The post $100M in crypto shifted by BlackRock – Panic move or just some rebalancing? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. When BlackRock moved nearly $100M in BitcoinThe post $100M in crypto shifted by BlackRock – Panic move or just some rebalancing? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. When BlackRock moved nearly $100M in Bitcoin

$100M in crypto shifted by BlackRock – Panic move or just some rebalancing?

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

When BlackRock moved nearly $100M in Bitcoin [BTC] and Ethereum [ETH] to Coinbase, the immediate reaction was fear of a sell-off. However, it’s not that straightforward. 

The firm deposited 930 BTC worth $65.48M and 12,687 ETH worth $27.75M into Coinbase, with more deposits likely.

Source: Onchain Lens/X

However, these transfers are most likely part of ETF operations, where assets are routinely shifted between cold storage and exchanges to manage inflows, outflows, and rebalancing.

Rather than signaling a dump, this reflects how large institutions operate in crypto today. 

However, even if the intention isn’t bearish, the effect can still be negative in the short term. When large amounts of crypto are moved to exchanges like Coinbase Prime, it increases the chances of selling.

This adds pressure on prices and can trigger panic or quick drops, especially if the market is already in the “Extreme Fear” zone.

Source: Alternative

When should you actually worry?

Needless to say, one transfer alone isn’t a major red flag, but it becomes concerning if a pattern forms. This pattern includes repeated large deposits, consistent ETF outflows, and prices falling on high volume. 

If these signals appear together, it could point to real institutional selling pressure. Simply put, for now, the market might just be cautious, not panicked.

Institutions like BlackRock are adjusting their positions, while retail traders are reacting quickly to price moves, creating an unstable market.

Market trends are difficult and all over the place

Even though BlackRock’s stock is strong, crypto prices have been falling. At the time of writing, Bitcoin was down about 4%, with Ethereum down even more.

In fact, prices are moving quickly up and down, evidence of emotional, short-term trading rather than long-term confidence.

Ethereum, in particular, has been seeing sharp swings due to leveraged trades. Indicators like RSI show that small rallies don’t last long either. 

Source: Santiment

Additionally, the MVRV ratio revealed the market was stuck in a cycle, with prices rising briefly, traders taking profits, and prices falling again. In fact, neither buyers nor sellers seemed to be in control. 

Source: Santiment

Moreover, on 18 March, BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) saw $33.9 million in outflows, ending a 7-day inflow streak, while its Ethereum ETF (ETHA) recorded a smaller $1.3 million outflow.

These amounts may seem small, but they likely explain why BlackRock moved assets to Coinbase to sell and meet investor withdrawals.

Not the first time…

This isn’t new. A similar move happened in December 2025 when over $125 million in Bitcoin was sent to Coinbase under the same conditions. So, this isn’t panic selling, it’s simply a response to investors pulling money out.

Instead of guessing whether BlackRock is bullish or bearish, the key thing to watch is ETF outflows. If withdrawals continue, selling pressure in the market is likely to persist.


Final Summary

  • BlackRock’s $100M transfer isn’t panic selling, but a market move driven by ETF inflows and outflows.
  • Until demand returns, ETF-driven selling pressure is likely to keep markets under stress.

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/100m-in-crypto-shifted-by-blackrock-panic-move-or-just-some-rebalancing/

Market Opportunity
Movement Logo
Movement Price(MOVE)
$0.02076
$0.02076$0.02076
+1.16%
USD
Movement (MOVE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
The Virtual Hospital: How IT Infrastructure is Powering the Next Wave of Remote Patient Monitoring

The Virtual Hospital: How IT Infrastructure is Powering the Next Wave of Remote Patient Monitoring

Introduction to the Virtual Hospital Revolution The healthcare industry is undergoing a transformative shift as virtual hospitals emerge at the forefront of patient
Share
Techbullion2026/03/20 14:45
People have their uses: Agentic Wallet and the next decade of wallets

People have their uses: Agentic Wallet and the next decade of wallets

Written by: Lacie Zhang, Bitget Wallet Researcher In 1984, Apple (Macintosh) killed the command line with a mouse. In 2026, Agent is killing the mouse. This is
Share
PANews2026/03/20 14:13