Solana is down 57% since its spot ETFs launched in July 2025. Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas called it arguably some of the worst timing any ETF launch couldSolana is down 57% since its spot ETFs launched in July 2025. Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas called it arguably some of the worst timing any ETF launch could

Solana ETFs Lost 57% Since Launch and Still Pulled In $1.45 Billion

2026/03/06 19:16
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Solana is down 57% since its spot ETFs launched in July 2025. Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas called it arguably some of the worst timing any ETF launch could have.

The funds attracted $1.45 billion in cumulative inflows anyway, and most of that capital has not left.

What the Numbers Actually Show

The Bloomberg Intelligence chart tells the story cleanly. Cumulative Solana ETF flows started near zero in July 2025, grew slowly through September, accelerated sharply through October and November, and reached $410 million by October 23. From there the growth steepened dramatically, hitting $1.45 billion by March 2, 2026. The line barely dips anywhere on the chart. Capital came in and stayed.

That stickiness matters as much as the total. ETF flows that reverse quickly on price weakness signal speculative retail money chasing momentum. Flows that hold through a 57% price decline signal something different. Balchunas notes that approximately 50% of assets come from 13F filers, meaning institutional investors with reporting obligations account for roughly half the money in these products. Institutions filing 13Fs do not typically chase short-term price momentum. They allocate, hold, and rebalance on longer timeframes.

The Market Cap Adjustment That Changes the Story

Balchunas made a second point that cuts through the raw number comparison between Solana and Bitcoin ETFs. If you adjust Solana’s $1.45 billion in flows for its smaller market cap relative to Bitcoin, the demand is roughly equivalent to $54 billion in Bitcoin ETF flows at the same stage of launch.

Bitcoin ETFs had attracted approximately half that amount at the equivalent point in their cycle. And Bitcoin was rallying during its ETF launch period, not down 57%. Solana ETFs generated proportionally double the demand of Bitcoin ETFs at the same stage, into a falling market.

That comparison reframes the narrative entirely. Judged in isolation, $1.45 billion into a product whose underlying asset has halved in value looks like a rough start. Adjusted for market cap and compared against the benchmark ETF launch in crypto history, it looks like unusually strong institutional conviction in a difficult environment.

Solana Is Now the Biggest Stablecoin Network by Volume

What It Does Not Guarantee

None of this predicts where Solana’s price goes from $88. Institutional inflows into an ETF and price appreciation are related but not the same thing. The $1.45 billion in cumulative flows represents capital already allocated. Future price performance depends on whether new capital continues entering, whether existing holders add to positions, and whether the broader altcoin rotation that the Altcoin Season Index at 14 suggests has not yet arrived finally materializes.

What the data rules out is the conclusion that Solana ETFs have failed or that institutional interest is weak. By the most relevant comparable measure available, the opposite appears to be true.

The post Solana ETFs Lost 57% Since Launch and Still Pulled In $1.45 Billion appeared first on ETHNews.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies

U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies

The post U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The United States is contending with the intricacies of cryptocurrency regulation as newly enacted legislation stirs debate over centralized versus decentralized finance. The recent passage of the GENIUS Act under Bo Hines’ leadership is perceived to skew favor towards centralized entities, potentially disadvantaging decentralized innovations. Continue Reading:U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies Source: https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/u-s-moves-grip-on-crypto-regulation-intensifies
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:09
Rising stablecoins, bullish jobs data, and how crypto is moving past hedge flows

Rising stablecoins, bullish jobs data, and how crypto is moving past hedge flows

The post Rising stablecoins, bullish jobs data, and how crypto is moving past hedge flows appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The macro setup is gradually tilting
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/07 02:16
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37