The post How To Overcome Predictive AI’s Everyday Failure appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Stakeholder skepticism about machine learning often rings true: If the data scientist hasn’t measured the potential value, then how could the project be pursuing value? Eric Siegel Executives know the importance of predictive AI. As Unilever CDO Morgan Vawter wrote, “Its practical deployment represents the forefront of human progress: improving operations with science.” But there’s bad news for data scientists: Your predictive AI project will probably fail. Your customer probably won’t operationalize the machine learning model you deliver. They won’t use it, act on it or integrate it. Sadly, most models developed for deployment wind up on the shelf. But you probably already knew that. A plethora of industry research and anecdotal wisdom has let that cat out of the bag. And yet what most data professionals haven’t come to understand is the true reason why. After all, shouldn’t a great model be a sure bet to deploy? No. It won’t deploy because you haven’t closed the sale. When you deliver a model, you haven’t necessarily finished selling, no matter how much of a done deal it may seem to be. Until your model actually deploys, you must continue to actively sell it to stakeholders – in compelling, concrete business terms like improved profit – even if they’ve already agreed, signed and paid. Standard AI Metrics Don’t Launch Models Standard technical metrics are “fundamentally useless to and disconnected from business stakeholders.” Katie Malone, Harvard Data Science Review “The most important metric for your model’s performance is the business metric that it is supposed to influence.” Wafiq Syed, data product manager, Walmart “Don’t show a confusion matrix to executives!” Data Scientist Henry Castellanos “Nothing flies without KPIs.” AI thought leader Lasse Rindom Only a concrete projection of value compels a business. Your customer and other decision makers may well have been… The post How To Overcome Predictive AI’s Everyday Failure appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Stakeholder skepticism about machine learning often rings true: If the data scientist hasn’t measured the potential value, then how could the project be pursuing value? Eric Siegel Executives know the importance of predictive AI. As Unilever CDO Morgan Vawter wrote, “Its practical deployment represents the forefront of human progress: improving operations with science.” But there’s bad news for data scientists: Your predictive AI project will probably fail. Your customer probably won’t operationalize the machine learning model you deliver. They won’t use it, act on it or integrate it. Sadly, most models developed for deployment wind up on the shelf. But you probably already knew that. A plethora of industry research and anecdotal wisdom has let that cat out of the bag. And yet what most data professionals haven’t come to understand is the true reason why. After all, shouldn’t a great model be a sure bet to deploy? No. It won’t deploy because you haven’t closed the sale. When you deliver a model, you haven’t necessarily finished selling, no matter how much of a done deal it may seem to be. Until your model actually deploys, you must continue to actively sell it to stakeholders – in compelling, concrete business terms like improved profit – even if they’ve already agreed, signed and paid. Standard AI Metrics Don’t Launch Models Standard technical metrics are “fundamentally useless to and disconnected from business stakeholders.” Katie Malone, Harvard Data Science Review “The most important metric for your model’s performance is the business metric that it is supposed to influence.” Wafiq Syed, data product manager, Walmart “Don’t show a confusion matrix to executives!” Data Scientist Henry Castellanos “Nothing flies without KPIs.” AI thought leader Lasse Rindom Only a concrete projection of value compels a business. Your customer and other decision makers may well have been…

How To Overcome Predictive AI’s Everyday Failure

Stakeholder skepticism about machine learning often rings true: If the data scientist hasn’t measured the potential value, then how could the project be pursuing value?

Eric Siegel

Executives know the importance of predictive AI. As Unilever CDO Morgan Vawter wrote, “Its practical deployment represents the forefront of human progress: improving operations with science.”

But there’s bad news for data scientists: Your predictive AI project will probably fail. Your customer probably won’t operationalize the machine learning model you deliver. They won’t use it, act on it or integrate it. Sadly, most models developed for deployment wind up on the shelf.

But you probably already knew that. A plethora of industry research and anecdotal wisdom has let that cat out of the bag.

And yet what most data professionals haven’t come to understand is the true reason why. After all, shouldn’t a great model be a sure bet to deploy?

No. It won’t deploy because you haven’t closed the sale. When you deliver a model, you haven’t necessarily finished selling, no matter how much of a done deal it may seem to be. Until your model actually deploys, you must continue to actively sell it to stakeholders – in compelling, concrete business terms like improved profit – even if they’ve already agreed, signed and paid.

Standard AI Metrics Don’t Launch Models

Only a concrete projection of value compels a business. Your customer and other decision makers may well have been excited about the project’s intent at its outset. But without visibility into the business value – a view that plainly displays how the model will drive decisions and the expected value to be gained – you’ll ultimately begin to hear excuses not to deploy. Put another way, without the enthusiasm that only a bottom-line promise can produce, the project will be among those first cut when the next inevitable financial crunch arrives. People don’t buy what they don’t understand.

As with any operational improvement, with or without analytics, a business can’t move forward until there’s a credible estimation of how much it’s going to improve those operations – a calculation of the business improvement you stand to gain – in straightforward terms like profit or other KPIs.

Yet most predictive AI projects don’t move beyond standard technical metrics – such as precision, recall, AUC or F-score. These represent the data scientist’s training, tools and comfort zone. And they serve well to establish model soundness, assessing whether the model performs relatively well, substantially better than guessing. If so, the model is potentially valuable.

But these metrics provide little to no insight into how valuable the model would be if used. They are arcane from the standpoint of business professionals and business objectives.

Technical Performance Alone Cannot Sell The Value

You may be the technical heavyweight in the room, but if you’re presenting only standard technical performance metrics, you’re committing a cardinal business sin and deep down your colleagues know it: You’re proposing a systematic operational change with no concrete estimate of its upside.

After all, when you build something, you’ve got to check out how good it is before you use it. You can’t launch a new rocket until you’ve stress-tested it in its intended usage, according to the KPIs that matter. Without a credible estimate of the potential value, the launch would be a shot in the dark. Sensible decision-makers would scrub the launch. Indeed, most predictive AI deployments are scrubbed.

No matter how advanced your analytical method may be, the decision maker’s gut skepticism rings true: If you haven’t measured the potential business value, then how could the project be pursuing business value? They may not feel that they hold the “tech authority” to say so, but they’ll find any of a myriad reasons to not move forward with operationalization.

Instead, make it a no-brainer for your customer: Sell the potential business value. This will give decision makers essentially no choice but to deploy, and will give the fruits of your number crunching a chance to realize a business impact. Everyone already understands, in general terms, the potential value of driving decisions with model predictions – that’s what has brought the project this far. Now it’s time to follow through on your business-oriented swing by establishing how much business value the deployment stands to deliver. This way, you’ll knock it out of the park.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/ericsiegel/2025/09/08/how-to-overcome-predictive-ais-everyday-failure/

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.010072
$0.010072$0.010072
-0.82%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Fed rate decision September 2025

Fed rate decision September 2025

The post Fed rate decision September 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WASHINGTON – The Federal Reserve on Wednesday approved a widely anticipated rate cut and signaled that two more are on the way before the end of the year as concerns intensified over the U.S. labor market. In an 11-to-1 vote signaling less dissent than Wall Street had anticipated, the Federal Open Market Committee lowered its benchmark overnight lending rate by a quarter percentage point. The decision puts the overnight funds rate in a range between 4.00%-4.25%. Newly-installed Governor Stephen Miran was the only policymaker voting against the quarter-point move, instead advocating for a half-point cut. Governors Michelle Bowman and Christopher Waller, looked at for possible additional dissents, both voted for the 25-basis point reduction. All were appointed by President Donald Trump, who has badgered the Fed all summer to cut not merely in its traditional quarter-point moves but to lower the fed funds rate quickly and aggressively. In the post-meeting statement, the committee again characterized economic activity as having “moderated” but added language saying that “job gains have slowed” and noted that inflation “has moved up and remains somewhat elevated.” Lower job growth and higher inflation are in conflict with the Fed’s twin goals of stable prices and full employment.  “Uncertainty about the economic outlook remains elevated” the Fed statement said. “The Committee is attentive to the risks to both sides of its dual mandate and judges that downside risks to employment have risen.” Markets showed mixed reaction to the developments, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average up more than 300 points but the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite posting losses. Treasury yields were modestly lower. At his post-meeting news conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell echoed the concerns about the labor market. “The marked slowing in both the supply of and demand for workers is unusual in this less dynamic…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:44
[Tambay] Tres niños na bagitos

[Tambay] Tres niños na bagitos

Mga bagong lublób sa malupit na mundo ng Philippine politics ang mga newbies na sina Leviste, Barzaga, at San Fernando, kaya madalas nakakangilo ang kanilang ikinikilos
Share
Rappler2026/01/18 10:00
Massive Whale Buying Spree Could Trigger XRP Supply Shock as Exchange Balances Drop to Lowest Since 2023 ⋆ ZyCrypto

Massive Whale Buying Spree Could Trigger XRP Supply Shock as Exchange Balances Drop to Lowest Since 2023 ⋆ ZyCrypto

The post Massive Whale Buying Spree Could Trigger XRP Supply Shock as Exchange Balances Drop to Lowest Since 2023 ⋆ ZyCrypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/18 10:41