Though the senators were named in documents related to Duterte’s crimes against humanity case, reports about the supposed issuance of arrest warrants against themThough the senators were named in documents related to Duterte’s crimes against humanity case, reports about the supposed issuance of arrest warrants against them

FACT CHECK: No confirmation yet on ICC arrest warrants for Dela Rosa, Go

2026/03/04 13:08
5 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Claim: Arrest warrants from the International Criminal Court (ICC) have been publicly issued for senators Christopher “Bong” Go and Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa, who have been named as co-perpetrators in former president Rodrigo Duterte’s crimes against humanity case.

Rating: FALSE

Why we fact-checked this: A Facebook post from March 2 has been spreading the claim, garnering over 1,600 reactions, 115 shares, and 749 comments as of writing. Other accounts on Facebook and YouTube have made related claims, with similar levels of engagement.
The attached graphic in the post features an image of Dela Rosa and Go with text that says: “Bato Dela Rosa at Bong Go buking himas rehas!” (Bato Dela Rosa and Bong Go caught, handcuffed!)
The post’s caption also claims that an arrest warrant has been issued for the senators: “Kagimbal-gimbal! Buking na ang lahat dahil sa biglang paglabas ng ICC warrant of arrest na magpapakulong kina Bato Dela Rosa at Bong Go ngayon.

(Shocking! Everyone is in shock because of the sudden issuance of the ICC arrest warrant that will now imprison Bato Dela Rosa and Bong Go.)

The facts: Although there are reports of possible arrest warrants to be issued against the two senators, there is no official announcement from the ICC confirming that arrest warrants have already been issued or will be issued against Dela Rosa or Go.

While the ICC prosecution named Dela Rosa and Go as among Duterte’s co-perpetrators, warrants for their arrest have not been confirmed, according to various Philippine officials. 

On February 18, Senate President Tito Sotto stated that the chamber has not received an official notice from the ICC, adding, “Senator Bong Go has not received anything. Senator Dela Rosa has not received anything. So there’s nothing to talk about.”

Palace press officer Undersecretary Claire Castro stated on February 16 that the Philippine government has not yet officially received any arrest warrant against Duterte’s alleged co-perpetrators.

Meanwhile, Nicholas Kaufman, Duterte’s lead defense lawyer, said in a statement on February 14 that “none of these co-perpetrators are, in my opinion, currently subject to arrest warrants.”

Earlier in November 2025, Ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulla said that an ICC warrant has been issued for Dela Rosa, although Malacañang, the Department of Justice, and the Department of the Interior and Local Government said this supposed warrant has not been confirmed.

The ICC also said it cannot confirm the alleged issuance of a warrant, with ICC spokesperson Fadi El Abdallah saying that developments concerning ICC-related matters are released solely through the court’s official communication platforms.

Co-perpetrators: On February 13, the ICC released a lesser redacted version of the Document Containing the Charges in Duterte’s case. It publicly identified Go, Dela Rosa, and six others as alleged indirect co-perpetrators in Duterte’s alleged crimes, describing their involvement in a common plan to “neutralize” alleged criminals, including those linked to illegal drugs. 

Former ICC judge Raul Pangalangan told ANC in an interview that it was “possible” that warrants have been requested or issued against Duterte’s co-perpetrators under seal. 

In an interview with Rappler, ICC Deputy Prosecutor Mame Mandiaye Niang, without confirming whether they have requested an arrest warrant for Dela Rosa, said that any such request for any case should remain a secret to protect witnesses or ensure the efficiency of enforcement.

Case status: Duterte, who faces crimes against humanity charges over his administration’s brutal drug war, is now awaiting a decision from ICC judges on whether his case will proceed to a full trial.

Following the conclusion of his confirmation of charges hearing, in which the prosecution and defense presented their merits of the case, the judges are now set to deliberate on whether there is sufficient evidence to confirm the charges against Duterte.

Debunked: Rappler has previously debunked other false claims about the ICC, which surged in number since the February confirmation of charges hearings:

  • FACT CHECK: Duterte not set to be released in February 2026, ICC case ongoing
  • FACT CHECK: ICC judges did not walk out during Joel Butuyan’s opening statement
  • FACT CHECK: Photo of Duterte with a gun, shown at ICC, taken out of context in viral video
  • FACT CHECK: Duterte ICC case still ongoing, not dismissed
  • FACT CHECK: ICC ruling on Duterte waiver misrepresented as decision on his release 

 – Alyanna Marie Cruz, Justine Schzean De Jesus, Monica Gleza De Vera, Princess Allysa Dumduma, Jo Hannah Estrada, Earl Gregorio Gigantone, Raymund Romeo Guzman/Rappler.com

This fact check was written by a group of students under the Social Media Dynamics class of Mr. Patrick Ernest Celso from the University of Santo Tomas. It was reviewed by a member of Rappler’s research team and a senior editor.

Keep us aware of suspicious Facebook pages, groups, accounts, websites, articles, or photos in your network by contacting us at [email protected]. Let us battle disinformation one Fact Check at a time.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

De Britse financiële waakhond, de FCA, komt in 2026 met nieuwe regels speciaal voor crypto bedrijven. Wat direct opvalt: de toezichthouder laat enkele klassieke financiële verplichtingen los om beter aan te sluiten op de snelle en grillige wereld van digitale activa. Tegelijkertijd wordt er extra nadruk gelegd op digitale beveiliging,... Het bericht FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt verscheen het eerst op Blockchain Stories.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:33
PBOC Sets Strongest Fix In 34 Months, Signaling Strategic Shift

PBOC Sets Strongest Fix In 34 Months, Signaling Strategic Shift

The post PBOC Sets Strongest Fix In 34 Months, Signaling Strategic Shift appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Yuan Mid-Point Soars: PBOC Sets Strongest Fix In 34
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/05 11:45
Fintech Is Leveling the Playing Field in Trading, Says Zak Westphal

Fintech Is Leveling the Playing Field in Trading, Says Zak Westphal

The post Fintech Is Leveling the Playing Field in Trading, Says Zak Westphal appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The trading world was once divided into two groups: those with access to high-powered data and those without.  As you might have guessed, it was the major institutions (like Wall Street) that had a monopoly on the tools, data access, and speed. This left retail traders fighting to keep up. This gap is closing rapidly, and the main reason is the introduction of new technology and platforms entering the fold. Zak Westphal has been at the forefront of this transformation. While Co-Founding StocksToTrade, he has been a big part of empowering everyday traders to gain access to the real-time information and algorithmic systems that have long provided Wall Street with its edge. We spoke with him about how fintech is reshaping the landscape and what it really means for retail traders today. Fintech has changed everything from banking to payments. In your opinion, what has been its greatest impact on the world of trading? For me, it’s all about access. When I began my trading career, institutions had a significant advantage, even more pronounced than it is now. They had direct feeds of data, algorithmic systems, and research teams monitoring information right around the clock. Retail traders, on the other hand, had slower information and pretty basic tools in comparison.  Fintech has substantially changed the game. Today, a retail trader from home can access real-time market data, scan thousands of stocks in mere seconds, and utilize algorithmic tools that were once only available to hedge funds. I can’t think of a time when the access for everyday traders has been as accessible as it is today. That doesn’t mean the advantages are gone, because Wall Street still has resources that individuals simply can’t have. However, there is now an opportunity for everyday traders actually to compete. And that is a…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 17:14