US Federal Judge Halts Transfers of 70.6 BTC Amid BlockFills Asset Dispute

TLDR

• US judge freezes 70.6 BTC tied to BlockFills amid Dominion Capital dispute

• BlockFills faces legal pressure after court freezes disputed 70.6 BTC

• Court blocks 70.6 BTC transfer as BlockFills battles asset lawsuit

• 70.6 BTC frozen by US court as BlockFills faces losses and scrutiny

• Legal fight over 70.6 BTC intensifies pressure on crypto firm BlockFills

A US federal judge has frozen 70.6 BTC linked to crypto firm BlockFills during an escalating asset dispute. The order blocks transfers of the 70.6 BTC while a lawsuit from Dominion Capital moves forward in court. The decision adds pressure on BlockFills after losses, suspended withdrawals, and leadership changes.

Court Order Freezes 70.6 BTC in BlockFills Dispute

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil issued a temporary restraining order targeting 70.6 BTC currently controlled by BlockFills. The ruling prevents the company from moving the 70.6 BTC or shifting the assets outside the United States. The court also required strict separation of customer funds and a detailed accounting of Dominion Capital holdings.

Dominion Capital filed the complaint on February 27 in the Southern District of New York. The firm argues BlockFills retained customer crypto assets and used commingled balances to offset internal trading losses. Consequently, the judge approved the freeze on 70.6 BTC to prevent potential asset dissipation.

The temporary order remains active until a scheduled court review later this month. BlockFills must present records explaining the location and status of the 70.6 BTC holdings. The company must also respond formally before March 17 unless the court extends the restrictions.

BlockFills Faces Liquidity Strain After Market Decline

BlockFills halted customer withdrawals on February 11 after severe market volatility strained liquidity. The platform cited Bitcoin’s drop toward $60,000 as a major factor behind operational stress. However, the withdrawal freeze intensified scrutiny of the firm’s management and financial controls.

Internal estimates placed company losses near $75 million during the market downturn. Meanwhile, institutional clients questioned whether assets remained fully backed on the trading platform. The dispute over 70.6 BTC emerged during this period of financial instability.

Leadership changes followed as co-founder Nicholas Hammer stepped down from the chief executive role. Joseph Perry assumed interim leadership while the company attempted to stabilize operations. Restructuring specialists also warned that BlockFills could face bankruptcy without rapid financial recovery.

Legal Dispute Raises Broader Industry Concerns

Dominion Capital seeks to recover the 70.6 BTC it claims the trading firm wrongfully retained. The restraining order ensures the 70.6 BTC remains untouched until the court evaluates ownership claims. This legal protection preserves the disputed cryptocurrency while litigation proceeds.

BlockFills served roughly 2,000 institutional clients including hedge funds and asset managers. The firm reported more than $60 billion in trading volume during 2025. Yet operational disruptions have raised broader questions about asset custody and transparency.

The court case highlights ongoing risks within centralized crypto lending and trading services. Legal actions involving large digital asset holdings continue to shape oversight discussions. The fate of the frozen 70.6 BTC will depend on upcoming court hearings and financial disclosures.

The post US Federal Judge Halts Transfers of 70.6 BTC Amid BlockFills Asset Dispute appeared first on CoinCentral.