The post Treasury Strategy Weakens with Slowing Demand and Falling mNAV appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. After long being regarded as a major driver of institutional capital into crypto, the Treasury model shows cracks as buying demand drops sharply, many companies trade below their mNAV, and the risk of forced asset sales looms.  These signs suggest that the “treasury play” is no longer an unbeatable strategy, but could evolve into a systemic risk for BTC and ETH. Sponsored Sponsored Crypto Treasury Lost Magic? According to analyst Caprioleio, the pace of purchases by Bitcoin Treasury Companies (publicly traded firms that accumulate BTC as treasury assets) has slowed considerably. These firms are still buying, but daily purchases’ “frequency” and “intensity” have fallen compared to prior peaks. This shift has led the market to question whether the model remains sustainable or if it’s merely a temporary dip.  “Are institutions exhausted, or is it just a dip?” Caprioleio asked. Treasury company demand. Source: Caprioleio Sponsored Sponsored One view suggests that treasury companies act in cycles, rather than buying consistently. Their willingness to keep accumulating even during periods of lower rates shows a more strategic accumulation approach rather than fatigue. It may be a tactical pause before re-engaging.  “Probably just waiting for better entry points,” one X user shared. Beyond reduced accumulation, the market risks force treasury companies to sell assets. An analysis by TheDeFinvestor revealed that several ETH treasury companies are now trading below their mNAV. This means their public stock price is lower than the net value of ETH they hold. ETH treasury company’s mNAV. Source: TheDeFinvestor When mNAV < 1, the ability to raise funds through equity or bond issuance is impaired, companies that rely on continuous capital raises to purchase more ETH may hit a ceiling on available funding, and in a worst-case scenario, may be forced to sell assets to meet obligations. The system’s response to… The post Treasury Strategy Weakens with Slowing Demand and Falling mNAV appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. After long being regarded as a major driver of institutional capital into crypto, the Treasury model shows cracks as buying demand drops sharply, many companies trade below their mNAV, and the risk of forced asset sales looms.  These signs suggest that the “treasury play” is no longer an unbeatable strategy, but could evolve into a systemic risk for BTC and ETH. Sponsored Sponsored Crypto Treasury Lost Magic? According to analyst Caprioleio, the pace of purchases by Bitcoin Treasury Companies (publicly traded firms that accumulate BTC as treasury assets) has slowed considerably. These firms are still buying, but daily purchases’ “frequency” and “intensity” have fallen compared to prior peaks. This shift has led the market to question whether the model remains sustainable or if it’s merely a temporary dip.  “Are institutions exhausted, or is it just a dip?” Caprioleio asked. Treasury company demand. Source: Caprioleio Sponsored Sponsored One view suggests that treasury companies act in cycles, rather than buying consistently. Their willingness to keep accumulating even during periods of lower rates shows a more strategic accumulation approach rather than fatigue. It may be a tactical pause before re-engaging.  “Probably just waiting for better entry points,” one X user shared. Beyond reduced accumulation, the market risks force treasury companies to sell assets. An analysis by TheDeFinvestor revealed that several ETH treasury companies are now trading below their mNAV. This means their public stock price is lower than the net value of ETH they hold. ETH treasury company’s mNAV. Source: TheDeFinvestor When mNAV < 1, the ability to raise funds through equity or bond issuance is impaired, companies that rely on continuous capital raises to purchase more ETH may hit a ceiling on available funding, and in a worst-case scenario, may be forced to sell assets to meet obligations. The system’s response to…

Treasury Strategy Weakens with Slowing Demand and Falling mNAV

After long being regarded as a major driver of institutional capital into crypto, the Treasury model shows cracks as buying demand drops sharply, many companies trade below their mNAV, and the risk of forced asset sales looms. 

These signs suggest that the “treasury play” is no longer an unbeatable strategy, but could evolve into a systemic risk for BTC and ETH.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Crypto Treasury Lost Magic?

According to analyst Caprioleio, the pace of purchases by Bitcoin Treasury Companies (publicly traded firms that accumulate BTC as treasury assets) has slowed considerably. These firms are still buying, but daily purchases’ “frequency” and “intensity” have fallen compared to prior peaks. This shift has led the market to question whether the model remains sustainable or if it’s merely a temporary dip.

Treasury company demand. Source: Caprioleio

Sponsored

Sponsored

One view suggests that treasury companies act in cycles, rather than buying consistently. Their willingness to keep accumulating even during periods of lower rates shows a more strategic accumulation approach rather than fatigue. It may be a tactical pause before re-engaging.

Beyond reduced accumulation, the market risks force treasury companies to sell assets. An analysis by TheDeFinvestor revealed that several ETH treasury companies are now trading below their mNAV. This means their public stock price is lower than the net value of ETH they hold.

ETH treasury company’s mNAV. Source: TheDeFinvestor

When mNAV < 1, the ability to raise funds through equity or bond issuance is impaired, companies that rely on continuous capital raises to purchase more ETH may hit a ceiling on available funding, and in a worst-case scenario, may be forced to sell assets to meet obligations.

The system’s response to Bitcoin has been even more severe. The shares of many “Bitcoin treasury companies” have experienced much greater volatility than BTC. 

Sponsored

Sponsored

As BeInCrypto reported, when the bitcoin price dropped, the share prices of these companies plunged 50–80% in a short period. This has inflicted heavy losses on shareholders and shaken confidence in treasury stocks relative to their underlying assets. The fact that shares are collapsing faster than BTC highlights two risks: dilution/settlement pressure and the psychological spiral that accelerates mass sell-offs.

Greatest Financial Arbitrage or Ponzi?

At their core, these companies raise capital (through equity or bonds) and use the proceeds to buy BTC/ETH, expecting the assets to appreciate faster than the cost of capital. If the cycle continues upward, the model works. But if capital raising becomes difficult (due to falling mNAV, higher interest rates, or weakening market confidence), the fragility of the model is exposed.

Some analysts call this “the greatest financial arbitrage in history.” Others, however, bluntly describe it as a “Ponzi scheme” sustained by the belief that prices will always rise.

The treasury model has created a new class of investors and fueled significant buying demand during bull markets. But today, weak demand, falling mNAV, and severe share price volatility are warning signs of a harsh shake-out phase. Ultimately, only companies with sustainable financial models, transparency, and strong risk management will survive.

Source: https://beincrypto.com/the-shaking-confidence-in-treasury-strategy-it-slowes-down-now/

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$95,181.06
$95,181.06$95,181.06
-0.41%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.