The Bitcoin Policy Institute plans to challenge Bitcoin risk treatment under Basel standards as the Fed moves toward Basel implementation.The Bitcoin Policy Institute plans to challenge Bitcoin risk treatment under Basel standards as the Fed moves toward Basel implementation.

Bitcoin Policy Institute Pushes Fed to Revise Bitcoin Risk Rules

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]
Bitcoin Policy Institute Pushes Fed To Revise Bitcoin Risk Rules

U.S. regulators are preparing to release new banking rules that will affect how banks handle digital assets on their balance sheets. The Bitcoin Policy Institute plans to challenge how the framework classifies Bitcoin risk. The group aims to influence upcoming Federal Reserve proposals linked to international banking standards.

Bitcoin Policy Institute Challenges Bitcoin Risk Treatment

The Bitcoin Policy Institute plans to respond to the Federal Reserve’s upcoming proposal on bank asset risk weighting. The organization intends to review the proposal and submit formal comments. It seeks regulatory changes that could reshape how banks treat Bitcoin exposure.

The Federal Reserve recently announced plans to issue a public consultation on implementing global Basel standards. These standards guide how banks measure asset risk and determine capital requirements. Consequently, regulators will define how digital assets appear within bank balance sheets.

The institute argues that the current Basel framework assigns Bitcoin an extremely high risk classification. Under the rules, banks must treat Bitcoin holdings as high-risk assets. Therefore, financial institutions face stricter capital requirements when holding cryptocurrency.

Basel Rules Assign High Capital Requirements To Bitcoin

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision created global rules that guide banking risk management. These rules classify assets according to their potential financial risk. As a result, banks must hold different levels of capital depending on the asset category.

Within this system, Bitcoin falls into a high-risk category that carries a 1,250 percent risk weighting. Such a rating requires banks to hold equivalent capital for any Bitcoin exposure. Consequently, banks must fully back Bitcoin positions with approved collateral.

Other assets receive far lower classifications under the same regulatory framework. Cash, government bonds, and physical gold carry zero percent risk weighting. Therefore, banks can hold these assets without allocating additional regulatory capital.

The Bitcoin Policy Institute argues that the classification places digital assets at a structural disadvantage. The organization claims the treatment limits financial institutions that want to offer Bitcoin-related services. As a result, banks may avoid integrating Bitcoin into their operations.

Federal Reserve Moves Toward Final Basel Implementation

The Federal Reserve plans to introduce rules that complete the final stage of Basel implementation in the United States. Regulators intend to strengthen financial stability while maintaining support for economic activity. Therefore, the proposal aims to balance growth and financial safety.

Supervisory officials stated that the rules should improve regulatory efficiency across the banking sector. They also intend to maintain strong risk management across financial institutions. Consequently, banks will adjust capital strategies based on the finalized guidelines.

The upcoming proposal will open a public comment period before regulators finalize the framework. Organizations, financial institutions, and policy groups will submit feedback during this stage. Therefore, regulators may revise aspects of the proposal before issuing final rules.

The debate over Bitcoin’s classification has grown since the Basel Committee introduced crypto guidelines in 2021. The committee placed digital assets in a high-risk category called Group Two. Under that structure, banks can hold only limited amounts of these assets.

Group Two assets remain capped at a small percentage of a bank’s overall holdings. The rule restricts exposure to assets considered volatile or uncertain. Consequently, the classification continues to shape how global banks approach cryptocurrency services.

This article was originally published as Bitcoin Policy Institute Pushes Fed to Revise Bitcoin Risk Rules on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

US appeals court denies Custodia Bank rehearing in Fed case

US appeals court denies Custodia Bank rehearing in Fed case

The post US appeals court denies Custodia Bank rehearing in Fed case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has rejected
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/14 05:08
Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13
Litecoin Halving Set for Next 500 Days, Will Lower Rewards Lift LTC Price?

Litecoin Halving Set for Next 500 Days, Will Lower Rewards Lift LTC Price?

The post Litecoin Halving Set for Next 500 Days, Will Lower Rewards Lift LTC Price? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Litecoin halving is about 500 days ahead
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/14 05:42