PANews reported on March 4th that, according to The Block, TD Cowen analysis suggests that banks may ultimately lose the battle over stablecoin yields because opposingPANews reported on March 4th that, according to The Block, TD Cowen analysis suggests that banks may ultimately lose the battle over stablecoin yields because opposing

TD Cowen: Banks may lose the battle over stablecoin yields, but the stalemate could jeopardize crypto legislation.

2026/03/04 08:48
1 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

PANews reported on March 4th that, according to The Block, TD Cowen analysis suggests that banks may ultimately lose the battle over stablecoin yields because opposing consumer gains is politically unsustainable. However, if this dispute drags on too long, it could jeopardize the passage of the US crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act.

Last week, the OCC released a proposal for the implementation of the GENIUS Act, including a statutory injunction prohibiting issuers from directly paying stablecoin yields and establishing a "rebuttable presumption": if an issuer coordinates with an affiliate to have the latter pay yields to holders, such third-party yield arrangements may be illegal. TD Cowen believes that unless platforms are explicitly prohibited from paying yields, the OCC's approach is unlikely to satisfy banks. The OCC may change its stance after receiving public comments, or issuers and platforms may adjust their contractual structures to circumvent regulations, or platforms could even successfully challenge the rule in court. With the repeal of the Scheffren principle, the OCC's interpretation of the GENIUS Act no longer enjoys judicial respect, and Congress has not explicitly prohibited platforms from paying interest or issuers from paying marketing fees to platforms.

Market Opportunity
The AI Prophecy Logo
The AI Prophecy Price(ACT)
$0.01394
$0.01394$0.01394
+3.10%
USD
The AI Prophecy (ACT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.