The post Trying To Reach Live Customer Support appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Automated menus shouldn’t make customers want to scream. getty Have you ever called a customer support number and got “caught” in their automated menu system, so you repeatedly screamed “Agent” or “Representative” into the phone before eventually, out of frustration, you simply hung up? We surveyed more than 1,000 U.S. consumers and asked that question. Seventy-six percent of them answered, “Yes.” As companies, we invest a significant amount of money into marketing to attract customers so they become interested and purchase the products we sell. However, when we try to retain them, some of our efforts, which we think are acceptable, can make it difficult for them to obtain help, have their questions answered and have complaints resolved. There’s no reason it should be so difficult. In fact, the easier it is to connect and resolve issues, the greater the customer’s confidence in the company, often surpassing the level it would have been if the problem had never occurred. This is known as the Customer Service Recovery Paradox. There is a success metric I share with my clients called Time to Happiness. The best way to describe this is how long it takes an unhappy customer to become happy again. Many companies don’t realize that customers often don’t call the moment they have a problem. Their problem could start long before they pick up the phone to call and get help. And when the customer finally decides to reach out for help, what’s the experience like trying to connect with a live customer support agent? Is it easy? Or do complicated IVRs (Interactive Voice Response) and automated systems make it difficult to reach a person who can help? Or worse, does the system fail, making it appear impossible to get help? Keep in mind, the customer is already frustrated or… The post Trying To Reach Live Customer Support appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Automated menus shouldn’t make customers want to scream. getty Have you ever called a customer support number and got “caught” in their automated menu system, so you repeatedly screamed “Agent” or “Representative” into the phone before eventually, out of frustration, you simply hung up? We surveyed more than 1,000 U.S. consumers and asked that question. Seventy-six percent of them answered, “Yes.” As companies, we invest a significant amount of money into marketing to attract customers so they become interested and purchase the products we sell. However, when we try to retain them, some of our efforts, which we think are acceptable, can make it difficult for them to obtain help, have their questions answered and have complaints resolved. There’s no reason it should be so difficult. In fact, the easier it is to connect and resolve issues, the greater the customer’s confidence in the company, often surpassing the level it would have been if the problem had never occurred. This is known as the Customer Service Recovery Paradox. There is a success metric I share with my clients called Time to Happiness. The best way to describe this is how long it takes an unhappy customer to become happy again. Many companies don’t realize that customers often don’t call the moment they have a problem. Their problem could start long before they pick up the phone to call and get help. And when the customer finally decides to reach out for help, what’s the experience like trying to connect with a live customer support agent? Is it easy? Or do complicated IVRs (Interactive Voice Response) and automated systems make it difficult to reach a person who can help? Or worse, does the system fail, making it appear impossible to get help? Keep in mind, the customer is already frustrated or…

Trying To Reach Live Customer Support

Automated menus shouldn’t make customers want to scream.

getty

Have you ever called a customer support number and got “caught” in their automated menu system, so you repeatedly screamed “Agent” or “Representative” into the phone before eventually, out of frustration, you simply hung up?

We surveyed more than 1,000 U.S. consumers and asked that question. Seventy-six percent of them answered, “Yes.”

As companies, we invest a significant amount of money into marketing to attract customers so they become interested and purchase the products we sell. However, when we try to retain them, some of our efforts, which we think are acceptable, can make it difficult for them to obtain help, have their questions answered and have complaints resolved. There’s no reason it should be so difficult. In fact, the easier it is to connect and resolve issues, the greater the customer’s confidence in the company, often surpassing the level it would have been if the problem had never occurred. This is known as the Customer Service Recovery Paradox.

There is a success metric I share with my clients called Time to Happiness. The best way to describe this is how long it takes an unhappy customer to become happy again. Many companies don’t realize that customers often don’t call the moment they have a problem. Their problem could start long before they pick up the phone to call and get help.

And when the customer finally decides to reach out for help, what’s the experience like trying to connect with a live customer support agent? Is it easy? Or do complicated IVRs (Interactive Voice Response) and automated systems make it difficult to reach a person who can help? Or worse, does the system fail, making it appear impossible to get help?

Keep in mind, the customer is already frustrated or angry. Anything less than easy access to someone who can help is adding fuel to the fire.

The Stakes Are Higher Than You Think

Recently, I interviewed Mark Rohan, co-founder and COO of Klearcom, on Amazing Business Radio. While we can’t control the time it takes leading up to the point at which a customer reaches out to our company or brand, we must create a good experience from that point forward. Rohan said, “Customer experience doesn’t start once customers talk to an agent. It starts the moment a customer makes any engagement with the business.” That first interaction, whether it’s navigating an automated phone menu or trying to find the right department, sets the tone for everything that follows.

The numbers back this up. Rohan stated that around 73% of people will avoid a business if they have a bad encounter while trying to get to the right person to help them.

Don’t Let Self-Service Customer Support Become Your Customer Prevention Department

The irony is that CX technologies designed to improve the customer experience, such as IVR systems, chatbots and automated routing, can actually do more harm than good when they are poorly designed and implemented, creating frustration.

Rohan emphasizes that it takes balance. “No matter how good AI and digital options become, there will always be moments when people want to talk to another person.” The challenge isn’t choosing between technology and human support. It’s creating a seamless transition between them.

When a customer is frustrated, hearing “Press 1 for billing, press two for technical support …” for the third time isn’t just annoying. It’s potentially chasing away your customers.

Final Words

The solution isn’t to eliminate automation systems or any other type of technology driving a self-service solution. It’s to design and implement them thoughtfully. The best companies create clear, intuitive pathways to live support when customers need it. They recognize that while AI and digital options may deliver the quickest response for routine issues, urgent or sensitive matters require a human touch. Furthermore, some customers are not interested in self-service at all. They always want to talk to a human.

Rohan said, “Everyone remembers the poor experiences, but very few people remember the good ones.” That’s because people expect good experiences. So, make it easy to have that experience. The quality of your support isn’t just measured by how well you solve problems. It’s measured by how easy you make it for your customers to reach you when they have a problem to solve.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/shephyken/2025/09/07/mission-impossible-trying-to-reach-live-customer-support/

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.010138
$0.010138$0.010138
-0.17%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Ripple (XRP) Pushes Upwards While One New Crypto Explodes in Popularity

Ripple (XRP) Pushes Upwards While One New Crypto Explodes in Popularity

The post Ripple (XRP) Pushes Upwards While One New Crypto Explodes in Popularity appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. As Ripple (XRP) is slowly recovering through
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/18 02:41
Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets

The post Polygon Tops RWA Rankings With $1.1B in Tokenized Assets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Notes A new report from Dune and RWA.xyz highlights Polygon’s role in the growing RWA sector. Polygon PoS currently holds $1.13 billion in RWA Total Value Locked (TVL) across 269 assets. The network holds a 62% market share of tokenized global bonds, driven by European money market funds. The Polygon POL $0.25 24h volatility: 1.4% Market cap: $2.64 B Vol. 24h: $106.17 M network is securing a significant position in the rapidly growing tokenization space, now holding over $1.13 billion in total value locked (TVL) from Real World Assets (RWAs). This development comes as the network continues to evolve, recently deploying its major “Rio” upgrade on the Amoy testnet to enhance future scaling capabilities. This information comes from a new joint report on the state of the RWA market published on Sept. 17 by blockchain analytics firm Dune and data platform RWA.xyz. The focus on RWAs is intensifying across the industry, coinciding with events like the ongoing Real-World Asset Summit in New York. Sandeep Nailwal, CEO of the Polygon Foundation, highlighted the findings via a post on X, noting that the TVL is spread across 269 assets and 2,900 holders on the Polygon PoS chain. The Dune and https://t.co/W6WSFlHoQF report on RWA is out and it shows that RWA is happening on Polygon. Here are a few highlights: – Leading in Global Bonds: Polygon holds 62% share of tokenized global bonds (driven by Spiko’s euro MMF and Cashlink euro issues) – Spiko U.S.… — Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) (@sandeepnailwal) September 17, 2025 Key Trends From the 2025 RWA Report The joint publication, titled “RWA REPORT 2025,” offers a comprehensive look into the tokenized asset landscape, which it states has grown 224% since the start of 2024. The report identifies several key trends driving this expansion. According to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:40
XRPL Validator Reveals Why He Just Vetoed New Amendment

XRPL Validator Reveals Why He Just Vetoed New Amendment

Vet has explained that he has decided to veto the Token Escrow amendment to prevent breaking things
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:28