Real America's Voice host Gina Loudon criticized President Donald Trump after he told his followers that the MAGA movement was defined by supporting the war withReal America's Voice host Gina Loudon criticized President Donald Trump after he told his followers that the MAGA movement was defined by supporting the war with

Right-wing host rips into Trump for defining MAGA as pro-war

2026/03/16 22:26
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Real America's Voice host Gina Loudon criticized President Donald Trump after he told his followers that the MAGA movement was defined by supporting the war with Iran. She argued that Trump's actions could have "implications on the midterms."

In a Truth Social post, Trump slammed right-wing pundits who had disagreed with Fox News host Mark Levin, a proponent of the war.

"Those that speak ill of Mark will quickly fall by the wayside, as do the people whose ideas, policies, and footings are not sound. THEY ARE NOT MAGA," Trump wrote. "I AM, and MAGA includes not allowing Iran, a Sick, Demented, and Violent Terrorist Regime, to have a Nuclear Weapon to blow up the United States of America, the Middle East, and, ultimately, the rest of the World. MAGA is about stopping them cold, and that is exactly what we are doing."

On Monday, Loudon lamented that Trump was trying to stifle debate about Iran within the MAGA movement.

"We were describing MAGA as this huge tent," co-host Terrence Bates told Loudon. "There might be an argument this morning, though, that that tent is falling in on itself."

"Well, gosh, midterms are my thoughts," Loudon replied. "Yeah, I sort of wish that our president would let MAGA have the conversation it's having right now without alienating anybody because I just don't want to lose any votes in midterms, and we need it so badly."

"MAGA's taken a long look at itself in the mirror, trying to decide what they are," she continued. "MAGA happened during the Tea Party. And that was the formation of what today we call MAGA, or the America First Movement. And there, it's just, you know, it's looking in the mirror. It's redefining itself. And I just, my personal opinion is that Donald Trump is such a great president. He should keep being president and just let everyone have this conversation.

"I fear, David, what implications this could have on the midterms."

Loudon noted that many MAGA supporters "were really letting Trump off the hook on this."

"They were saying, you know, hey, I love the president," she said. "I may not agree with him on this or that. But I hate for him to insert himself in this and alienate what is a substantial portion of the MAGA base that is out there having a lot of thoughts about."

"I think to the average rank and file MAGA person out there, they're like, I love my president, I support my president, and I don't understand what's going on in the undercurrent," she added. "So that's why I hate that President Trump inserted himself because it's going to almost force the hand of a lot of people in MAGA."

"I think they might stay home," co-host David Brody said of MAGA voters. "I think some folks just might stay home. That's what it is. I think to suppress the turnout. If you get, when voters get cynical, they stay home. It's just what they do. When they start to distrust their politicians, they stay home."

Loudon insisted that it was a "statistical fact" that MAGA voters would withhold their votes.

"And I hope that, you know, President Trump has always been a person who could really bring people together that have never been brought together before," she said.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

The first-ever ETFs for XRP and Dogecoin are expected to launch in the US tomorrow. Here's what you need to know. Continue Reading: And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 04:33
Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

BitcoinWorld Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience ZURICH, March 2025 – The Swiss National Bank faces mounting
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/16 23:10
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26