By Eric, Foresight News An account named X was registered two months ago. The token issuance platform Soar, which has less than 2,000 followers, became popular because of an article with over 350,000 views (https://x.com/LaunchOnSoar/status/1965476405455864175). In this article, Soar openly criticizes the current chaos in the cryptocurrency market, pointing out three important issues: the issued tokens have no real value, the lack of transparency in token sales, and the founders have no motivation to focus on long-term value because their holdings are too low. Soar is attempting to revolutionize the industry with a patent-pending token standard and a new platform. Currently, the project team has only provided a conceptual overview of the new token standard and has stated that further explanation will be provided before its official release. For now, I will describe Soar's operating mechanism based on the information currently available. Soar's new token standard is called DRP (Digital Representation of Participation), which roughly translates to "digital representation of participation." Soar offers a rather obscure explanation of the DRP mechanism: Tokens deployed through the DRP standard are not, and will never be, any form of equity, either in nature or in fact; They represent only certain value relations: values that are retained, or that should be attributed elsewhere; This relationship is governed by a private contract (the “Agreement”) between the party deploying the tokens (the “Issuer”) and the entity providing access to the DRP Standard (the “Provider”); Under the DRP standard, the issuer loses a certain amount of value when deploying tokens, but can regain that value at any time by reclaiming the tokens; After the initial deployment, the Issuer must wait for a period of time before releasing any of the Tokens it holds onto to the market (the “Holding Period”); After the Holding Period, whenever the Issuer releases previously held Tokens, it must clearly disclose to the outside world the number of Tokens it intends to release and the reasons for the release ("Disclosure"); After any disclosure, the issuer must wait for a further period before releasing the tokens to the market; At any point in time, the agreement automatically reflects the relative value between the issuer and the provider, and has specific trigger conditions ("events"), once triggered, the relevant value will be automatically settled between the two parties; The DRP standard also includes many other mechanisms/features to improve transparency, strengthen accountability, and create a balance of incentives between token holders and issuers. Under this standard, the company acts as the token issuer and Soar acts as the DRP standard provider: The company itself holds a certain number of such tokens, which represents the value retained by the company at any point in time; The portion of tokens not held by the company at any point in time (i.e., held by external parties) corresponds to the value that the company no longer retains or controls at that point in time; Pursuant to the private contract, Soar is entitled to, and the Company shall pay to Soar in priority, the value not retained by the Company; In the event of a Company Liquidity Event, Soar becomes the recipient of such value and may decide how to dispose of it at its sole discretion. Generally speaking, tokens issued using the DRP standard must establish a "value relationship" at the outset of issuance. This value relationship means the token must represent a specific value, such as the company's value, and cannot simply be launched as a governance token. Furthermore, this value relationship is contractually bound in advance. However, Soar also stated that this token will not be equity. The author speculates that Soar aims to launch a token that can represent the specific value of an entity but is not subject to traditional equity restrictions, so as to clearly solve the problem of "what exactly" the issued token is in the early stage. After the tokens are issued, the issuer must hold them for a period of time before they can start selling them. Before selling, they need to disclose the intention to sell and the specific quantity. Even after the disclosure is completed, they still need to wait for a period of time before they can officially sell them. The most difficult part of the DRP mechanism is the value that the token issuer (the so-called company) must pay to Soar when certain conditions are triggered. I believe this mechanism is similar to the "privatization and delisting" of listed companies in the stock market: if a listed company wishes to privatize and delist, it must repurchase publicly issued shares to reduce the public holdings below the exchange's regulations. In Soar's design, tokens not held by the "company" will be the company's responsibility in the event of liquidation. This significantly prevents manipulation. Soar explicitly stated that the design of DRP draws on some of the regulations of the traditional securities market, blocking the practice of arbitrarily issuing tokens and then selling them and then Rugging them at the root, so that tokens issued based on this standard must represent actual value and strictly comply with pre-sale disclosure guidelines. Without additional information from Soar, this is the best conclusion we can draw at this point. I've always believed that the key prerequisite for the next altcoin bull market is to address the question of "what exactly do altcoins represent?" Currently, many projects issue tokens whose value cannot be linked to their actual value, and no project clearly explains what their tokens represent. These issues are likely the biggest obstacles facing investors who favor cryptocurrencies but currently only choose Bitcoin. Although the Soar mechanism design standards are very strict, whether the designed standards are implemented through a "gentleman's agreement" or at the smart contract level; if the "company" is liquidated, how to ensure that the "company" will be responsible for the tokens circulating externally, we need to wait for the project to provide more information.By Eric, Foresight News An account named X was registered two months ago. The token issuance platform Soar, which has less than 2,000 followers, became popular because of an article with over 350,000 views (https://x.com/LaunchOnSoar/status/1965476405455864175). In this article, Soar openly criticizes the current chaos in the cryptocurrency market, pointing out three important issues: the issued tokens have no real value, the lack of transparency in token sales, and the founders have no motivation to focus on long-term value because their holdings are too low. Soar is attempting to revolutionize the industry with a patent-pending token standard and a new platform. Currently, the project team has only provided a conceptual overview of the new token standard and has stated that further explanation will be provided before its official release. For now, I will describe Soar's operating mechanism based on the information currently available. Soar's new token standard is called DRP (Digital Representation of Participation), which roughly translates to "digital representation of participation." Soar offers a rather obscure explanation of the DRP mechanism: Tokens deployed through the DRP standard are not, and will never be, any form of equity, either in nature or in fact; They represent only certain value relations: values that are retained, or that should be attributed elsewhere; This relationship is governed by a private contract (the “Agreement”) between the party deploying the tokens (the “Issuer”) and the entity providing access to the DRP Standard (the “Provider”); Under the DRP standard, the issuer loses a certain amount of value when deploying tokens, but can regain that value at any time by reclaiming the tokens; After the initial deployment, the Issuer must wait for a period of time before releasing any of the Tokens it holds onto to the market (the “Holding Period”); After the Holding Period, whenever the Issuer releases previously held Tokens, it must clearly disclose to the outside world the number of Tokens it intends to release and the reasons for the release ("Disclosure"); After any disclosure, the issuer must wait for a further period before releasing the tokens to the market; At any point in time, the agreement automatically reflects the relative value between the issuer and the provider, and has specific trigger conditions ("events"), once triggered, the relevant value will be automatically settled between the two parties; The DRP standard also includes many other mechanisms/features to improve transparency, strengthen accountability, and create a balance of incentives between token holders and issuers. Under this standard, the company acts as the token issuer and Soar acts as the DRP standard provider: The company itself holds a certain number of such tokens, which represents the value retained by the company at any point in time; The portion of tokens not held by the company at any point in time (i.e., held by external parties) corresponds to the value that the company no longer retains or controls at that point in time; Pursuant to the private contract, Soar is entitled to, and the Company shall pay to Soar in priority, the value not retained by the Company; In the event of a Company Liquidity Event, Soar becomes the recipient of such value and may decide how to dispose of it at its sole discretion. Generally speaking, tokens issued using the DRP standard must establish a "value relationship" at the outset of issuance. This value relationship means the token must represent a specific value, such as the company's value, and cannot simply be launched as a governance token. Furthermore, this value relationship is contractually bound in advance. However, Soar also stated that this token will not be equity. The author speculates that Soar aims to launch a token that can represent the specific value of an entity but is not subject to traditional equity restrictions, so as to clearly solve the problem of "what exactly" the issued token is in the early stage. After the tokens are issued, the issuer must hold them for a period of time before they can start selling them. Before selling, they need to disclose the intention to sell and the specific quantity. Even after the disclosure is completed, they still need to wait for a period of time before they can officially sell them. The most difficult part of the DRP mechanism is the value that the token issuer (the so-called company) must pay to Soar when certain conditions are triggered. I believe this mechanism is similar to the "privatization and delisting" of listed companies in the stock market: if a listed company wishes to privatize and delist, it must repurchase publicly issued shares to reduce the public holdings below the exchange's regulations. In Soar's design, tokens not held by the "company" will be the company's responsibility in the event of liquidation. This significantly prevents manipulation. Soar explicitly stated that the design of DRP draws on some of the regulations of the traditional securities market, blocking the practice of arbitrarily issuing tokens and then selling them and then Rugging them at the root, so that tokens issued based on this standard must represent actual value and strictly comply with pre-sale disclosure guidelines. Without additional information from Soar, this is the best conclusion we can draw at this point. I've always believed that the key prerequisite for the next altcoin bull market is to address the question of "what exactly do altcoins represent?" Currently, many projects issue tokens whose value cannot be linked to their actual value, and no project clearly explains what their tokens represent. These issues are likely the biggest obstacles facing investors who favor cryptocurrencies but currently only choose Bitcoin. Although the Soar mechanism design standards are very strict, whether the designed standards are implemented through a "gentleman's agreement" or at the smart contract level; if the "company" is liquidated, how to ensure that the "company" will be responsible for the tokens circulating externally, we need to wait for the project to provide more information.

New coin issuance platform Soar: rejecting air coins and reconstructing token issuance logic with contractual constraints

2025/09/13 08:30

By Eric, Foresight News

An account named X was registered two months ago. The token issuance platform Soar, which has less than 2,000 followers, became popular because of an article with over 350,000 views (https://x.com/LaunchOnSoar/status/1965476405455864175).

In this article, Soar openly criticizes the current chaos in the cryptocurrency market, pointing out three important issues: the issued tokens have no real value, the lack of transparency in token sales, and the founders have no motivation to focus on long-term value because their holdings are too low.

Soar is attempting to revolutionize the industry with a patent-pending token standard and a new platform. Currently, the project team has only provided a conceptual overview of the new token standard and has stated that further explanation will be provided before its official release. For now, I will describe Soar's operating mechanism based on the information currently available.

Soar's new token standard is called DRP (Digital Representation of Participation), which roughly translates to "digital representation of participation." Soar offers a rather obscure explanation of the DRP mechanism:

  • Tokens deployed through the DRP standard are not, and will never be, any form of equity, either in nature or in fact;
  • They represent only certain value relations: values that are retained, or that should be attributed elsewhere;
  • This relationship is governed by a private contract (the “Agreement”) between the party deploying the tokens (the “Issuer”) and the entity providing access to the DRP Standard (the “Provider”);
  • Under the DRP standard, the issuer loses a certain amount of value when deploying tokens, but can regain that value at any time by reclaiming the tokens;
  • After the initial deployment, the Issuer must wait for a period of time before releasing any of the Tokens it holds onto to the market (the “Holding Period”);
  • After the Holding Period, whenever the Issuer releases previously held Tokens, it must clearly disclose to the outside world the number of Tokens it intends to release and the reasons for the release ("Disclosure");
  • After any disclosure, the issuer must wait for a further period before releasing the tokens to the market;
  • At any point in time, the agreement automatically reflects the relative value between the issuer and the provider, and has specific trigger conditions ("events"), once triggered, the relevant value will be automatically settled between the two parties;
  • The DRP standard also includes many other mechanisms/features to improve transparency, strengthen accountability, and create a balance of incentives between token holders and issuers.

Under this standard, the company acts as the token issuer and Soar acts as the DRP standard provider:

  • The company itself holds a certain number of such tokens, which represents the value retained by the company at any point in time;
  • The portion of tokens not held by the company at any point in time (i.e., held by external parties) corresponds to the value that the company no longer retains or controls at that point in time;
  • Pursuant to the private contract, Soar is entitled to, and the Company shall pay to Soar in priority, the value not retained by the Company;
  • In the event of a Company Liquidity Event, Soar becomes the recipient of such value and may decide how to dispose of it at its sole discretion.

Generally speaking, tokens issued using the DRP standard must establish a "value relationship" at the outset of issuance. This value relationship means the token must represent a specific value, such as the company's value, and cannot simply be launched as a governance token. Furthermore, this value relationship is contractually bound in advance.

However, Soar also stated that this token will not be equity. The author speculates that Soar aims to launch a token that can represent the specific value of an entity but is not subject to traditional equity restrictions, so as to clearly solve the problem of "what exactly" the issued token is in the early stage.

After the tokens are issued, the issuer must hold them for a period of time before they can start selling them. Before selling, they need to disclose the intention to sell and the specific quantity. Even after the disclosure is completed, they still need to wait for a period of time before they can officially sell them.

The most difficult part of the DRP mechanism is the value that the token issuer (the so-called company) must pay to Soar when certain conditions are triggered. I believe this mechanism is similar to the "privatization and delisting" of listed companies in the stock market: if a listed company wishes to privatize and delist, it must repurchase publicly issued shares to reduce the public holdings below the exchange's regulations. In Soar's design, tokens not held by the "company" will be the company's responsibility in the event of liquidation. This significantly prevents manipulation.

Soar explicitly stated that the design of DRP draws on some of the regulations of the traditional securities market, blocking the practice of arbitrarily issuing tokens and then selling them and then Rugging them at the root, so that tokens issued based on this standard must represent actual value and strictly comply with pre-sale disclosure guidelines.

Without additional information from Soar, this is the best conclusion we can draw at this point. I've always believed that the key prerequisite for the next altcoin bull market is to address the question of "what exactly do altcoins represent?" Currently, many projects issue tokens whose value cannot be linked to their actual value, and no project clearly explains what their tokens represent. These issues are likely the biggest obstacles facing investors who favor cryptocurrencies but currently only choose Bitcoin.

Although the Soar mechanism design standards are very strict, whether the designed standards are implemented through a "gentleman's agreement" or at the smart contract level; if the "company" is liquidated, how to ensure that the "company" will be responsible for the tokens circulating externally, we need to wait for the project to provide more information.

Market Opportunity
RealLink Logo
RealLink Price(REAL)
$0.07694
$0.07694$0.07694
-2.74%
USD
RealLink (REAL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Vitalik Buterin Supports Native Rollup Integration on Ethereum

Vitalik Buterin Supports Native Rollup Integration on Ethereum

The post Vitalik Buterin Supports Native Rollup Integration on Ethereum appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Vitalik Buterin supports ZK Rollups for
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/19 15:43
Fan Token Firm Chiliz Acquires 2-Time ‘Dota 2’ Champions, OG Esports

Fan Token Firm Chiliz Acquires 2-Time ‘Dota 2’ Champions, OG Esports

The post Fan Token Firm Chiliz Acquires 2-Time ‘Dota 2’ Champions, OG Esports appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief The Chiliz Group has acquired a controlling stake in OG Esports, a prominent competitive gaming organization. OG Esports unveiled its own fan token on Chiliz’s Socios.com platform back in 2020. It recently hit an all-time high price. Chiliz has teased various future team-related benefits for OG token holders, along with a new Web3-related project. The Chiliz Group, which operates the Socios.com crypto fan token platform, announced Tuesday that it has acquired a 51% controlling stake in OG Esports, the competitive gaming organization founded in 2015 by Dota 2 legends Johan “nOtail” Sundstein and Sébastien “Ceb” Debs. OG made history as the first team to win consecutive titles at The International—the annual, high-profile Dota 2 world championship tournament—in 2018 and 2019, and has since expanded into multiple games including Counter-Strike, Honor of Kings, and Marvel Rivals. The team was also the first esports organization to join the Socios platform with the 2020 debut of its own fan token, which Chiliz said recently became the first esports team token to exceed a $100 million market capitalization. OG was recently priced at $16.88, up nearly 9% on the day following the announcement. The token’s price peaked at a new all-time high of $24.78 last week ahead of The International 2025, where OG did not compete this year. Following the acquisition, Xavier Oswald will assume the CEO role, while the co-founders will turn their attention to “a new strategic project consolidating the team’s competitive foundation [and] driving innovation at the intersection of esports and Web3,” per a press release. No further details were provided regarding that project. “Bringing OG into the Chiliz Group is a major step toward further strengthening fan experiences, one where the community doesn’t just watch from the sidelines but gets to shape the journey,” Chiliz CEO Alex Dreyfus…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:40
NEAR Price Prediction: Testing Critical $1.88 Resistance with $2.10-$2.35 Targets by February 2026

NEAR Price Prediction: Testing Critical $1.88 Resistance with $2.10-$2.35 Targets by February 2026

The post NEAR Price Prediction: Testing Critical $1.88 Resistance with $2.10-$2.35 Targets by February 2026 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Rebeca Moen
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/19 15:34