The post Hyperliquid RWA open interest holds amid methodology debate appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Verdict: The 1.3B RWA OI claim lacks credible support The post Hyperliquid RWA open interest holds amid methodology debate appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Verdict: The 1.3B RWA OI claim lacks credible support

Hyperliquid RWA open interest holds amid methodology debate

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Verdict: The 1.3B RWA OI claim lacks credible support

A circulating claim says Hyperliquid’s RWA trading volume hit a new high while open interest topped USD 1.3 billion. Cross-checking recent industry reporting shows that figure lacks credible support.

Platform-wide open interest has been reported at materially higher levels. as reported by MEXC News, Hyperliquid’s total open interest was about USD 7.73 billion in December 2025 (https://www.mexc.co/en-IN/news/262053). AInvest later described roughly USD 7.3 billion as a two‑month high in early January 2026 (https://www.ainvest.com/news/hyperliquid-open-interest-hits-month-high-growing-perpetual-dex-competition-2601/), underscoring that a USD 1.3 billion threshold does not align with recent totals.

Within the HIP-3 subset that includes RWA perpetuals, figures have been documented below USD 1.3 billion over the same period. Forklog reported HIP-3 open interest rising from about USD 260 million to approximately USD 790 million into late January 2026 (https://forklog.com/en/open-interest-on-hyperliquid-reaches-record-790-million/). Taken together, available numbers point to either much higher platform OI or sub‑USD‑1.3B HIP-3 OI, not a newly verified USD 1.3B RWA-specific threshold.

What RWA/HIP-3 are and why that matters now

Real World Assets (RWA) refer to contracts that map on-chain exposure to off-chain economic references. On Hyperliquid, HIP-3 denotes a defined subset of perpetual markets where such contracts are listed and traded.

Why this matters now: claims about “RWA open interest” may refer to the HIP-3 subset rather than platform-wide metrics. Interpreting the claim correctly requires distinguishing total exchange OI from HIP-3-only and from individual contract OI.

Available data suggest no verified inflection at the USD 1.3 billion mark for RWAs. Instead, recent reporting shows total platform OI in the USD 7–8 billion range while HIP-3 OI trended toward the high hundreds of millions, indicating growth but not the claimed threshold.

“ChainCatcher reported, ‘all HIP-3 markets recorded around USD 2.2 billion in daily volume, about 30% of the platform’s total of USD 7.34 billion’” (https://www.chaincatcher.com/en/article/2250021). This distribution helps explain why single-subset or per-contract figures can diverge sharply from platform-wide OI snapshots.

Reconciling Hyperliquid open interest, RWA perpetuals, and HIP-3 markets

Definitions: platform-wide vs HIP-3 subset vs per-contract metrics

Platform-wide open interest aggregates all perpetual markets on Hyperliquid. The HIP-3 subset aggregates only those listings within the HIP-3 category, including RWA perpetuals. Per‑contract OI measures one market’s outstanding positions.

Mislabeling a subset (HIP-3) or a single contract as “RWA open interest on Hyperliquid” can understate the platform total. Conversely, citing the platform total to describe HIP-3 can overstate the subset.

Why figures differ: snapshots, contract coverage, and data methodologies

Time snapshots matter when markets are volatile; an intra-day high may not match end‑of‑day tallies. Contract coverage differs across sources, some aggregate HIP-3 only, while others show platform totals.

Methodologies also vary: some providers convert collateralized notional to USD using real-time marks, while others use fixed points or exclude illiquid contracts. These choices drive visible discrepancies across reports.

FAQ about Hyperliquid open interest

What is the latest verified Hyperliquid open interest and how is it calculated across RWA/HIP-3 markets?

Recent reports show total OI near USD 7–8B (MEXC; AInvest). HIP-3 subset OI rose to about USD 790M (Forklog). Calculations aggregate per-contract positions net of offsets.

How much volume and open interest do HIP-3 markets contribute compared to Hyperliquid’s total?

ChainCatcher reported HIP-3 daily volume around USD 2.2B, ~30% of total USD 7.34B. Forklog noted HIP-3 OI near USD 790M versus platform OI around USD 7–8B.

Source: https://coincu.com/markets/hyperliquid-rwa-open-interest-holds-amid-methodology-debate/

Market Opportunity
Allo Logo
Allo Price(RWA)
$0.002043
$0.002043$0.002043
+0.78%
USD
Allo (RWA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Tether Backs Ark Labs’ $5.2 Million Bet on Bitcoin’s Stablecoin Revival

Tether Backs Ark Labs’ $5.2 Million Bet on Bitcoin’s Stablecoin Revival

The post Tether Backs Ark Labs’ $5.2 Million Bet on Bitcoin’s Stablecoin Revival appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Ark Labs secured backing from Tether
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/12 21:44
Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API

Turn lengthy earnings call transcripts into one-page insights using the Financial Modeling Prep APIPhoto by Bich Tran Earnings calls are packed with insights. They tell you how a company performed, what management expects in the future, and what analysts are worried about. The challenge is that these transcripts often stretch across dozens of pages, making it tough to separate the key takeaways from the noise. With the right tools, you don’t need to spend hours reading every line. By combining the Financial Modeling Prep (FMP) API with Groq’s lightning-fast LLMs, you can transform any earnings call into a concise summary in seconds. The FMP API provides reliable access to complete transcripts, while Groq handles the heavy lifting of distilling them into clear, actionable highlights. In this article, we’ll build a Python workflow that brings these two together. You’ll see how to fetch transcripts for any stock, prepare the text, and instantly generate a one-page summary. Whether you’re tracking Apple, NVIDIA, or your favorite growth stock, the process works the same — fast, accurate, and ready whenever you are. Fetching Earnings Transcripts with FMP API The first step is to pull the raw transcript data. FMP makes this simple with dedicated endpoints for earnings calls. If you want the latest transcripts across the market, you can use the stable endpoint /stable/earning-call-transcript-latest. For a specific stock, the v3 endpoint lets you request transcripts by symbol, quarter, and year using the pattern: https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={q}&year={y}&apikey=YOUR_API_KEY here’s how you can fetch NVIDIA’s transcript for a given quarter: import requestsAPI_KEY = "your_api_key"symbol = "NVDA"quarter = 2year = 2024url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={API_KEY}"response = requests.get(url)data = response.json()# Inspect the keysprint(data.keys())# Access transcript contentif "content" in data[0]: transcript_text = data[0]["content"] print(transcript_text[:500]) # preview first 500 characters The response typically includes details like the company symbol, quarter, year, and the full transcript text. If you aren’t sure which quarter to query, the “latest transcripts” endpoint is the quickest way to always stay up to date. Cleaning and Preparing Transcript Data Raw transcripts from the API often include long paragraphs, speaker tags, and formatting artifacts. Before sending them to an LLM, it helps to organize the text into a cleaner structure. Most transcripts follow a pattern: prepared remarks from executives first, followed by a Q&A session with analysts. Separating these sections gives better control when prompting the model. In Python, you can parse the transcript and strip out unnecessary characters. A simple way is to split by markers such as “Operator” or “Question-and-Answer.” Once separated, you can create two blocks — Prepared Remarks and Q&A — that will later be summarized independently. This ensures the model handles each section within context and avoids missing important details. Here’s a small example of how you might start preparing the data: import re# Example: using the transcript_text we fetched earliertext = transcript_text# Remove extra spaces and line breaksclean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip()# Split sections (this is a heuristic; real-world transcripts vary slightly)if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1)else: prepared, qna = clean_text, ""print("Prepared Remarks Preview:\n", prepared[:500])print("\nQ&A Preview:\n", qna[:500]) With the transcript cleaned and divided, you’re ready to feed it into Groq’s LLM. Chunking may be necessary if the text is very long. A good approach is to break it into segments of a few thousand tokens, summarize each part, and then merge the summaries in a final pass. Summarizing with Groq LLM Now that the transcript is clean and split into Prepared Remarks and Q&A, we’ll use Groq to generate a crisp one-pager. The idea is simple: summarize each section separately (for focus and accuracy), then synthesize a final brief. Prompt design (concise and factual) Use a short, repeatable template that pushes for neutral, investor-ready language: You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call sectionfor {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise.Return:1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets)2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened)3) Forward outlook (specific statements)4) Risks / watch-outs5) Q&A takeaways (if present)Text:<<<{section_text}>>> Python: calling Groq and getting a clean summary Groq provides an OpenAI-compatible API. Set your GROQ_API_KEY and pick a fast, high-quality model (e.g., a Llama-3.1 70B variant). We’ll write a helper to summarize any text block, then run it for both sections and merge. import osimport textwrapimport requestsGROQ_API_KEY = os.environ.get("GROQ_API_KEY") or "your_groq_api_key"GROQ_BASE_URL = "https://api.groq.com/openai/v1" # OpenAI-compatibleMODEL = "llama-3.1-70b" # choose your preferred Groq modeldef call_groq(prompt, temperature=0.2, max_tokens=1200): url = f"{GROQ_BASE_URL}/chat/completions" headers = { "Authorization": f"Bearer {GROQ_API_KEY}", "Content-Type": "application/json", } payload = { "model": MODEL, "messages": [ {"role": "system", "content": "You are a precise, neutral equity research analyst."}, {"role": "user", "content": prompt}, ], "temperature": temperature, "max_tokens": max_tokens, } r = requests.post(url, headers=headers, json=payload, timeout=60) r.raise_for_status() return r.json()["choices"][0]["message"]["content"].strip()def build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year): template = """ You are an equity research analyst. Summarize the following earnings call section for {symbol} ({quarter} {year}). Be factual and concise. Return: 1) TL;DR (3–5 bullets) 2) Results vs. guidance (what improved/worsened) 3) Forward outlook (specific statements) 4) Risks / watch-outs 5) Q&A takeaways (if present) Text: <<< {section_text} >>> """ return textwrap.dedent(template).format( symbol=symbol, quarter=quarter, year=year, section_text=section_text )def summarize_section(section_text, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024"): if not section_text or section_text.strip() == "": return "(No content found for this section.)" prompt = build_prompt(section_text, symbol, quarter, year) return call_groq(prompt)# Example usage with the cleaned splits from Section 3prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol="NVDA", quarter="Q2", year="2024")final_one_pager = f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks — Key Points{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()print(final_one_pager[:1200]) # preview Tips that keep quality high: Keep temperature low (≈0.2) for factual tone. If a section is extremely long, chunk at ~5–8k tokens, summarize each chunk with the same prompt, then ask the model to merge chunk summaries into one section summary before producing the final one-pager. If you also fetched headline numbers (EPS/revenue, guidance) earlier, prepend them to the prompt as brief context to help the model anchor on the right outcomes. Building the End-to-End Pipeline At this point, we have all the building blocks: the FMP API to fetch transcripts, a cleaning step to structure the data, and Groq LLM to generate concise summaries. The final step is to connect everything into a single workflow that can take any ticker and return a one-page earnings call summary. The flow looks like this: Input a stock ticker (for example, NVDA). Use FMP to fetch the latest transcript. Clean and split the text into Prepared Remarks and Q&A. Send each section to Groq for summarization. Merge the outputs into a neatly formatted earnings one-pager. Here’s how it comes together in Python: def summarize_earnings_call(symbol, quarter, year, api_key, groq_key): # Step 1: Fetch transcript from FMP url = f"https://financialmodelingprep.com/api/v3/earning_call_transcript/{symbol}?quarter={quarter}&year={year}&apikey={api_key}" resp = requests.get(url) resp.raise_for_status() data = resp.json() if not data or "content" not in data[0]: return f"No transcript found for {symbol} {quarter} {year}" text = data[0]["content"] # Step 2: Clean and split clean_text = re.sub(r'\s+', ' ', text).strip() if "Question-and-Answer" in clean_text: prepared, qna = clean_text.split("Question-and-Answer", 1) else: prepared, qna = clean_text, "" # Step 3: Summarize with Groq prepared_summary = summarize_section(prepared, symbol, quarter, year) qna_summary = summarize_section(qna, symbol, quarter, year) # Step 4: Merge into final one-pager return f"""# {symbol} Earnings One-Pager — {quarter} {year}## Prepared Remarks{prepared_summary}## Q&A Highlights{qna_summary}""".strip()# Example runprint(summarize_earnings_call("NVDA", 2, 2024, API_KEY, GROQ_API_KEY)) With this setup, generating a summary becomes as simple as calling one function with a ticker and date. You can run it inside a notebook, integrate it into a research workflow, or even schedule it to trigger after each new earnings release. Free Stock Market API and Financial Statements API... Conclusion Earnings calls no longer need to feel overwhelming. With the Financial Modeling Prep API, you can instantly access any company’s transcript, and with Groq LLM, you can turn that raw text into a sharp, actionable summary in seconds. This pipeline saves hours of reading and ensures you never miss the key results, guidance, or risks hidden in lengthy remarks. Whether you track tech giants like NVIDIA or smaller growth stocks, the process is the same — fast, reliable, and powered by the flexibility of FMP’s data. Summarize Any Stock’s Earnings Call in Seconds Using FMP API was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
PayPal USD Expands to TRON Network via LayerZero

PayPal USD Expands to TRON Network via LayerZero

The post PayPal USD Expands to TRON Network via LayerZero appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This content is provided by a sponsor. PRESS RELEASE. September 18, 2025 – Geneva, Switzerland – TRON DAO, the community-governed DAO dedicated to accelerating the decentralization of the internet through blockchain technology and decentralized applications (dApps), announced today that PayPal USD will be available on the TRON network through Stargate Hydra as a permissionless token, […] Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/paypal-usd-expands-to-tron-network-via-layerzero/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 23:12