Nemo Protocol, a DeFi yield platform built on the Sui blockchain, has been hit by an exploit that drained millions in stablecoins.  PeckShieldAlert first flagged the breach on September 8, posting on X that roughly $2.4 million in USDC had…Nemo Protocol, a DeFi yield platform built on the Sui blockchain, has been hit by an exploit that drained millions in stablecoins.  PeckShieldAlert first flagged the breach on September 8, posting on X that roughly $2.4 million in USDC had…

Sui-based Nemo Protocol exploited for $2.4m

2025/09/08 20:24
3 min read

Nemo Protocol, a DeFi yield platform built on the Sui blockchain, has been hit by an exploit that drained millions in stablecoins. 

Summary
  • Nemo Protocol was exploited for $2.4 million, resulting in its TVL plunging from over $6 million to about $1.5 million.
  • Cetus Protocol on Sui was similarly hacked in May, with $162M frozen on-chain and $60M bridged out, marking another major exploit on the network this year.
  • DeFi hacks have surged in 2025, with $2.37 billion lost in the first half of the year.

PeckShieldAlert first flagged the breach on September 8, posting on X that roughly $2.4 million in USDC had been stolen from Nemo. The attacker quickly bridged the stolen funds from Arbitrum to Ethereum, according to the blockchain security firm’s analysis. 

Nemo confirmed the attack in a tweet shortly after, adding that an investigation is underway to determine the cause of the breach. The protocol also suspended all smart contract activity in the meantime.

The fallout was immediate. Data from DeFiLlama shows that Nemo’s total value locked (TVL) plunged to about $1.53 million, down sharply from more than $6 million before the attack. The exploit targeted the protocol’s yield-trading system, which allows users to split staked assets into Principal Tokens (PTs) and Yield Tokens (YTs) in order to speculate on future returns.

Questions have arisen around the exact cause of the breach, and the scale of the losses has already rattled the protocol’s community.

The attack gives fresh urgency to broader concerns around security on Sui, coming just months after another major protocol, Cetus, was similarly compromised.

Nemo hack marks second major exploit on Sui in 2025

Just months before the Nemo hack, another major incident rocked the Sui blockchain. On May 22, Cetus Protocol, a leading decentralized exchange and liquidity provider, was exploited for $223 million. The attacker exploited an arithmetic overflow vulnerability in a third-party math library, draining funds in under 15 minutes.

Sui validators and ecosystem partners quickly froze about $162 million of the stolen assets on-chain, and $60 million was bridged out to Ethereum. Cetus suspended its smart contracts and initiated a recovery plan that included a $6 million bounty, as well as talks of a “whitehat settlement” offering the attacker amnesty if remaining funds were returned.

These high-profile breaches are part of a broader surge in DeFi-targeted attacks throughout 2025. According to SlowMist’s mid-year report, the blockchain industry suffered over $2.37 billion in losses from 121 security incidents in the first half of the year, with DeFi accounting for 76% of those incidents, though centralized exchanges suffered larger dollar losses overall.

A separate analysis from Hacken’s 2025 mid-year security report puts total crypto industry losses at over $3.1 billion in the first six months. Access control failures like misconfigured wallets and legacy keys accounted for 59% of those losses, while DeFi-specific smart-contract vulnerabilities like the Cetus bug made up $263 million, or about 8%.

Hackers continue to zero in on DeFi protocols across multiple chains, and the Sui ecosystem is no exception. With two major exploits already this year in Cetus and Nemo, it remains to be seen whether new security measures can keep pace with the rising sophistication of attacks.

Market Opportunity
SUI Logo
SUI Price(SUI)
$0.911
$0.911$0.911
+6.20%
USD
SUI (SUI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Top 5 Cryptocurrencies for Long-Term Investment in 2026: Expert Analysis

Top 5 Cryptocurrencies for Long-Term Investment in 2026: Expert Analysis

Discover the top 5 cryptocurrencies for long-term investment in 2026. Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Chainlink, and Avalanche lead with institutional backing. The post
Share
Blockonomi2026/03/01 19:48
Tindig Pilipinas backs clergy’s complaint to fast-track Sara Duterte impeachment

Tindig Pilipinas backs clergy’s complaint to fast-track Sara Duterte impeachment

'Consolidating our support behind the third complaint will strengthen our position and help move the case forward to the Senate impeachment court,' Tindig Pilipinas
Share
Rappler2026/03/01 19:47