The post BARD Technical Analysis Mar 23 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BARD is trading within a clear downtrend; bearish structure dominates with the recentThe post BARD Technical Analysis Mar 23 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BARD is trading within a clear downtrend; bearish structure dominates with the recent

BARD Technical Analysis Mar 23

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

BARD is trading within a clear downtrend; bearish structure dominates with the recent lower high and lower low formation. A BOS above the $0.5757 swing high could enable a trend change, but BTC pressure is challenging altcoins.

Market Structure Overview

BARD’s current market structure analysis reveals a clear downtrend. The price has moved away from the higher highs/higher lows (HH/HL) bullish structure and reinforces its bearish character with the lower highs/lower lows (LH/LL) pattern. On the daily chart, the latest swing low formed at $0.4741, standing as a critical support level with 78/100 strength. The current price around $0.50 is positioned below EMA20 ($0.83), while the Supertrend indicator also gives a bearish signal pointing to $0.89 resistance. Although RSI at 31.21 is close to the oversold zone, the MACD’s negative histogram confirms low momentum. In the MTF structure (1D/3D/1W), there are 13 strong levels: 1D has 2 supports/4 resistances, 3D has 2S/2R, 1W has 2S/5R distribution presenting a resistance-heavy outlook. This shows the overall structure is bearish and requires breaking multiple resistances for upward moves. The market maintains the downtrend with the LH/LL sequence, awaiting an upward BOS for any CHoCH (Change of Character).

Trend Analysis: Uptrend or Downtrend?

Uptrend Signals

For an uptrend, the HH/HL structure must be re-established. BARD, which has moved in the $0.48-$0.52 range with a +1.70% increase in the last 24 hours, is holding above the $0.4741 swing low. This level forms a strong base with a 78/100 score, and a higher low (HL) formation from here could open the HH target toward the $0.5757 swing high. However, bullish momentum will remain weak without a close above EMA20 ($0.83) and RSI rising above 50. Although the 1W timeframe in MTF points to upside potential at $1.2323 (low 30/100 score), this scenario depends on a BTC-supported rally. For now, the upside signals are speculative and not strong enough to change the structure.

Downtrend Risk

The downtrend is clear with the LH/LL pattern: A new lower high formed without breaking the latest swing high $0.5757 (72/100), confirmed afterward by the $0.4741 lower low. In this classic bearish structure, the price carries a risk of declining toward the $0.3624 swing low (67/100). With Supertrend bearish and MACD negative, a BOS below $0.4741 opens downside targets to $-0.3779 (structural risk despite low score). Abundance of resistances in 1D/1W (total 11R) limits upside moves, and continuation of LH/LL appears likely.

Structure Break (BOS) Levels

BOS (Break of Structure) is the key to trend change. For bullish BOS: A daily close above the $0.5757 swing high (72/100) turns LH into HH, opening the path to $0.9249 (64/100); then $1.7300 (63/100) as the main target. This would be a CHoCH signal and initiate the HH/HL structure. Bearish BOS: A close below the $0.4741 swing low (78/100) creates a new LL and accelerates the decline to $0.3624. Confirmation is required in 3D/1W for MTF alignment; in the current structure, bearish BOS is the closer risk. These levels are critical for structure invalidation: The downtrend remains valid without an upside BOS.

Swing Points and Their Importance

Latest Swing Highs

The most critical swing high $0.5757 (72/100) confirms the downtrend as the latest LH. As long as this level is not broken, it retains its resistance role; a BOS above it turns the structure bullish. Higher levels $0.9249 (64/100) and $1.7300 (63/100) are long-term targets and strong in 1W MTF. These swings align with %61.8 fib retracements and their tests are the last hurdle before CHoCH.

Latest Swing Lows

$0.4741 (78/100) is the strongest swing low and current support; holding here with HL potential gives hope for trend transition. Below it, $0.3624 (67/100) is critical; its break creates LL and triggers panic selling. These points are supported by volume profile, forming the structure’s base. Holding above $0.4741 is required for defense.

Bitcoin Correlation

Altcoins like BARD are directly affected by BTC movements. While BTC at $70,924 (+3.79%) is in a sideways trend, the Supertrend bearish signal requires caution for altcoins. BTC supports at $70,592 / $68,165 / $64,272; a drop below these levels accelerates LH/LL in BARD and pressures the $0.4741 test. Conversely, BTC breaking resistances at $72,180 / $74,437 / $76,060 could trigger BARD’s $0.5757 BOS with an altcoin rally. Rising BTC dominance is bearish; the current sideways BTC increases BARD’s independent downside risk. Follow BTC correlation for BARD Spot Analysis and BARD Futures Analysis.

Structural Outlook and Expectations

Overall structure is bearish: Downtrend dominates with LH/LL sequence, $0.50 price below EMA20, and indicators supportive. To invalidate the structure, $0.5757 BOS and HH/HL confirmation are required; otherwise, tests of $0.4741 / $0.3624 are likely. With MTF resistance-heavy, upside moves could be selling opportunities. Educationally, monitor swing points: BOS levels are key for trend change. With risk management, long positions above $0.4741, short above it can be considered. The market can change quickly; follow spot and futures analyses.

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Strategy Analyst: David Kim

Macro market analysis and portfolio management

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/bard-technical-analysis-march-23-2026-market-structure

Market Opportunity
Lombard Logo
Lombard Price(BARD)
$0.4797
$0.4797$0.4797
-2.32%
USD
Lombard (BARD) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

The post What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Legal experts have raised concerns that ABC’s decision to pull “Jimmy Kimmel Live” from its airwaves following the host’s controversial comments about the death of Charlie Kirk, could be because the Trump administration violated free speech protections through a practice known as “jawboning.” Jimmy Kimmel speaks at Disney’s Advertising Upfront on May 13 in New York City. Disney via Getty Images Key Facts Disney-owned ABC announced Wednesday Kimmel’s show will be taken off the air “indefinitely,” which came after ABC affiliate owner Nexstar—which needs Federal Communications Commission approval to complete a planned acquisition of competitor Tegna Inc.—said it would not air the program due to Kimmel’s comments Monday regarding Kirk’s death and the reaction to it. The sudden move drew particular concern because it came only hours after FCC head Brendan Carr called for ABC to “take action” against Kimmel, and cryptically suggested his agency could take action saying, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.” While ABC and Nexstar have not given any indication their decisions were influenced by Carr’s comments, the timing raised concerns among legal experts that the Trump administration’s threats may have unlawfully coerced ABC and Nexstar to punish Kimmel, which could constitute jawboning. Jawboning refers to “the use of official speech to inappropriately compel private action,” as defined by the Cato Institute, as governments or public officials—who cannot directly punish private actors for speech they don’t like—can use strongman tactics to try and indirectly silence critics or influence private companies’ actions. The practice is fairly loosely defined and there aren’t many legal safeguards dictating how violations of it are enforced, the Knight First Amendment Institute notes, but the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled it can be unlawful and an impermissible First Amendment violation when it involves specific threats. The White…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 07:17
Why Fintech Platforms Are Growing Faster Than Traditional Banks

Why Fintech Platforms Are Growing Faster Than Traditional Banks

Fintech platforms are outpacing traditional banks in growth across nearly every measurable dimension. Customer acquisition rates, revenue growth, geographic expansion
Share
Techbullion2026/03/24 07:58
Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly

Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly

BitcoinWorld Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly TOKYO, Japan — March 2025: Japan’s National Consumer
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/24 08:10