The post Safe-haven bid versus consumer tax – BNY appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BNY’s Bob Savage highlights that Oil supply shock risks look underpriced The post Safe-haven bid versus consumer tax – BNY appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BNY’s Bob Savage highlights that Oil supply shock risks look underpriced

Safe-haven bid versus consumer tax – BNY

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

BNY’s Bob Savage highlights that Oil supply shock risks look underpriced even as prediction markets see high odds of crude reaching $100/bbl. He notes strong investor flows into Energy equities across regions and describes Oil as a new safe haven. However, he warns that sustained high crude prices could act as a consumer tax and pressure growth equities.

Safe-haven flows and demand risks

“The risk of an oil supply shock appears underpriced even as prediction markets assign 50% to 80% odds of oil reaching $100/bbl.”

“The rush to own oil has been notable, making it one of the clearest new safe havens.”

“Investors’ ability to look through the current crisis and see value in energy will depend on the balance between inflation and demand destruction.”

“Energy is viewed as a win-win investment, given the supply shock and the structural uptick in capex linking materials and industrials, particularly defense and data centers.”

“If crude sustains levels closer to $100/bbl, as it did at the start of the Ukraine-Russia war, inflation expectations may firm, reinforcing higher-for-longer rate dynamics and pressuring duration-sensitive growth equities, particularly given that 44% of the S&P 500 is tied to tech, AI and credit-linked themes.”

(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor.)

Source: https://www.fxstreet.com/news/oil-safe-haven-bid-versus-consumer-tax-bny-202603060921

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.