uncertainty: Lead to ongoing legal battles and market instability. The stakes are incredibly high, making the advocacy efforts of leaders like Brian Armstrong all the more critical. The push for a clear crypto market structure bill is a pivotal moment for the digital asset industry. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong’s efforts in Washington, D.C., reflect a widespread desire for regulatory clarity that protects investors, fosters innovation, and ensures the long-term viability of cryptocurrencies. The CLARITY Act offers a potential blueprint for this future, aiming to define jurisdictional boundaries and streamline regulatory requirements. Its passage could unlock significant growth and stability, cementing the U.S. as a leader in the global digital economy. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What is the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act? The CLARITY Act is a proposed crypto market structure bill aimed at establishing a clear regulatory framework for digital assets in the U.S. It seeks to define the roles of the SEC and CFTC and exempt certain cryptocurrencies from securities registration requirements under specific conditions. Why is Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong advocating for this bill? Brian Armstrong is advocating for the CLARITY Act to bring regulatory certainty to the crypto industry, protect investor rights from unclear enforcement actions, and foster innovation within the digital asset space. He believes it’s crucial for the industry’s sustainable growth. How would this bill impact crypto investors? For crypto investors, the passage of this crypto market structure bill would mean greater clarity on which assets are regulated by whom, potentially leading to enhanced consumer protections, reduced market uncertainty, and a more stable investment environment. What are the primary roles of the SEC and CFTC concerning this bill? The bill aims to delineate the responsibilities of the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) regarding digital assets. It seeks to clarify which assets fall under securities regulation and which are considered commodities, reducing jurisdictional ambiguity. What could happen if a crypto market structure bill like CLARITY Act does not pass? If a clear crypto market structure bill does not pass, the industry may continue to face regulatory uncertainty, potentially leading to stifled innovation, increased legal challenges for crypto companies, and a less secure environment for investors due to inconsistent enforcement and unclear rules. Did you find this article insightful? Share it with your network to help spread awareness about the crucial discussions shaping the future of digital assets! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping crypto regulation and institutional adoption. This post Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 20:35