The post Canton Network gains focus as Moody’s tests on-chain ratings appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. No confirmed Moody’s Canton Network integration for onThe post Canton Network gains focus as Moody’s tests on-chain ratings appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. No confirmed Moody’s Canton Network integration for on

Canton Network gains focus as Moody’s tests on-chain ratings

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

No confirmed Moody’s Canton Network integration for on-chain credit ratings

There is no verified public confirmation that Moody’s has integrated with Canton Network to deliver on-chain credit ratings. Public listings identify Moody’s as a founding institution behind Canton, not a live ratings publisher, according to Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canton_Network).

The known activity to date centers on proofs-of-concept and pilots rather than a production Canton deployment. The sections below distinguish verified pilots from unverified integration claims.

Why this Moody’s on-chain ratings claim matters

Credit ratings are core to risk, collateral, and disclosure workflows in regulated markets. Publishing them on-chain could automate eligibility checks, accelerate settlement, and improve auditability, if confidentiality and governance are preserved.

Strategically, the venue and method of delivery matter. A blockchain-agnostic approach with privacy-preserving verification and revocation controls would better align with compliance, data governance, and interoperability requirements across tokenized markets.

In media remarks, Rajeev Bamra, Head of Strategy, Digital Economy at Moody’s, has highlighted a strategic gap for blockchain delivery of ratings and research. “on-chain ratings and research,” said Rajeev Bamra, Head of Strategy, Digital Economy at Moody’s, as reported by DLNews (https://www.dlnews.com/articles/defi/moodys-brings-bond-credit-ratings-to-solana-and-other-blockchains/).

in the absence of an official announcement naming Canton as the delivery venue, claims of an integration remain unverified. Founding participation does not imply production-grade publishing.

Any production rollout would need robust access controls, privacy guarantees, provenance, and revocation mechanisms. Legal, operational, and data-liability considerations would also need to be addressed before broad market reliance.

What Moody’s has tested for on-chain ratings so far

Risk oracle and ZKP approach tested on Solana testnet

As reported by CoinDesk, Moody’s and Untangled Finance trialed a risk oracle on Solana’s Amoy testnet that published, updated, and revoked ratings using zero-knowledge proofs to shield proprietary inputs (https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2025/03/19/untangled-finance-brings-moody-s-credit-scores-on-chain/). The design aimed to verify rating provenance while minimizing disclosure on-chain.

Municipal bond tokenization pilot linking Moody’s ratings via API

As reported by Cointelegraph, a municipal bond tokenization pilot with Alphaledger on Solana linked Moody’s credit ratings on-chain via API rather than embedding full rating logic (https://cointelegraph.com/explained/moodys-brings-credit-ratings-onchain-via-solana-explained/). This approach emphasized data access and traceability over native computation.

FAQ about Canton Network

What has Moody’s officially announced about delivering on-chain credit ratings and where?

No public confirmation of a Canton-based integration. Founding participation does not constitute live on-chain publishing or a production deployment.

Which pilots or proofs-of-concept has Moody’s run for on-chain ratings (e.g., Solana, risk oracles, ZKPs)?

Confirmed pilots include a Solana testnet risk‑oracle using ZKPs and a municipal-bond tokenization trial linking ratings via API. Both emphasize privacy, provenance, and revocation.

Source: https://coincu.com/blockchain/canton-network-gains-focus-as-moodys-tests-on-chain-ratings/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.