Roughly 70% of financial institutions worldwide are now investing in fintech partnerships, according to research from PwC’s Global Fintech Report. That figure hasRoughly 70% of financial institutions worldwide are now investing in fintech partnerships, according to research from PwC’s Global Fintech Report. That figure has

How 70% of Financial Institutions Are Investing in Fintech Partnerships

2026/03/24 10:47
6 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Roughly 70% of financial institutions worldwide are now investing in fintech partnerships, according to research from PwC’s Global Fintech Report. That figure has risen steadily over the past five years. In 2018, the same survey found that fewer than 45% of banks had active fintech partnerships. The shift from competition to collaboration has been one of the defining trends in financial services.

The reason is straightforward. Banks have customers, capital, and regulatory licences. Fintech companies have modern technology, faster development cycles, and better user interfaces. Combining the two produces results that neither can achieve alone.

How 70% of Financial Institutions Are Investing in Fintech Partnerships

Why Banks Started Partnering With Fintechs

For most of the 2010s, the dominant narrative in financial services was disruption. Fintech startups were going to replace banks. Neobanks would steal deposits. Peer-to-peer lenders would take over consumer lending. Payment apps would make card networks obsolete.

That narrative turned out to be mostly wrong. Banks did not disappear. They had advantages that fintech companies could not easily replicate. Regulatory licences take years to obtain. Deposit insurance is expensive and requires government approval. Large corporate clients and high-net-worth individuals prefer the stability of established institutions. According to McKinsey’s Global Banking Annual Review, traditional banks still hold more than 90% of global deposits.

What banks lacked was speed. A typical bank’s core technology infrastructure was built in the 1980s or 1990s, often running on COBOL mainframes. Updating these systems is expensive and risky. A major core banking migration can take three to five years and cost hundreds of millions of dollars. Many banks decided it was faster and cheaper to partner with fintech companies than to build modern capabilities internally.

How These Partnerships Work in Practice

Fintech-bank partnerships take several forms, and the structures have become more sophisticated over time.

The most common model is the technology vendor relationship. A bank licenses technology from a fintech company to improve a specific capability. For example, many banks use Plaid’s APIs to verify customer bank accounts and connect to external financial data. Others use Featurespace or Feedzai for real-time fraud detection powered by machine learning. The bank retains the customer relationship and the fintech provides the underlying technology.

Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) is a more integrated model. In this arrangement, a bank provides its banking licence and regulatory infrastructure while a fintech company builds the customer-facing product. Green Dot, Cross River Bank, and Sutton Bank in the US have all served as the banking partners behind fintech products like Chime, Stripe Treasury, and Cash App. The fintech handles the user experience, marketing, and customer acquisition. The bank handles compliance, holds the deposits, and earns a share of the revenue.

Some partnerships go further into joint ventures or strategic investments. Goldman Sachs built its Marcus consumer banking platform partly through partnerships with Apple (for the Apple Card) and Amazon (for small business lending). JPMorgan Chase has made multiple fintech acquisitions, including 55ip (investment technology) and Renovite Technologies (payment processing). These are not arm’s-length vendor relationships. They are strategic bets on fintech capabilities becoming core to the bank’s operations.

What the Data Shows About Partnership Outcomes

Banks that invest in fintech partnerships report measurable improvements across several metrics.

Customer acquisition costs tend to fall. According to a 2024 survey by Accenture, banks with active fintech partnerships reduced their average customer acquisition cost by 20% to 35% compared to banks relying solely on traditional channels. Digital onboarding processes, often built by fintech partners, allow customers to open accounts in minutes rather than days.

Loan processing times improve. Traditional mortgage origination in the US takes an average of 45 days, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. Banks using fintech platforms for automated underwriting and document processing have cut that to 15 to 20 days. AI-powered financial tools are handling an increasing share of credit decisions, reducing both processing time and default rates.

Fraud detection rates improve as well. Machine learning models built by fintech partners can process thousands of transaction signals in real time, flagging suspicious activity faster and more accurately than rules-based systems. Several major banks reported 30% to 50% reductions in fraud losses after implementing fintech-built detection systems, according to data from the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.

The Risks and Tensions

Fintech-bank partnerships are not without problems. Regulatory scrutiny of these arrangements has increased, particularly around BaaS models. In 2023 and 2024, US banking regulators issued enforcement actions against several banks for failing to properly oversee their fintech partners. Evolve Bank & Trust and Blue Ridge Bank both faced regulatory orders related to their fintech partnership programmes.

The concern from regulators is that some banks are outsourcing too much responsibility to fintech partners without maintaining adequate oversight of compliance, anti-money laundering controls, and consumer protection. This has led to a tightening of expectations around how banks manage third-party relationships.

Data sharing is another area of tension. Banks are cautious about sharing customer data with fintech partners, partly due to regulatory requirements and partly due to competitive concerns. Open banking regulations in Europe and the UK have forced banks to share data with authorised third parties, but the implementation has been uneven. Some banks comply with the letter of the regulation while making the data-sharing process as slow and difficult as possible.

Where This Is Heading

The 70% figure is likely to keep rising. Embedded finance, which requires banks to provide financial products through non-bank platforms, depends entirely on these partnerships. As more retailers, platforms, and software companies want to offer financial services to their users, they need a bank partner to provide the regulated infrastructure.

The nature of the partnerships is also evolving. Early fintech-bank relationships were often transactional. A bank would licence a piece of technology, use it for a specific function, and that was the extent of the relationship. Newer partnerships tend to be deeper and more strategic. Banks are taking equity stakes in fintech companies, co-developing products, and integrating fintech capabilities into their core operations rather than treating them as add-ons.

For fintech companies, bank partnerships are often the fastest path to scale. Building a fully licensed, regulated financial institution from scratch takes years and costs millions. Partnering with an existing bank gives a fintech company access to the regulatory infrastructure, deposit base, and institutional credibility it would otherwise need to build on its own. The companies that manage these partnerships well, balancing innovation speed with regulatory compliance, are the ones most likely to succeed in the next decade of financial services.

Comments
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Vitalik Buterin lays out new Ethereum roadmap at EDCON

Vitalik Buterin lays out new Ethereum roadmap at EDCON

The post Vitalik Buterin lays out new Ethereum roadmap at EDCON appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. At EDCON 2025 in Osaka, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin delivered fresh details of Ethereum’s technical roadmap, delineating both short-term scaling goals and longer-term protocol transformations. The immediate priority, according to slides from the presentation, is scaling at the L1 level by raising the gas limit while maintaining decentralization. Tools such as block-level access lists, ZK-EVMs, gas repricing, and slot optimization were highlighted as means to improve throughput and efficiency. A central theme of the presentation was privacy, divided into protections for on-chain “writes” (transactions, voting, DeFi operations) and “reads” (retrieving blockchain state). Write privacy could be achieved through client-side zero-knowledge proofs, encrypted voting, and mixnet-based transaction relays. Read privacy efforts include trusted execution environments, private information retrieval techniques, dummy queries to obscure access patterns, and partial state nodes that reveal only necessary data. These measures aim to reduce information leakage across both ends of user interaction. In the medium term, Ethereum’s focus shifts to cross-Layer-2 interoperability. Vitalik described trustless L2 asset transfers, proof aggregation, and faster settlement mechanisms as key milestones toward a seamless rollup ecosystem. Faster slots and stronger finality, supported by techniques like erasure coding and three-stage finalization (3SF), are also in scope to enhance responsiveness and security. The roadmap also includes Stage 2 rollup advancements to strengthen verification efficiency, alongside a call for broader community participation to help build and maintain these improvements. The long-term “Lean Ethereum” blueprint emphasizes security, simplicity and optimization, with ambitions for quantum-resistant cryptography, formal verification of the protocol, and adoption of ideal primitives for hashing, signatures, and zero-knowledge proofs. Buterin stressed that these improvements are not just for scalability but to make Ethereum a stable, trustworthy foundation for the broader decentralized ecosystem. This is a developing story. This article was generated with the assistance of AI and reviewed by editor Jeffrey Albus before publication.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:22
WADESK Just Dropped the Ultimate WASender Free Tool for Marketers

WADESK Just Dropped the Ultimate WASender Free Tool for Marketers

Marketing budgets are tight these days. If you are like most small business owners or digital marketers, you are constantly juggling five different expensive subscriptions
Share
Techbullion2026/03/24 18:46
The old and weak president is losing — because he’s old and weak

The old and weak president is losing — because he’s old and weak

I was surprised. Though Donald Trump is the weakest president of my lifetime, in terms of principle and character, I didn't think he would set himself up to prove
Share
Alternet2026/03/24 19:25