Ongoing innovation in decentralized finance is again under scrutiny as the curve pancake dispute over code reuse and cybersecurity risks surfaces between two majorOngoing innovation in decentralized finance is again under scrutiny as the curve pancake dispute over code reuse and cybersecurity risks surfaces between two major

Cybersecurity and licensing concerns intensify amid curve pancake dispute over StableSwap code

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]
curve pancake dispute

Ongoing innovation in decentralized finance is again under scrutiny as the curve pancake dispute over code reuse and cybersecurity risks surfaces between two major DEX platforms.

Curve Finance challenges PancakeSwap over StableSwap implementation

The Curve Finance team publicly accused PancakeSwap of copying its StableSwap code without going through the proper Curve Finance licensing process needed for collaboration. According to Curve, the contested code powers the StableSwap feature used to swap stablecoins and other “tightly-pegged” assets on PancakeSwap Infinity, the latest version of the PancakeSwap DEX.

However, Curve indicated that it remains open to a formal agreement. “If you want to enjoy using stableswap without legal problems and to borrow some of our expertise to keep users SAFU, you still can contact us for licensing and collaboration,” the team wrote on X. That statement underscored both legal exposure and user-protection concerns.

In a separate post, Curve stressed that “deep stableswap expertise” is required to safely integrate swap features. Moreover, the team cited the 2022 hack of the Saddle Finance DEX and the $116 million hack of DeFi protocol Balancer in 2025 as examples of swap-based code exploits when such expertise is lacking.

The PancakeSwap team responded that it would reach out to Curve Finance to address the issue directly. That said, Curve replied, “Indeed, better to be friends and build together,” signaling a willingness to resolve the conflict collaboratively despite the ongoing curve pancake dispute over code usage and implementation.

Cointelegraph contacted both teams for additional comment but had not received any replies by the time of publication. The lack of response leaves open questions about how quickly the two projects will formalize any licensing or technical review process.

The incident highlights growing cybersecurity and legal risks that arise in decentralized finance as protocols iterate on products and expand features. However, it also illustrates how public communication on social platforms now plays a central role in negotiating open-source licensing and security responsibilities.

PancakeSwap Infinity launch, cross-chain strategy and new features

PancakeSwap Infinity officially launched on the Arbitrum network and BNB Chain in April 2025. The rollout followed the integration of one-click cross chain swaps designed to let users move digital assets seamlessly between supported blockchain protocols, improving capital efficiency across networks.

The upgraded DEX also introduced “hooks,” a system of DEX smart contract plugins that enables developers and liquidity providers to customize parameters for liquidity pools. Moreover, these hooks support dynamic fee structuring, tailored rebates, and onchain limit orders that only execute when predefined conditions are met, offering more granular control over trading strategies.

According to PancakeSwap, the Infinity upgrade cut pool creation fees by up to 99%, significantly lowering the barrier to launching new liquidity pools. That said, the design was also built to support a range of liquidity approaches, from passive strategies to more actively managed positions that can adapt to changing market conditions.

In July 2025, PancakeSwap Infinity expanded further by launching on Base, an Ethereum layer-2 (L2) scaling network. The team promoted trading fees up to 50% cheaper when ETH ($1,980)—the native token of the Ethereum layer-1 blockchain—was traded against ERC-20 tokens via the platform and its new routing architecture.

The ERC-20 token standard underpins most assets minted on Ethereum, including the gas and governance tokens of Ethereum L2 networks, memecoins, and other projects issuing tokens on the chain. However, as more assets and protocols interconnect, swap feature vulnerabilities become more consequential, especially when complex routing spans several smart contracts and networks.

Overall, the dispute between Curve Finance and PancakeSwap places fresh attention on licensing, security best practices, and collaborative engineering in DeFi. As cross-chain trading and advanced liquidity tools proliferate, legal clarity and robust code review will likely become as important as new product features themselves.

Market Opportunity
Major Logo
Major Price(MAJOR)
$0.06113
$0.06113$0.06113
+0.32%
USD
Major (MAJOR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13
Why More Startups Are Automating Their HR Processes in 2025

Why More Startups Are Automating Their HR Processes in 2025

  Startups in 2025 are moving faster than ever. With lean teams, remote workforces, and aggressive growth goals, manual HR management no longer fits the modern
Share
Techbullion2026/03/08 15:29
Shiba Inu Records -131 Billion in 24 Hours: Negative Netflow Signals Growing Demand

Shiba Inu Records -131 Billion in 24 Hours: Negative Netflow Signals Growing Demand

The post Shiba Inu Records -131 Billion in 24 Hours: Negative Netflow Signals Growing Demand appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SHIB exchange flow is hinting
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/08 15:30