Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth became evasive during an interview with CBS that aired Sunday when asked about the deadly strike on an Iranian elementary school Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth became evasive during an interview with CBS that aired Sunday when asked about the deadly strike on an Iranian elementary school

Pete Hegseth clams up when asked about deadly strike on Iranian elementary school

2026/03/09 08:42
2 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth became evasive during an interview with CBS that aired Sunday when asked about the deadly strike on an Iranian elementary school last week that killed at least 168 children and 14 teachers, a strike that several analyses suggest was carried out by the Trump administration.

The strike, which was was carried out earlier this month, coincided with the Trump administration’s unprecedented attack on Iran, with Reuters, CNN and The New York Times all reporting that the strike was likely carried out by U.S. forces.

When asked about the strike and whether it came from the United States, Hegseth pivoted to attacking Iranian leadership.

“Well, we’re still investigating, and that’s where I’ll leave it today,” Hegseth said. “But what I will emphasize to you and to the world, is that unlike our adversaries – the Iranians – we never target civilians.”

Hegseth was asked again about the strikes, and this time with references to reports that suggested the strike was carried out by the United States.

“I’ve already said, we’re investigating,” Hegseth said.

Again, Hegseth was pressed on the matter, only this time asked if he would tell the American people if he could definitively say the strike was not carried out by the United States.

“I would… I’d… would say it’s being investigated, which is the only answer I’m prepared to give,” Hegseth said.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

‘Bitcoin Is Going to Die’ – The Latest Death Warning Comes from Oscar-Nominated Actor

‘Bitcoin Is Going to Die’ – The Latest Death Warning Comes from Oscar-Nominated Actor

Terrence Howard said he is not touching BTC as it's going to die.
Share
CryptoPotato2026/03/09 15:15
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Win Big at Shark Secret Casino for Real Cash!

Win Big at Shark Secret Casino for Real Cash!

Cryptsy - Latest Cryptocurrency News and Predictions Cryptsy - Latest Cryptocurrency News and Predictions - Experts in Crypto Casinos Did you know the online gambling
Share
Cryptsy2026/03/09 15:28