Cyberattacks targeting Gulf institutions have surged as military action by the US and Israel against Iran has escalated, reinforcing how modern conflict is spillingCyberattacks targeting Gulf institutions have surged as military action by the US and Israel against Iran has escalated, reinforcing how modern conflict is spilling

Gulf systems targeted by wave of war-linked cyberattacks

2026/03/10 11:29
5 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]
  • 100 attacks in first 72 hours of war
  • Hackers target banks, telcos and airports
  • Minor disruption despite increase

Cyberattacks targeting Gulf institutions have surged as military action by the US and Israel against Iran has escalated, reinforcing how modern conflict is spilling into digital infrastructure and impacting key industries.

Banks, telecom operators, aviation systems and government platforms across the Gulf have all been targeted, according to cybersecurity and intelligence companies monitoring forums on the dark web – a hidden part of the internet that allows users to operate anonymously – and messaging platforms such as Telegram.

More than 60 hacker groups or collectives mobilised within hours of the start of the conflict and over 100 cyber incidents were recorded across the Middle East in the first 72 hours, analysts said.

Most attacks were relatively unsophisticated and operational disruption has so far been limited.

But the ease of launching such attacks is lowering the barrier to disruption. This includes website defacements, distributed-denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks – when a website is overwhelmed with traffic to render it unusable – and attempted intrusions into financial and government systems.

“For $100 you can access a DDoS toolkit for a month and launch unlimited attacks,” said Manohar Reddy Pagilla, a threat researcher at cybersecurity company CloudSEK. Stolen corporate credentials circulating in cybercrime markets can cost as little as $10, he added.

The targets reflect the strategic importance of Gulf economies to global energy and trade.

Entities cited in attack claims include Saudi Arabia’s Riyad Bank and Al Rajhi Bank, Kuwait International Airport, Bahrain’s Batelco, UAE telecom operator du and a number of government ministries in the GCC.

The companies have not yet responded to requests for comment.

“Cyberattacks on energy infrastructure, ports and aviation systems can create unpredictable market conditions, halt exports and trigger cascading shortages for commodities like oil,” said Morey Haber, chief security adviser at software management company, BeyondTrust.

The Gulf is particularly exposed. Digital systems corroborate oil shipping schedules, airline operations and financial transactions across hubs such as Dubai, Riyadh and Doha.

The average cost of a cybersecurity breach in the Middle East is about $8 million, nearly double the global average of $4.45 million, according to the World Economic Forum.

Governments across the GCC are investing in digital defences and the region’s cyber-threat intelligence market is expected to exceed $31 billion by 2030.

“The cyber spillover from the [US-Israel and Iranian] escalation is already affecting Gulf economies mainly through disruption and defensive costs, rather than confirmed destructive attacks and concrete numbers on their direct financial cost,” said Marwan Hachem, founder of cyber security company FearsOff. 

While Gulf readiness is stronger than a decade ago, Haber said that preparedness still varies by sector. “Persistent weaknesses remain around identity security, third-party access, operational-technology visibility and coordination between public and private responders.”

Many attacks appear designed to generate publicity rather than lasting disruption. “They make a lot of noise,” Pagilla said.

Hacktivist collectives, ransomware operators – cybercriminals who lock victims’ data and demand payment to restore access – and brokers of stolen data have been the most active. Analysts say such groups often exaggerate attacks on high-profile organisations to damage reputations and amplify political messaging.

Several Iran-aligned hacktivist groups, including Handala, DieNet and Ghost Princess, have claimed responsibility for attacks on regional infrastructure during the latest escalation, according to CloudSEK.

Even a brief disruption to service can carry significant costs, analysts say. If a banking system goes offline for just a few minutes, it can translate into millions of dollars in interrupted transactions.

UAE banks Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank and First Abu Dhabi Bank reported prolonged interruptions over the past week, although it cannot be confirmed if they were related to cyberattacks. Neither bank responded to AGBI’s request for comments. 

More news on the Iran conflict

  • Iran war panic buying pushes oil prices to four-year peak
  • Iranian wallets move millions in crypto despite internet blackout
  • UAE banks can withstand Iran war stresses, says governor

The financial impact is rarely immediate. Losses tend to emerge over time, particularly when stolen data begins circulating in underground markets.

Once credentials or internal data are leaked and sold, affected companies remain exposed. They often face repeated intrusion attempts for months as attackers exploit the information.

“Now that the region is on attackers’ radar, the implications will likely emerge over the next six months to a year,” Pagilla said.

Cyber operations have long featured in geopolitical confrontation. The Stuxnet worm – widely attributed to US and Israeli intelligence – sabotaged Iranian nuclear centrifuges more than a decade ago.

Russia’s campaigns against Ukraine have demonstrated how cyber tools can disrupt power grids, deploy destructive malware and shape information flows at scale. The 2017 NotPetya attack, for example, initially targeted Ukrainian networks but spread globally and caused an estimated $10 billion in damage to multinational companies, according to academics.

“The longer-term implication is that cyber operations are now fully integrated into military conflict,” Hachem said.

“For highly digitised Gulf economies, cyber resilience and protection of financial and energy systems will become an even more critical element of national security,” he added.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

WORLD3 and PlaysOut Unite to Advance Web3 Mini-Game Ecosystem

WORLD3 and PlaysOut Unite to Advance Web3 Mini-Game Ecosystem

WORLD3, a project known for combining Web3 technology with autonomous agents and artificial intelligence, has entered into a strategic collaboration with PlaysOut
Share
CoinTrust2026/03/10 15:08
TrendX Taps Trusta AI to Develop Safer and Smarter Web3 Network

TrendX Taps Trusta AI to Develop Safer and Smarter Web3 Network

The purpose of collaboration is to advance the Web3 landscape by combining the decentralized infrastructure of TrendX with AI-led capabilities of Trusta AI.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07
UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52