The post Crypto News: Did Garrett Jin Trigger the $50M AAVE Slippage Trade? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights: Crypto News: A trader swapped $50MThe post Crypto News: Did Garrett Jin Trigger the $50M AAVE Slippage Trade? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights: Crypto News: A trader swapped $50M

Crypto News: Did Garrett Jin Trigger the $50M AAVE Slippage Trade?

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Key Insights:

  • Crypto News: A trader swapped $50M USDT for just $36K AAVE due to extreme slippage.
  • 13 wallets linked to Garrett Jin suggest he may be the “mystery whale.”
  • Lost funds went to liquidity providers, arbitrage bots, and protocol fees.

The crypto market remains shocked after a massive DeFi trade triggered an enormous loss due to slippage. The trade, involving AAVE-related tokens, resulted in a swap of over $50 million in assets for just under $36,000.

This crypto news has sparked speculation about the involvement of Bitcoin OG Garrett Jin, as on-chain analysts trace the mysterious wallets behind the transaction.

Crypto News: $50M AAVE Trade Triggers Massive Slippage

The latest crypto news surrounds a massive DeFi transaction involving AAVE. This development comes after a trader attempted to swap roughly $50.4 million in USDT for AAVE tokens on the Ethereum network.

However, the trade resulted in a huge loss due to alleged slippage. This leaves the user with only around $36,000 worth of AAVE tokens.

In an X post, Aave founder Stani Kulechov noted that the trader executed the transaction through the Aave interface. He added that it relies on routing infrastructure, such as CoW Swap, to process large swaps.

Crypto News- $50M Slippage | Source: X

Due to the unusually large size of the order, the platform displayed clear warnings about extraordinary slippage. It also required the user to manually confirm the risks before proceeding. Despite these warnings, the trader approved the transaction on a mobile device and completed the swap.

Reportedly, the transaction process resulted in other participants obtaining most of the available funds. The data shows that the trader received AAVE worth $36,000, while CoW Swap fees reached approximately $6,19,000. MEV bots took more than $9.9 million, while the block builder who processed the transaction received more than $34 million.

In response to the crypto news, Kulechov confirmed that the team plans to refund around $6,00,000 in fees generated from the transaction. The team is trying to contact the wallet owner.

Garrett Jin Might Be Behind the $50M AAVE Slippage Trade

Following the massive crypto swap, reports hint at the event’s possible connection with trader Garrett Jin. According to Lookonchain data, 13 wallets appear to be connected to him.

These wallets received USDC or USDT from Binance on February 16 and 20. They became active again today and moved funds to two new wallets. One of the wallets even used the same Binance deposit address as Garrett Jin.

The timing of this crypto news aligns with his previous large sales of 261,024 ETH ($543M) and 11,318 BTC ($761M) on February 15 and 20, coinciding with the stablecoin withdrawals from Binance. This strongly suggests that Garrett Jin might be the “mystery whale” behind this massive slippage trade.

Crypto News Reveals What Happened to the $50M in the AAVE Trade

After the crypto news, many are wondering, ‘What happened to the $50 million USDT?’ In an X post, expert Nicki Sanders stated that it didn’t disappear. Instead, it went to liquidity providers, arbitrage traders, and protocol fees.

The trader attempted to purchase 50 million dollars worth of AAVE through one DeFi exchange. However, the liquidity pool did not meet his requirements. The first AAVE tokens were acquired at market value, but subsequent purchases occurred at significantly increased prices. That resulted in substantial slippage.

USDT went to liquidity providers, while bots sold AAVE at higher than market prices to make profits, and the pool collected its earnings.

Analysts explain that DeFi systems execute user trades exactly as users request. This creates high costs for users who make major errors. That’s because DeFi lacks the ability to execute complex trades through OTC desks and automated trading systems, which exist in conventional finance.

Source: https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2026/03/13/crypto-news-did-garrett-jin-trigger-the-50m-aave-slippage-trade/

Market Opportunity
AaveToken Logo
AaveToken Price(AAVE)
$112.19
$112.19$112.19
-1.59%
USD
AaveToken (AAVE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

US appeals court denies Custodia Bank rehearing in Fed case

US appeals court denies Custodia Bank rehearing in Fed case

The post US appeals court denies Custodia Bank rehearing in Fed case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has rejected
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/14 05:08
Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13
Litecoin Halving Set for Next 500 Days, Will Lower Rewards Lift LTC Price?

Litecoin Halving Set for Next 500 Days, Will Lower Rewards Lift LTC Price?

The post Litecoin Halving Set for Next 500 Days, Will Lower Rewards Lift LTC Price? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Litecoin halving is about 500 days ahead
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/14 05:42