PHILIPPINE BANKS are open to incorporating sustainability standards in their frameworks but are still seeking clarity about what kinds of activities are consideredPHILIPPINE BANKS are open to incorporating sustainability standards in their frameworks but are still seeking clarity about what kinds of activities are considered

PHL banks need clarity on ‘green’ financing to boost ESG compliance, BSP says

2026/03/24 00:03
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

PHILIPPINE BANKS are open to incorporating sustainability standards in their frameworks but are still seeking clarity about what kinds of activities are considered environmentally or socially sustainable, a Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) official said on Monday.

BSP Assistant Governor and Chief Sustainability Officer Pia Bernadette Roman-Tayag said a clearer sustainable finance taxonomy would encourage more lenders to support environmental, social, and governance (ESG) measures.

“[Banks need] clarity,” she told reporters on the sidelines of the Economic Journalists Association of the Philippines’ sustainability forum in Makati City. “I think the sustainable finance taxonomy is a good way to show banks this is what we mean by activities that are green, that are contributing to our environmental objectives.”

“So, we want that to be as granular as possible so it’s clear for them, so when they make investment decisions, they know they’re aligned.”

In the BSP’s Banking Sector Outlook Survey for 2023, 90.3% of banks surveyed said they were willing to invest in sustainable financing, particularly in areas such as agriculture, renewable energy, energy efficiency, and sustainable water and wastewater management.

She said local banks have been building their capacity for sustainable financing since the BSP established its regulations six years ago.

“I could say that more banks are now integrating ESG into their governance and their risk management system.”

In April 2020, the BSP introduced a sustainable finance framework for banks, requiring them to integrate sustainability principles into their environmental and social risk management, governance frameworks, strategies, and operations.

Ms. Roman-Tayag said the Philippines is struggling with climate change adaptation amid limited financing, noting that only below 10% of global climate finance goes to this while 90% is allotted for mitigation.

“Our problem really is adaptation. Climate change is already here, and the Philippines is so vulnerable,” she said during a panel discussion, adding that the Philippines needs additional funding for these efforts.

She said these would help cushion the economy from climate risks.   

“Adaptation is what we need to make our economy, our firms, our households, our individuals more resilient,” Ms. Roman-Tayag said. “We also want that financing goes to sound adaptation activities that can reduce the risks of climate change.

The central bank’s mandated credit for agriculture and agrarian sectors has also been effective in pushing for sustainable finance in the banking sector, she added.

Based on preliminary BSP data, banks lent out about P2.52 trillion to the agriculture sector as of September last year. This includes loans for agrarian reform beneficiaries, agrarian reform communities, or other priority sectors.

This accounted for 101.78% of the banking system’s P2.46-trillion total loanable funds during the period, well above the BSP’s 25% quota. — Katherine K. Chan

Market Opportunity
PHILCOIN Logo
PHILCOIN Price(PHL)
$0.02287
$0.02287$0.02287
-0.08%
USD
PHILCOIN (PHL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

The post What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Legal experts have raised concerns that ABC’s decision to pull “Jimmy Kimmel Live” from its airwaves following the host’s controversial comments about the death of Charlie Kirk, could be because the Trump administration violated free speech protections through a practice known as “jawboning.” Jimmy Kimmel speaks at Disney’s Advertising Upfront on May 13 in New York City. Disney via Getty Images Key Facts Disney-owned ABC announced Wednesday Kimmel’s show will be taken off the air “indefinitely,” which came after ABC affiliate owner Nexstar—which needs Federal Communications Commission approval to complete a planned acquisition of competitor Tegna Inc.—said it would not air the program due to Kimmel’s comments Monday regarding Kirk’s death and the reaction to it. The sudden move drew particular concern because it came only hours after FCC head Brendan Carr called for ABC to “take action” against Kimmel, and cryptically suggested his agency could take action saying, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.” While ABC and Nexstar have not given any indication their decisions were influenced by Carr’s comments, the timing raised concerns among legal experts that the Trump administration’s threats may have unlawfully coerced ABC and Nexstar to punish Kimmel, which could constitute jawboning. Jawboning refers to “the use of official speech to inappropriately compel private action,” as defined by the Cato Institute, as governments or public officials—who cannot directly punish private actors for speech they don’t like—can use strongman tactics to try and indirectly silence critics or influence private companies’ actions. The practice is fairly loosely defined and there aren’t many legal safeguards dictating how violations of it are enforced, the Knight First Amendment Institute notes, but the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled it can be unlawful and an impermissible First Amendment violation when it involves specific threats. The White…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 07:17
Why Fintech Platforms Are Growing Faster Than Traditional Banks

Why Fintech Platforms Are Growing Faster Than Traditional Banks

Fintech platforms are outpacing traditional banks in growth across nearly every measurable dimension. Customer acquisition rates, revenue growth, geographic expansion
Share
Techbullion2026/03/24 07:58
Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly

Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly

BitcoinWorld Japan’s CPI Reveals Critical 1.3% Inflation Rise in February as Core Pressure Eases Unexpectedly TOKYO, Japan — March 2025: Japan’s National Consumer
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/24 08:10